Sentences with phrase «not against love»

For the record, Susan and I are not against love.

For the record, Susan and I are not against love.

Not exact matches

I might also add I have recently read «Eating the Big Fish: How Challenger Brands Can Compete Against Brand Leader» by Adam Morgan and also «The Start - Up of You» by Reid Hoffman, Ben Casnocha, which I loved and did not hesitate to add to this list.

«Wouldn't we love to run against Oprah?

We rage against out - of - control CEO pay, demand stricter corporate governance, and yet we love the dominant leader who cuts through the noise, gives us something we didn't know we wanted and creates the most valuable company in the world in an industry — consumer electronics and entertainment — that commands just two or three per cent of household budgets and GDP.

Turns out those human aliens don't love Earth very much, as the off - world Settlement Defense Front decides to wage war against the third rock from the sun.

They both had experience building companies, loved to work hard and move fast, and didn't mind an uphill battle against outdated industry norms.

Now I am not against teaching about giving, but I believe it is a gift from God to us to be able to give, and I believe if the love for God and the love for people are taught, giving will happen — giving for the right purposes.

But you can't love God while you're sinning against Him.

Judas was not to become a martyr because of the way the apostles wrote about him in the Gospel - they saw through the eyes of men, and Judas was unable to redeem himself before he died a natural death, dying instead loathed, hated & driven to suicide for his deed against the Son of God, Jesus, whom he had Loved so much.

You can love God while sinning against Him, isn't that the point of Confession and penance??

Hatred is what they certainly project, not love for the embryos, which is a piece of nonsense no one could experience, but hatred, a virulent hatred for an unnamed object... Their hatred is directed against human beings as such, against the mind, against reason, against ambition, against success, against love, against any value that brings happiness to human life.

State sanctioned rights must not be influenced by religious beliefs and a company which uses consumer money to donate to causes that continue to oppress and discriminate against those we «love» should be exposed.

To be reasoned and reasonable might not be traits of rationalities attributed to many loving Christians who are too hellishly scared to clamour against the folds of riddled Atheists who do ever make a foolish mockery out of all Christendoms!

Look, if god / jesus is all - loving, he won't hold it against me for using the brain he gave me to think.

You are making statements against one that we love even though you do not know God.

All our religion, our art, our poetry, our loves, our devotion to great undertakings, and not the least the great undertaking of children and family, is a waving of little flags of protest against the finality of death.

They did not weigh their safety against spreading Christ's word (Love).

I am not sure what you mean by «love» but I'd encourage you to discuss this with a true servant of faith, rather than continue in rage against what you oppose.

So why has not every christian that says they believe in god, love and Jesus been marching in the streets every day for the last 10 + years against the 2 wars we've been fighting in?

Because He can not force us to love or believe in Him, there must be a place separate from Him and His redeeming act on the cross for those who have sinned against Him.

We can dislike what they are doing, we can even speak out against things that are not right, yet we are to love them unconditionally, which admittedly, is difficult at times.

Yet so - called «loving christians» say worse than that regularly in these blogs against «unbelievers», so don't act all offended and shocked.

So why has not every god dam christian that says they believe in god, love and Jesus been marching in the streets every day for the last 10 + years against the 2 wars we've been fighting in?

«Isn't the simplest touch of a child's arm on the face more important, isn't the good meal, the brush against a thigh, a hand held during a movie, a swim in the sea, aren't those things of equal importance as the sands of time come rushing down on our heads burying ambition and love, good and evil, breath, blood, brains, waste, memory, alike in the oblivion?»

32.35) And, «Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself.»

I find the unremitting hostility and animus of atheists like «Derp» baffling; for all the seemingly wonderful life he is enjoying, he seems compelled to get on this site and spew derision, mockery, and hatred against others.I simply do not, can not grasp that mindset; to claim to actually derive pleasure from in effect being a bully - again, that say a whole lot about his true character.So... Peace & Love to all!!

Our love of the past conflicts often with your plans for the future; our love of order does not show up on abstract statistics; our tendency to look to each other for affection and support stands against a minister's wish to obtain emotional support away from the small church.

But my puerile conclusion from all this was that if God was so great, so loving and wonderful, then God wouldn't hold it against anyone who didn't know if they believed in God — and so what difference did it make?

Any society, Christian or not, has both a sacred sphere and a profane sphere, a sphere in which love and obligation determine who gets what as against the sphere in which prudence and courage do so.

I don't know how to raise them in the faith in any other way than this: God is good, God is Love, God is for you, never against you, and when you want to dance, darling, wave your flag and spin, let the wind of the Spirit move through you.

We need not fear anything demonic, but we should acknowledge it's presence and pray against it, if it's in our churches and build people up in truth and love.

Once I accepted it as genuine love, I had no choice but to accept that God, who is love, would not be against me expressing that love and would in fact help me to walk in that love.

You are embraced, wrapped and protected in His Kevlar Love and you're bullet proof against the shrapnel lies of being not enough or too much.

It holds a variety of Christian themes about Jesus, salvation, global day of prayer, blah blah blah; you know the usual tacky Christian attempt to witness to unsuspecting motorists who are forced to see this massive sign against their will and resent the fact that they have to look up and see not Coca - Cola, but «Jesus loves you enough to die for you».

His only judgments came against the religious leaders who were judged not for their sins but, because they lived in continual judgment of any who did not act just like they did and because they failed to extend grace and love to those who needed it the most.

What good does «LOVE» do if you reject the Jesus that said of himself that he did not come to send peace but a sword, to set variance against people?

Shouldn't the sin of rebellion against God be repaid with a deprivation of God's Law, the greatest expression of His own particular love for the Jews?

For this new theism, the significance of Jesus is found first in his providing the classical instance of what is always and everywhere operative, although it is working against serious obstacles that yet can not defeat the cosmic thrust toward loving and sharing.

So it is the persistent refusal to repent, and accept God's grace and love that keeps hell going, not His determination to keep sinners there against their will.

While it is true that Jesus offered no resistance to physical attacks against himself, his love did not prevent him from using the most aggressive and blistering invective against those who thought they held a «corner» in religion.

It seems that we are so used to writing against things that we can not articulate well to the culture what God loves and what He has lovingly designed for our good!

At the same time the Elder writes another short letter, our Second John, to the church to which Gaius belongs, urging its members to love one another and to live harmoniously together, and warning them against the deceivers who teach that Christ has not come in the flesh.

Doesn't anyone see what is coming — is it not obvious, war is coming, and it will be middle america against these religious groups, and they already love violence and know how to kil.

Such civil righteousness is not the same as spiritual righteousness, namely, the true pure love which only the Holy Spirit can work in human hearts against the impulses of the flesh.

Don't these people love it when Christians and especially Catholics go against the moral law — it's a bit like giving them a security blanket to hug!

But they do not follow by a special act of divine wrath or retribution; they follow by the reaction of God's loving power against that which violates love.

This passage is not talking about having lost a loved - one; it's talking about suffering against the flesh.

They can be, and they have been, born of an amplitude of love, in which case righteous anger can be directed against manipulators of distrust and hate, and not against those who are not «like us.»

Somehow, active public discrimination against homosexuals and barring fellow human beings from marriage rights does not seem very loving or neighborly to me.