Sentences with phrase «not against the principles»

He told them that his daughter got a golf scholarship to Wisconsin, and therefore he is not against the principles of Title IX as a way to get more women on athletic scholarships who deserve one (and not opposed to financial assistance for his family, either).

A prisoner on probation is still liable to imprisonment, but the sentence has been suspended; it is not against any principle of common law to require financial or other sureties.

Not exact matches

Not surprisingly, Trump's remarks triggered outrage among the media because it amounts to a head - on attack against the principle of a free press — a fundamental element of the U.S. democratic system.

The FCC's decades - long commitment to and enforcement of this basic principle — that ISPs don't get to pick winners and losers on the Internet — means Internet users in the U.S. haven't had to worry about whether ISPs might block or discriminate against certain kinds of content or applications.

That's not a knock - down argument against any and all principled refusals to do business, but it's a point worth making.

Best Quote: «It is much more profitable for salespeople to present the expensive item first, not only because to fail to do so will lose the influence of the contrast principle; to fail to do so will also cause the principle to work actively against them.

Interestingly, the biggest move here wasn't from customers themselves but from the European Union Court of Justice, which upheld the Right to be Forgotten principle in a May ruling against Google.

Having dazzled you with the power of compounded returns, we want to make sure that same principle's not working against you.

A recent SEC order instituting administrative and cease - and - desist proceedings against a small hedge fund manager confirms the principle that hedge fund investors — not managers — own the assets in funds and any assets generated with those assets, subject to specific exceptions.

They rightly insisted on the constitutional principle that government could not intervene, but then they drew the conclusion that the discussion should thus be over» and that only bigots and un-American theocrats would continue agitating against an Islamic center near Ground Zero.

Nayed accepted that even God could not go against the principle of noncontradiction but that his actions could easily be beyond our rational capacity to grasp («extra-rational»).

Indeed we may say, perhaps a little exaggeratedly but not without reason, the liturgy such as it is actually performed today — though, we hope, against its own ultimate principles — this liturgy itself increases this greater danger, because it often has a harmful influence on the private prayer of individuals and groups.

On the other hand such personalism iuris divini, which despite its importance can not here be proved theologically, is a principle of resistance against the well - known dangers and shortcomings of democracy in large societies where self - government by the people, for example, by plebiscite is no longer possible and the representation which takes its place be - comes more and moe autonomous.

Paul stands (identifies) with those who identify with the divine principle and stands against those who do not, claiming that they have embraced a human principle.

He Himself had wealth, He used capitalistic principles as the basis for most of His parables, and His teachings against greed were not to say that we couldn't have money, but rather, that money should not HAVE us.

In this sentence I have been recalling against Hartshorne one of the most well - known passages of Process and Reality: «In the first place, God is not to be treated as an exception to all metaphysical principles, invoked to save their collapse.

Speaking on BBC Radio Lincolnshire, Peter Tatchell said: «He can't perhaps comment about the individuality of that particular case, but he certainly could comment on the principle, which is that he has, in the past, supported legal discrimination against gay people.

She also likes to play Plants vs. Zombies (not while in motion, of course) even though the violent nature of the game goes against her Christian principles.

It was in principle open to new ideas and to criticism; so it could not defend itself against these.

I agree that with our current system the death penalty should be stopped, but I'm not against it in principle.

This principle requires not only that individuals have enforceable rights against data users, but also that individuals have recourse to courts or a government agency to investigate and / or prosecute non-compliance by data processors.

Newman recounts his realization of this principle in the Apologia: «It was difficult... to find arguments against the Tridentine Fathers, which did not tell against the Fathers of Chalcedon; difficult to condemn the Popes of the sixteenth century, without condemning the Popes of the fifth.»

ROMNEY to me maybe a Mormon, but his values & proven record, do not go against Christian principles, as opposed to Obama who claims to be a Christian but his record prove otherwise... NO TO PRO ABORTION CANDIDATE, NO TO PRO MURDER OF INNOCENT HUMAN BEINGS... YESSSSS ROMNEY ROCKS!

Against this it is not possible to point with the same plausibility to the origin of a single infra - human organism even if we assumed like the Vitalists an intrinsically non-spatial substantial living principle.

Reinhold Niebuhr is less dualistic in that he stresses the relevance of love as an «impossible possibility» to every human situation, but he warns so continually against a sentimental substitution of love for the requirements of justice that the major impact of his thought is a dichotomy in which again justice, and not love, is the determining principle of social ethics.

For what this truly and blessedly means is that God can not be less than man, endowed with personality, freedom und love, and that the mystery itself is free protective love, not an «objective order» which one can, after all, possess (at least in principle), and against which one could ensure oneself.

