Sentences with phrase «not against the article»

Not exact matches

Daiichi Sankyo's press release comes in the wake not only of Ranbaxy's highly unusual criminal guilty plea and $ 500 million in fines and penalties — the largest ever against a generic - drug maker — but also a lengthy Fortune article that exposed for the first time the depth and extent of the fraud charges leveled at the company and the knowledge of senior company executives.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein hit back against GOP lawmakers who drafted articles of impeachment against him, saying the DOJ «is not going to be extorted.»

Also the article read like pure comedy gold, I'm surprised the judge didn't file for misconduct against apple's lawyer.

«This is a really important article — the impression I get is that it's almost unethical to be lecturing if you have this data,» says Eric Mazur, a physicist at Harvard University who has campaigned against stale lecturing techniques for 27 years and was not involved in the work.

Articles on Facebook will not initially count against the 10 free items people who are not Times subscribers are allowed to read each month.

Anyway, what the article takes an awful long time getting around to — after twice saying the question they pose isn't so outlandish or premature and that the recent volatility shows how jittery people are AND pointing out that the tax plan and increased spending «boxed» the economy into a corner against the chance for stimulus in case we have a recession — is this: It's going to be hard on people.

Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein is taking aim at Republican lawmakers who have drafted articles of impeachment against him, saying that he would not comment on documents «that nobody has the courage to put their name on» and asserting that he will not change his behavior in the face of threats.

Meanwhile, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Tuesday that the Justice Department is «not going to be extorted» after members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus drafted articles of impeachment against him.

And according to an article in the Journal of Conflict and Security Law by David Fidler, a professor of law at Indiana University, the current international law is «not well positioned to support responses to terrorist cyberattacks,» and there are no «strong incentives» for states to develop international law against this threat due to the relative dearth of these occurrences.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein took aim Tuesday at Republican lawmakers who have drafted articles of impeachment against him, saying that he would not comment on documents «that nobody has the courage to put their name on» and asserting that he...

As Breitbart News reported, the Washington Post and the Hill obtained a copy of the eight articles of impeachment drawn up by the conservative House Freedom Caucus against Rosenstein because he has not provided the documentation requested as part an investigation into FBI surveillance during the 2016 presidential election.

In this article, they said ERISA Section 406 provides prohibitions against fiduciary self - dealing and that «In accordance with these prohibited transaction rules, a plan sponsor must not use the assets of the plan to benefit itself.

Thiel, who bid for Gawker's assets on Jan. 10, also agreed to release claims against an eventual buyer and authors of articles on the website, as well as not fund new litigation against Gawker over its archives.

I just don't like it when people cherry pick their religious sources or, in the case of this article, outright go against what their religious texts teach to try and appear more politically correct.

Austin... just as the article stated... «We want to be known for what we stand for, not what we are against.»

@Mike, I said nothing against the church (this time) I spoke against the Priest, who, if you read the larger article, did NOT carry out teh funeral.

The article is saying the the Mormon church is enforcing its policy of not performing vicarious baptisms of holocaust victims and is apologizing and taking corrective action based on a single runaway member doing something that was clearly against the rules.

And couldn't your post have reflected your thoughts on the article itself instead of promoting more prejudice against atheists?

I hope his fellow church members do not read this article and turn against him.

Acts like these win popular support very quickly, and it would not have been long before only the most hardened of the Roman elite stood against the Christians, so this article makes sense to me.

article,»... Let's not kid ourselves: There is no war on Christmas...» It's a phony war against a phony holy day.

No one is crazy enough to read articles from CNN that range from «the Bible is against gays, don't read it» to «the Bible says gay is okay, so obey it.»

I'm not defending their current policies which need more transparancy and alterations to allow anyone to believe in any religion they want, but this article masks real religious injustice of the discrimination against Tibetians and their religious practices by making it a «Christian» persecution thing.

This article will summarise Fr Edward Holloway's arguments against contraception while also arguing that Natural Family Planning is a good but not «perfect» use of the marriage act.

My piece was not a «lament,» but essentially a defense of Pope Benedict (as was my brief follow - up here) against just the type of over-the-top criticisms cited elsewhere in Allen's article, even as I raised one respectful question about the pope's prudential decision not to meet with leading dissidents — a legitimate, good - faith debate among sincere Catholics.

The article isn't intended to «give him an out», but is intended to try to explain why there is praises for and protests against his apology.

Unfortunately, few Catholics do this which is why so many of them do not understand why the Church stands against things like the HHS mandate and why non-Catholics like the author of this article don't understand it as well.

