Sentences with phrase «not against religion»

I am not against religion - I have seen the comfort that many people have gotten from their faiths.

The attack was against the US, not against a religion.

I am not against any religion worshiping any inanimate object they chose just stop trying to convert people.

«The Tibetan leader answered that Marx was not against religion or religious philosophy per se but against religious institutions that were allied, during Marx's time, with the European ruling class.

I am not against religion.

I'm not against religion in the form of ritual.

I am not against religions, but I really hate those wh ore politicians and snake oil salesmen who claim to be religious and conservative.

I am not against religions or your GOD, but If you use your mind a bit, you will see, that: 1.

Not exact matches

Spotify noted its policy that «Illegal content or material that favors hatred or incites violence against race, religion, sexuality or the like is not tolerated by us.»

The government argues the text of the order does not mention any specific religion and is needed to protect the country against attacks.

And if contract workers lose a contract or are otherwise discriminated against on the basis of age, religion, sex, disability status, or national origin, they have little recourse.15 Moreover, discretionary company - provided benefits — such as paid leave and retirement contributions — are not typically available to independent contractors.

SunTrust does not discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, creed, color, gender, religion, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, pregnancy, marital status, citizenship status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, or any other classification protected by applicable laws.

(not that i am specifically against religion either, but some their ideas / teachings based purely on faith are too unquestionable.)

Don't you ever get tired of spewing the party line against religion, and how it causes wars?

A: «Shame on Mormonism is correct - not only are they against blacks and gays, but women have few rights in this religion.»

Shame on Mormonism is correct - not only are they against blacks and gays, but women have few rights in this religion.

Theists are so pathetic, since they can't compete against the logic and reason of atheism, they try to drag in down to the level of religion

However, You hve not posted a single valid point against the fact that religion does have value.

Sidhak's father, Sagardeep Singh Arora argued that the school discriminated against his son, by not allowing him to wear the patka or have uncut hair - essential parts of his religion.

But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars against our flesh, even as Christ wars against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria

All religions were created by men - not women - to control the masses.They have discriminated against women from the beginning and in «the name of God» have created more wars, deaths and destruction than anything else in the world.Religions are nothing more that dictatorships in the «name of God»... pure bull!!!

Pushing back against religion is not itself a religion.

But within the context of people saying they are SBNR, I don't really see such people reacting against a loosely defined definition of religion as merely moral teachings administered with certain rituals and structures.

Atheism isn't a religion, but an argument against religion; thus, it is not a separation of church and state issue.

And, finally, the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli plainly states: «The government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian Religion, as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Mussulmen [Moslems].»

MatK, I think the issue is that IF someone runs and isn't elected BECAUSE they have a different religion (or lack thereof), they could legitimately say they were discriminated against for that reason, which would not be allowed.

But unless you have an alternative that meets the same criteria as your passionate argument against religion I can not understand the logic in believing in nothing.

Well let me tell you that all corruption, destruction and decline of morals is not caused by religious ones but in the contrary it was and still is caused by disbelievers who have nothing to stand on except standing against all good morals brought by religions... well Mr. Go enjoy your infidelity with your kind and leave out religious ones from your hopelessness...

The problem with religion is not religion in and of itself, but the way in which the unscrupulous and / or indiscriminate perennially try to co-opt the role of governance within a state of law in it's name to suit their desires and against the will of the governed.

All our religion, our art, our poetry, our loves, our devotion to great undertakings, and not the least the great undertaking of children and family, is a waving of little flags of protest against the finality of death.

It is not a rant against the irrationality of religion.

Existing constitutional provisions against establishments of religion did not bar public spending on education from reaching schools with religious affiliations, and Blaine's amendment did not propose to alter this arrangement except by excluding Catholics.

But I do not go around calling individuals «immoral» when they do not conform to the tenets of my religion (as the bishops, etc. have done in their outcry against birth control).

How about the religious stop their war against everyone who doesn't follow their religion.

You raise a very good point that escapes most theists and that is while they argue against atheists for not believing in their god, they forget that most of those arguments could be applied to them by somebody of another religion.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

The Prince concluded that «anti-Semitism is not only opposed to religion, it is against all the unwritten divine and human laws.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, soldiers, most of whom are Christian, have waged war against fighters who are Muslim, but not on account of their religion.

The long list of «grievances» (I guess that's a fair enough word) against religion should not lead you to believe that I am «mad at God» or any of the other common stereotypes people hold of nonbelievers.

President Obama was for it, before he was against it: first giving a speech about religion and our constitutional system so high - minded that it was audible only to bats» and then, as criticism mounted, hurriedly explaining that he wasn't actually lending his support to the project.

I also hear of religious people seeking to discriminate against others that don't share their religion, primarily atheists, and often Muslims too.

In fact, the oppression of some Christian governments against rival sects of Christians is the entire reason our founding fathers built our government to be secular, with no authority on religious matters, with no voice over the religion of its citizens, and guaranteed to all the freedom to worship, or not, as their conscious dictates.

As much as I do not like Obama; I do not believe his policies are against or for any particulat religion.

it's insane how you know so little of your own religion and how you go against your Christs teaching with such arrogant and disdain towards atheist and other religions your nothing but a bigot and hatemonger your world is only black and white and you can't fathom how a country can have so many different people with different believes that don't match yours and can live peacefully without your christs.

Unfortunately they couldn't take our Book of Mormon because I guess it was against the rules of their religion (very closed minded I though since I had read their Qur «an).

He would help our economy out of this record breaking downturn that we are facing, but because of his religion, which doesn't even matter we are discriminating against him.

I'm not against the Jewish Religion, although I think all religion is myth.

Quran: You shall fight back against those who do not believe in GOD, nor in the Last Day, nor do they prohibit what GOD and His messenger have prohibited, nor do they abide by the religion of truth — among those who received the scripture — until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly.

Science isn't fighting a war against religion.

If their religion is against those services they have the CHOICE to use or not use.