To me, it's just a messy mix of between racism and hypocrisy — they just don't like the guy because he's less than 100 % white and they're all still bitter about it, and they're fighting against many of the principles that is taught in their own New Testament.

In fact, most if not all of the relevant evidence, as the previous example illustrated, counts against the idea that physics can in principle provide a complete account of the physical world, especially given the existence of human and other animals in it.

Our case against Bultmann is not that he makes this distinction, but the method and principles he uses to carry it out.

Don't mind us, here, eating this pure white fruit» here, I'll spit it out so we can talk» we certainly have no principled complaints against your lovely and very spacious building... just excuse us while we work some things out with our well - meaning but rather tradition - bound General Authorities.

The answer is that they were confronted in the first place with vast cultural trends such as technological advance, professionalization, and secularism that they could not easily control; and their problem was made the worse by pressures of cultural pluralism and Christian ethical principles that made it awkward if not impossible for them to take any decisive stand against the secularizing trends.

The question is of importance because he uses that principle — the ineradicableness of the positive, or the primacy of the positive — as a weapon not only against those who espouse purely negative facts but against those who propose metaphysical principles which involve exclusive negativity.

The anthropic principle direct comparison is stating that if we line you up against 100 marksman with rifles and they pull the trigger and yet you are not hit with any bullets.

In other words, Whitehead's reference to creativity as the universal «factor of activity which is the reason for the origin of the new occasion of experience» (Adventures 179) is not against the ontological principle.

Over the last decade, we've sold thousands of homes with the guiding principle of producing value and breathing life into each family that has crossed our path, and we do not, nor will we ever discriminate against people who do not share our views.»

It's easy enough to say well don't join a religious organization if you are against their principles.

This attitude is neither hypocritical nor dishonest; it is the logical consequence of the fundamentalist siege mentality which dictates the principle that «he who is not with us is against us.»

Progressive is generally just a code word for someone who leans toward socialism, who does not believe in God, & who will likely vote against Godly principles that are so important to our nation.

He then told followers that not only was the word «progressive» «just a code word» for «for someone who leans toward socialism,» he also added that it's code for someone «who does not believe in God, & who will likely vote against Godly principles that are so important to our nation.»

Perhaps, however, it is legitimate not merely to argue against his conclusions but to urge against his position from the start the general principle that an outsider can not understand a civilization or a great religion unless he approaches it with humility and love.

The pagan temptation,» as the philosopher Thomas Molnar described it, is hardly new — the Church has been fighting paganism since the time of Christ — but what is new is its aggressive resurgence, its seduction of so many Christians, and the warnings Pope Francis has issued against it.The Pope's scorching words against paganism have not been well - received by many, but Francis has gone right on assailing it, particularly in areas that pagans care about most: the environment and sex.Francis has been a bold and eloquent defender of the environment, and understands that protecting the environment is not a recent fad, but a long - standing Catholic principle, highlighted by many of Francis's predecessors.

I am not one that thinks that a mormon or any person from any religeon can not be president but i am saying that you can not claim to be mormon and be president because a lot of what a president has to do goes directly against the principles of the church.

This is directed against the Gnostics who claimed that they were in the most intimate possible fellowship with God, fellowship not even possible for the ordinary man, and who yet wallowed in sin, either on the principle that the body is evil and therefore it does not matter what is done with it or in it, or on the principle that in sin the body does no more than fulfil its own nature, and that in either case the spirit is left quite untouched.

Jose Miguel Vivanco of Human Rights Watch said: «The new penal code [banning abortion] doesn't just go against basic human rights: It goes against fundamental principles of humanity».

The SBC decided against such a database in part because its principle of local autonomy means it can not compel individual churches to report any information.

This is a food blog and not a place to advertise objectionable material that are against my principles.

It goes against my principles to say it but I can't see any other result.

I can maybe understand a team sticking to their principles being only one goal down as a game draws to close, but when you're 2 - 0 down with the clock ticking, you clearly need a plan B. Plan A (get into the final third and make as many sideways passes as possible) hadn't worked at all against West Ham, and with say 10 minutes left, I couldn't believe we didn't just stick Mertesacker upfront with Giroud and hit long balls and early crosses!

I think people who stand up against oppression are brave and patriotic, whether they do so for a principle, or simple self - interest, like not wanting to murdered without consequence to the killer.

Even if Wenger did show some interest, it totally goes against Arsenal's principles when it comes to transfers and finances, so based on that I can not see such a link with Arsenal being true.