Sentences with phrase «not agree to something»

Here are my two cents: if you read the four statements above and you can not agree to something like this, and if you think that you should not have to develop and adhere to such principles because they remove your freedom of speech, you are very likely a part of the problem and a brick in the wall holding racialized lawyers back.

Do not agree to something you know you can not payback.

«When ordinary people do not agree to something, no one can force them to it.

One of those parties does not agree to something, the deal is off.

Not exact matches

People may perceive your heavy nods as an attempt to show you agree with or understand something that you actually don't.

But by agreeing to do something they might not like or might not believe in, they run the risk of either being good at something they don't like to do, or not doing well because they are unhappy — both of which are bad outcomes.

«They love to make fun of companies when they do something they don't approve of or agree with or just don't like.»

Or a customer argues and cajoles and chips away at our resolve until no becomes maybe and maybe becomes yes, and we wind up agreeing to something we wish we hadn't.

The deal would be structured something like this: The SP agrees to make an investment in your business — to help you cover what the government subsidies don't — in exchange for getting the government to grant them the rights to conduct more business in their country.

And something all the singers agree on, «Maria's not an asset to the abbey.»

Recycling is not free — that's something everyone can agree on — and Waste Management has been pursuing solutions city - by - city to make recycling sustainable and protect itself from losses.

I'm never sure that I haven't forgotten something,» high performers were 21 times less likely to agree than low performers.

This is not something where reasonable people can agree to disagree.

Uber also agreed to notify the Attorney General's office if it begins to collect GPS data from customers» smartphones when they're not using the app, something the company claims it doesn't do, according to BuzzFeed.

Several, including Adam Schefter of ESPN, have reported that Harbaugh's deal with Michigan is not done yet and that the Oakland Raiders are still holding out hope that they will be able to trade for Harbaugh, something Harbaugh would have to agree to.

He agreed, however, that it's an open question: «We are actively asking ourselves about whether or not good governance might mean something different to family firms, and that's the next place we hope to take our research.»

Many long - time followers of the ecosystem will agree that stability is not something that can be artificially created by pegging a given cryptocurrency to a traditional asset.

TeenAnalyst Advice: Two companies usually agree to merge when they feel that they can do something together that they can't do on their own.

Several Tea Party Republicans have said they will not agree to lift the so - called debt ceiling without the White House making several compromises — something the White House has said it will refuse to do.

The agreement was reached after Senate Democrats agreed to set aside their immigration policy demands — something House Democrats may not be willing to do.

Offering, operating, or participating in, any marketing or sales plan or program wherein a participant gives or agrees to give a valuable consideration in return (1) for the opportunity to receive compensation in return for inducing other persons to become participants in the plan or program, or (2) for the opportunity to receive something of value when a person induced by the participant induces a new participant to give such valuable consideration, Provided, That the term «compensation,» as used in this paragraph only, does not mean any payment based on actually consummated sales of goods or services to persons who are not participants in the plan or program and who do not purchase such goods or services in order to participate in the plan or program.

While your main points will likely be similar, I agree with Clark that the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index versus long Treasuries is something of an apple to oranges comparison, since the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index not only includes includes Treasuries, but also government - related and corporate securities, MBS (agency fixed - rate and hybrid ARM pass - throughs), ABS and CMBS (agency and non-agency).

Those put into question your belief in the characteristics of the god, perhaps even the existence of the god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful than yourself has your best interests in mind vs. the idea that we are left to our own devices — especially when you are surrounded by people that agree with and reinforce that idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.

You don't have to agree with it, but give him credit for making a stand for something he believed in.

Well, if there are HUGE moral issues in the bible that we do not agree with as a society in general, you have cherry - picked something to ignore.

Just because a group of stuffy old men desperate to keep their profession relevant agree on something does not make it true.

How can we say we want people to have free choice unless they choose something we don't agree with?

I agree with the big bang guy... if we talk about proof... let's first figure where we all came from... we have all heard this «Well we know what happened after the big bang... but have no clue what came before» well first figure that out... and if you can't in the next 20 years then there has to be something beyond Physics...

You seem to agree that it really doesn't work for one to try to believe something that one does not believe.

When you want something to be true bad enough, you'll find a way to make it so when the material is so ambiguous and easy to interrpret so many different ways, its not shocking to find so many people agreeing with the bible even when they disagree amongst themselves, everyone sees what they want to see.

Chris: The YEC is born from the desire to come up with something science - like to support the bible, so it is because of those few pages in the bible, that you do not agree with Randy (and me).

«The YEC is born from the desire to come up with something science - like to support the bible, so it is because of those few pages in the bible, that you do not agree with Randy (and me).

I don't have to be an authority to believe something and I have read authorities who agree with my belief.

Can't we now all agree that private industry workers are overpaid to pad the bottom line and do something about it?

to let it all hang out, like instead of saying «We don't do this or that anymore» why don't you suggest something and I'll most probably agree to it?

It's so convenient for Christians to quote bible passages when it's something that benefits them, but then leave out all the passages they don't wish to obey or agree with.

They may say that they do because it fits their worldview, but when something doesn't agree with them, they are usually the first to call foul.

As for Israel reclaiming «their» land, since that event is «foretold» in the Bible, that would also be something I would expect Theo to support (again, I don't agree with that idea, but I think I understand where the idea comes from).

Even if you don't agree with something it is good to understand it without bias.

But then, I don't agree with the budget — when less than 5 % of a church budget goes to community outreach or missions, something is terribly wrong.

There are things I don't like or agree with / believe / or think is moral either but that is my opinion and I am not going to tell someone else that they can't do something because I don't like it.

obviously you don't truly agree with what you are going to preach, or you are preaching legalism of some sort, or you're twisting the text to say something it doesn't say, or you really couldn't say what you're planning on saying with integrity, or it's just so frigging boring that you're dreading the thought of keeping yourself awake during it, as well as the people.

It is not unreasonable for someone else to believe something thath does not agree with your opinion.

I'm not religious per se but I agree they shouldn't be required to do something clearly against their beliefs.

We just don't agree that believing something is enough to make it real.

I recall the exact moment when someone said something to me that I didn't agree with.

Someone with a name of «Christina Warrior» (or something like that) claimed to be reporting anything he didn't agree with.

As an example of something that is genetic and natural but which we would all say is wrong: alcoholism (this isn't an attempt to put homosexuality with alcoholism; it is simply an attempt to create a class of behavior which we would all easily agree is both natural, genetic, and wrong).

Again, you don't have to agree with Christians to see that * something * happened.

The question that needs to be asked is, do you promote censorship because something does not agree with your world - view?