«It is a long - established, if
not ancient rule of fairness, that you... Continue Reading →
Not exact matches
Two that at the time, slavery was acceptable and so the
rules only applied to
ancient israelites and
not anymore.
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is
not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but
not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is
not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the
rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an
ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is
not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
Pictures of the terror by which rulers in the
ancient world sought to maintain their authority ought
not to be applied to God's exercise of his
rule and should
not, in my opinion, be used to suggest that Jesus taught that the wicked would burn for ever in hell.
The bible is a collection of documents spread over a thousand years that itself is over 2,000 years old from an
ancient culture no longer extant, and therefore should
not be solely relied upon for a
rule book for modern ethics.»
How concerned are you that you will be sentenced to Tartarus for
not following the
rules of
ancient Greek Mythology?
-- forgetting that
ancient religious writers, unlike scholarly historians, did
not as a
rule feel it incumbent upon them to give, in a footnote or otherwise, their source for every anecdote or event, or to anticipate the modern reader's constant query, «How can we know that what you say is true, in every detail?»
Bottom line is her whole premise was stupid — She was living the
rules of
ancient Judaism
not Christianity, The whole thing is stupid and self promotional.
Many OT,
NT and koran thu - mpers are actually thu - mping the
rules and codes of the
ancients like King Hammurabi and the Egyptians who wrote the Book of the Dead and who did
NOT need revelations from angels or mountain voices to develop needed
rules of conduct for us h - o - minids.
Many OT,
NT and koran thumpers are actually thumping the
rules and codes of the
ancients like King Hammurabi and the Egyptians who wrote the Book of the Dead and who did
NOT need revelations from angels or mountain voices to develop needed
rules of conduct for us hominids.
That simply isn't so anymore which means that the Bible isn't the innerrant Word of God and those
rules are meant for an
ancient culture should be taken with a grain of salt today.
The private water and club
rules of Scottish and Canadian salmon streams do
not exist in the Northwest — every man, woman and child has access to streams and the right to take Steelhead — and there are no revered and
ancient methods.
Dusseault explained that court
rules —
not he — designates documents more than 20 years old as «
ancient.»
In a Daily Politics film, Giles Dilnot looked at how the political wind was blowing now, and why the «
ancient rules just do
not apply any more».
The mtDNA sequence the researchers claimed to have obtained from the fossil is quite common in Europe today, making it difficult to
rule out the possibility that someone
not on the team touched the sample or the lab equipment used in the analysis, says evolutionary geneticist and
ancient DNA expert Hendrik Poinar of McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada.
Although it was just about possible to dismiss A. sediba, with its assortment of
ancient and modern features, as a quirk of human evolution, the new find hints that such «mosaicism» is
not the exception in early humans but the
rule, says Berger.
However, the hypothesis of
ancient population structure within Africa could
not be
ruled out as an alternative explanation.
An
ancient myth of a fabled creature sparks the curiosity of Tinker Bell and her friend Fawn, an animal fairy who's
not afraid to break the
rules to help an animal in need.
But while Strange — a new practitioner of magic — doesn't understand many of the
rules imposed by the
Ancient One, Mordo and Wong follow her lead without question.
There are legions of maxims in the living lore of our common culture, and many, like the Golden
Rule, bear a moral message: «Two wrongs don't make a right» (
ancient Scots); «You are only as good as your word» (early American); «Honesty is the best policy» (Cervantes, Ben Franklin); «It's better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness» (old Chinese proverb).
Siwa isn't the most happening place in
Ancient Egypt, but there is a good amount of commerce, religion, and of course, military
rule to satisfy the small population.
The accepted view now appears to be that such funding arrangements do
not contravene these
ancient rules provided the third - party does
not interfere in the conduct of the action.
Adds the blog South Florida Lawyers, «Also, last I checked, you were
not supposed to share fees with non-lawyers, or is that also one of those
ancient and «dated»
rules like the Geneva Convention?»
Did they forget that in social media, the old
rules and
ancient laws does
not apply?
In this case, the Ontario Labour Relations Board allowed a document to be introduced based on the business records and
ancient document
rules and did
not rely on the statutory provisions for discretion in admitting evidence.