I don't recall anywhere in the article, him arguing against religion or God.

Finally, and much as I appreciate rhetorical high spirits, I hope Professor Griffiths will permit me the observation that it really doesn't advance the ongoing debate to suggest that James Turner Johnson is blowing smoke when he explains how James Childress» seminal 1978 article on prima facie duties and the just war tradition jump - started the «presumption against war» trope.

Often times, the religious rights are self - righteous, but their lives may be full of conflicts against the Bible teaching; as the article points out, you can not follow all the rules laid out in the Old testaments, and if you believe the Bible literally, why do many religious rights do not follow as the Bible literally says.

The only thing that bugs me about this guy is that there are more people than not who are teetering on the brink of faith in Jesus, and all this guy does is try to knock people away from faith... This is his word against Gods word, I've been reading these articles they've been posting, and nothing he's said has any biblical foundation whatsoever...

Faith isn't half as cartoonish or clearly defined as those who diminish it: If you only base your arguments against faith from academic texts, magazine articles or «arguments» you've had online, well, then who's actually poorly educated on the subject?

But though Article 2 of the Charter sought to outlaw any use of armed force between or among states except in defense against aggression, it did not clearly define what counted as aggression — a matter that remains unsettled, as the recent debate over what counts as legitimate preemption testifies.

Spew and hate, read the same article you did I don't recall Mr Cathy using those words it sounds like you are the one ready to use those words when you don't like what you hear, as for the other I did misspell and I do understand that officials are the ones ready to discriminate against those whoever they are were elected to serve with their own opinion.

n 1797, the United States Senate ratified a treaty with Tripoli that stated in Article 11: As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

I do not wish to make a case against Cobb's theology, which is clearly an original contribution both to the contemporary church and academy, based on my reading of one article.

Luther spoke in 1537 of justification as the «first and chief article,» which can not be «given up or compromised,» for on it «rests all that we teach and practice against the pope, the devil, and the world.»

Christians already know not to really listen to any CNN articles, but this is just further proof of the anti-Christian sentiment levied against Christians now on a daily basis.

Written by Gary Cass, the article was entitled «Why I Am an Islamaphobic» and then proceeded to not only argue that it is impossible for any Muslims to come to Jesus, but that the only way to «deal with» our Muslim neighbours was to deport them, sterilize them, or take up arms against them.

In a survey article it has been pointed out that even in North America the recognition has emerged that Jesus was «deeply sociopolitical, though not... an advocate of armed struggle against Rome.»

Conor Gaugham weighed in with a Huffington Post article explaining that protestors are not simply «arguing over chicken,» but over the 5 million in donations that Chick - fil - A --(the restaurant itself, not Cathy personally)-- has sent to organizations that «fight to discriminate against [gays and lesbians].»

Humility does not prevent us pointing out that Faith has published numerous articles over recent years which have addressed in detail many of the attacks levelled against the Church in the debate.

This is a refreshing point of view from a Christian and my not being a religious person will be able to recall this article when having the gay marriage debate with Christians who are against it for religious reasons.

As cited in the article, Dostoevsky's main complaint against Rome is that «it is not even a religion but very definitely the continuation of the Holy Roman Empire....

Many Christians saw the article as fuel for the narrative that the media is biased against them, but others took issue with the idea that Jesus didn't go to hell after His death.

It's simple as this, Rick Santorum appeals to the less educated, extremely conservative and more bigot minded segment of rural America, which is largely dominated by Born again evangelicals, who as the article points out have a misguided view that that Mormons aren't Christian, and in their misguided bigotry seem to be voting against Romney based upon their religion rather than for a good candidate who can win the general election.

I can't beleieve this article, another slam against Christians.

But the problem with NP's article, whether he meant it that way or not is that he seems to be opening up the door to things that the apostles warned against -LCB- paragraphs 4 & 5 -RCB-.

I certainly do not see this article as a dig against Christians.

I do this... as a duty of brotherly love, so that if any misfortune or disaster comes out of this matter, it may not be attributed to me, nor will I be blamed before God and men because of my silence... We have no one on earth to thank for this disastrous rebellion except you princes and lords, and especially you blind bishops and mad priests and monks whose hearts are hardened... The murder - prophets [a reference to Karlstadt, Muntzer and all the Schwarmerei] who hate me as they hate you, have come among these people... for more than three years, and no one has resisted and fought against them except me... I beseech you not to make light of this rebellion... The peasants have just published twelve articles some of which are so fair and just as to take away your reputation in the eyes of God... Because you made light of my To The German Nobility you must now listen to and put up with these selfish articles.