Sentences with phrase «not against your spouse»

Step 1: Work with your spouse and not against your spouse.

Not exact matches

There may be reasons arguing against including a spouse as a partner; for example, if you transfer title to your personal assets into your spouse's name to protect your personal property in the event the partnership is sued, the spouse can not have any involvement in the partnership business whatsoever, according to Ennico.

So a woman could not take Christ's Bride, the Church, for her Spouse; the Church can not change the Truth to suit people's ideas of today if it goes against the Truth.

The crime of adultery is not only a grave sin against chastity but equally a grave violation of justice towards the other spouse and towards the children there may be.

1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)

The prodigal left the pig pen and there are so many more verses I could quote NT that warn us!!!! Also you can't tell people they can remarry you when they did willful adultery against their believing spouse because you are agreeing with their sin by so doing.

These reflections can help solve an apparently new moral question that has recently arisen: whether spouses can licitly engage in condomised sex when their motive is not contraceptive but simply to protect one of them against possible HIV infection.

This issue arises when a woman with healthcare through her or her spouse's employer (which is how most of us get healthcare in this country) has an employer who is against contraception and does not want any employees to have access to contraception.

«A house divided against itself...» If you are parenting with a spouse or partner, don't get stuck in good cop / bad cop roles, where one parent is always enforcing the rules and boundaries and the other is not.Aside from causing tension in your relationship, splitting your authority like this gives your teen the message that consequences are all about the «tough» parent being, well, tough.

Do you work together so you kids can't easily pit you and your spouse against each other?

But another brilliant woman also shows that the same argument is used against women who claim to be raped by their spouse or significant other — that it's not the same, it's not rape, it's her fault.

She added that, there is need for the women to be submissive to their spouses while the men should not, under any circumstance, raise their hands against their wives.

When you have Herpes, HPV, HIV or any STD, it can make you feel like you are all alone in the world.If you wish there was a place where you didn't have to worry about being rejected or discriminated against, Online dating is a best way, here you can meet new friends or even a potential spouse, find communal support and get on with your life.

This year, we didn't even have to wait until the results of the BAFTAs before declaring Frances McDormand a lock for raging against dirty cops, abusive spouses, and bowls of Froot Loops throughout Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.

Although sharing passwords with a third - party site, or a spouse, is against the rules, Drew - Lytle says sharing information when someone's incapacitated and a power of attorney is acting on the person's behalf may not violate of those terms, depending on what the power of agreement says.

Also, FHA loans don't work for investment and vacation homes and a spouse's debts can work against you, even if the spouse doesn't co ‐ sign.

For purposes of the means test, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code defines current monthly income as including: «any amount paid by any entity other than the debtor (or in a joint case the debtor and the debtor's spouse), on a regular basis for the household expenses of the debtor or the debtor's dependents (and in a joint case the debtor's spouse if not otherwise a dependent)...» Benefits received under the Social Security Act, payments to victims of war crimes or crimes against humanity on account of their status as victims of such crimes, and payments to victims of international terrorism or domestic terrorism on account of their status as victims of such terrorism are excluded from the means test.

A transmutation that is effective between spouses may not be effective against third parties like creditors.

In this case, her husband has not adequately provided for his spouse and his failure may force her to take legal action against his estate, meaning she would have to sue his executor sons.

Assets left to a surviving spouse, which aren't subject to federal estate and gift taxes, don't count against the exemption amount.

The court has a discretion as to whether repayment should be made by a losing payee spouse; and thus for example «to order repayment unconditionally or subject to a prohibition against enforcement against her without further leave»; but such discretion «should certainly not be equated with that of determining the incidence of costs at the conclusion of an appeal».

Family law mostly boils down to disputes over kids and cash (disputes over restraining orders against the other spouse are not as prevalent as disputes over kids and cash).

If your spouse successfully defended against your claim of adultery, you'd still be able to divorce on other grounds, but not because of the adultery.

With a few exceptions, care provided by a spouse is not something that you can include as an element of your damages and is not a separate claim that your spouse can bring against the negligent party.

When a person marries, s / he gains a variety of rights, including a number of tax benefits, survivor benefits from Social Security, rights under the Family Medical Leave Act, the right not to testify against your spouse and other rights.

This can be in the form of correspondence between you and your spouse that would suggest they should not be left alone with your child, reports or testimony from counselors or parenting evaluators, a restraining order you may have against your spouse or even declarations from character witnesses that feel supervised visitation is called for.

Understand that your claims are not just against the other party but also may include benefits and insurance under your own policy or that you may have through work or your spouse's work.

As it further turns out, the point of her post is not necessarily to counsel against marriage to lawyers as much as to counsel lawyers on how to be better spouses.

It was Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 that provided a mechanism for someone who has not remarried or entered into a civil partnership to bring a claim in England and Wales against a spouse or former spouse even if a court has already made a financial order in divorce proceedings in another jurisdiction.

Historically the law did not recognize the claim of a common - law spouse against the estate of their deceased partner.

The Covenant discriminates against those persons, in that students who are married to opposite sex spouses are not at risk but students who are married to same sex spouses (assuming they are having sex!)

The English courts do not open their doors to just anyone who wishes to take advantage of our divorce laws, but rather requires spouses to demonstrate a real connection to this country, and are constantly on guard against «forum shopping».

A client may also be concerned that a former spouse or civil partner, who has not formed a subsequent marriage or civil partnership, could have a claim against his estate after his death.

On Friday, January 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a tight majority judgment (five: McLachlin, Deschamps, Abella, Cromwell and Karakatsanis, against four: LeBel, Fish, Rothstein and Moldaver) that the Quebec Civil Code discriminates against common - law spouses because it does not grant them the same rights as married couples in regard to spousal support and division of property.

Consider and example where the «battered spouse» doesn't want to testify against his / her abuser.

Every nine seconds, according to domestic violence statistics, a woman is beaten or assaulted in the U.S. Do not wait until you have been attacked to defend yourself against a spouse, live - in boyfriend, domestic partner or family member.

Therefore, you should not put ammunition in the gun for your spouse to use against you.

This requirement creates a safe, non-adversarial environment so that each spouse knows that the other spouse's attorney is not attempting to gather information to use against him or her later in court.

An action for alienation of affections could, however, be brought against any person, not just a lover, who enticed a spouse away from the marital relationship.

Determining whether or not to assert marital fault against your spouse can have an impact on the divorce process.

A default divorce happens when the spouse against whom the divorce is filed (the defendant) doesn't respond within the required time limits.

You will not find that type of language on Family Diplomacy's website, as we believe that spouses should not be pitted against one another...

It was commonly referred to as the rule of spousal incompetency or spousal immunity and it meant that a person could not be compelled to testify against his or her legally married spouse.

«A statement or admission made in such proceedings shall not be admissible in evidence against the person making it or his spouse in proceedings for an offence other than perjury.»

It creates a statutory privilege (like the attorney - client privilege) that, except under limited circumstances, ensures that what is said during a collaborative divorce process can not be used against a spouse in court.

A court order dismissing your spouse's claims against your estate upon death may not prevent a claim if you continue to live together If a person lives with their ex-spouse after they divorce, can he / she make a claim against their...

The Ontario Superior Court decision, reports Law Times, found that a disabled woman's application against the executor of her deceased common - law spouse's estate was not statute barred, as a six - month limitations period did not come into effect until after a litigation guardian was appointed.

Sometimes you hear about Family litigants for whom their dispute against the former spouse has taken on a life of its own, and who will not stop until they have literally exhausted every possible legal and procedural avenue.

Or, if your spouse runs into your vehicle with his car, you normally can't make a claim against the liability coverage on his car.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.