Sentences with phrase «not animals or humans»

Not every animal or human who touches infected animals or objects will become infected; the age, immune status, skin condition and grooming habits of the recipient influence if the fungus is actually able to grow and infect.

Not exact matches

«We also wanted it to be something kids could imagine as anything — we didn't want it to be something they were already familiar with like a four - legged animal or two - legged human — so it has three legs... and one eye.»

We're in love with one other person... we are connected to them in deep ways that only humans (not humans and tools or animals) can be.

I don't know of any legitimate theologians or Scriptural interpretations vouching for humans and animals and tools to get married.

Actually in the universe there is no right or wrong... this is a human invention... animals don't even subscribe to this concept.

@Chad «You seemingly have determined that all animals / humans are essentially the same as rocks...» @ Saraswati Yep, more or less, though I don't use the exact terminology you use in the rest of the sentence regarding determinism, but lets go with «close enough».

Without diving into wether or not animals have souls (which I don't believe) or are even self aware (which I'm also fairly certain they are not), why should I compare instint, non-ceribrial behavior (at best purely sexual) to human?

To me, it's almost obvious that a deity didn't not create the human mind, or the animals mind, or any mind.

You do not have to be a religious zealot or a scientific Luddite to oppose the patenting of animal and human organisms and genes.

Animals can not verbalize their needs or wants, but, humans can communicate what they need or want.

Animals are not humans and I've never read a scripture of Jesus» pertaining to animals having a soul or being responsible for their aAnimals are not humans and I've never read a scripture of Jesus» pertaining to animals having a soul or being responsible for their aanimals having a soul or being responsible for their actions.

It's popular to pretend condemned criminals like Larry Nassar are animals or monsters, not human beings; but Christians do not have that luxury.

[13] This said, in animals lower than humans it is morally permissible to thwart the purposes of bodily organs, so that the Church fully permits the sterilisation of animals (if it doesn't cause unreasonable cruelty to them or damage to the material environment).

The fact that some animals can not reason or talk in language we understand should be as irrelevant to us as is the fact that some humans in relation to whom we have ethical obligations — severely retarded children, for example — can neither reason nor talk.

I am NOT saying that we need to worship the earth, treat animals as more important than humans, or pray to the sun and trees.

Evolution or complex animals can not be observed in the single lifetime of a human.

It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?

A god which would demote itself to mortal form and die, not take sides with good, bad, human or animal.

Nothing like being called a depraved animal, a rat, scum, garbage, less than human or any of the other names that atheists get called on a regular basis, not to mention no threats of eternal torture.

Human personality and culture are inherently about the denial of death, about helping the human animal achieve day - to - day equanimity in the face of our existential burden and helping us manage our instinct for self - preservation in the face of a cognitive awareness that we are bound for death, that we can not run away or escape our Human personality and culture are inherently about the denial of death, about helping the human animal achieve day - to - day equanimity in the face of our existential burden and helping us manage our instinct for self - preservation in the face of a cognitive awareness that we are bound for death, that we can not run away or escape our human animal achieve day - to - day equanimity in the face of our existential burden and helping us manage our instinct for self - preservation in the face of a cognitive awareness that we are bound for death, that we can not run away or escape our fate.

For the talk about the natural changes of human life over the years, together with what externally happened there, is not in essence any different from talking of plant or of animal life.

I am not arguing that God gave us this consciousness by a special act or that this is what separates human beings from all other animals.

At best Braine shows thathuman beings have an existence that transcends the body because they have language, but he does not show how or why only human beings and not other higher animals possess transcendence when they are all alike psycho - physical beings, because animals are not to be explained mechanistically either.

When either our animal or our primeval ancestors were not given the responsibility for our plight the blame was shifted to the social institutions which corrupt human nature.

Considering his use elsewhere of the phrase, «thinking animal,» one can only suppose that here, too, it refers to man, or a human being, in contrast to other kinds of animals who feel but can not think, or, at any rate, can not think that they think (1970a, 94; 1971, 208).

Popper indeed believes that the reduction of chemistry to physics, of biology to chemistry, of animal conscious or subconscious experience to biology, and of consciousness itself and the creativeness of the human mind to animal experience, are all problems the complete success of which seems most unlikely if not impossible.

Human groundwater contamination can be related to waste disposal (private sewage disposal systems, land disposal of solid waste, municipal wastewater, wastewater impoundments, land spreading of sludge, brine disposal from the petroleum industry, mine wastes, deep - well disposal of liquid wastes, animal feedlot wastes, radioactive wastes) or not directly related to waste disposal (accidents, certain agricultural activities, mining, highway deicing, acid rain, improper well construction and maintenance, road salt).

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

Example in point: Opposition to embryonic stem cell / human cloning research: It isn't anti science to oppose treating nascent human life like a corn crop or manufacturing embryos, anymore than it is anti science than the Animal Welfare Act the proscribes what can and can't be done in scientific research with some mammals.

madtown, The evolutionary process that effect His will is not interventionary in its process, it follows the law of nature, God is not Human, we are only part of Him, our wisdom is infinitesimaly small, The reason is beyond us, just like History, it is only after thousands or millions of years that we understood why it happened, for example, Why the dynasours got extinct, millions of years ago, to pave the way for smaller animals and ultimately humans, Thats why to apply the present human logic on history is illogically simpliHuman, we are only part of Him, our wisdom is infinitesimaly small, The reason is beyond us, just like History, it is only after thousands or millions of years that we understood why it happened, for example, Why the dynasours got extinct, millions of years ago, to pave the way for smaller animals and ultimately humans, Thats why to apply the present human logic on history is illogically simplihuman logic on history is illogically simplistic.

I bring the conversation up because it came to mind last week when I was reading about a Christian ethicist so passionately committed to defending the (unmistakably) exceptional nature of human beings that he thinks it necessary to forbid his children any sentimental solicitude for the suffering of beasts, and to disabuse them of the least trace of the dangerous fantasy or pathetic fallacy that animals experience anything analogous to human emotions, motives, or needs; they can not really, he insists, know anxiety, grief, regret, or disappointment, and so we should never allow them to divert our sympathies or ethical longings from their proper object.

For example, if man were defined as essentially a rational animal, rationality could not admit of degrees, and «more» of it would not constitute a norm or an ideal, without entailing that some human beings are less «human» than others.

Also a human person or metazoan animal is not merely a single individual but many individuals on various levels.

He / she / it, is just another atheist who can't understand that having or practicing a religion is one of those traits that separates and differentiates us HUMAN beings from animals.

The reduction of chemistry to physics, of biology to chemistry, of animal conscious or subconscious experience to biology, and of consciousness itself and the creativeness of the human mind to animal experience, are all problems that are unlikely if not impossible to succeed.

This not only represents a huge impact on what is available for humans, but it is a disproportionate share for only one of 30 million or so species of animals!

It must be remembered... that emotion in human experience, or even in animal experience, is not bare emotion.

(We will not even count the space needed for the humans, breathing space for all of the animals, or for the internal structure of the «Ark» itself.)

But at the same time, rightly enough, it would be insisted that Whitehead's immediate experience can not be conflated with Bradley's; for in Whitehead, immediate experience operates as foundational only within the limited area of animal or human cognition and can not, as in Bradley's idealist metaphysic, be identified with the substratum itself.

Well believers or not, lets say that all living things «plants, small animals and humans» were to attempt to join as one, reproduce, how long would life exist?

The desert weather in the winter although might not have snow it becomes so much colder than at yours since it is being open to the cold dry or humid winds that could break the bones of any human or animal if not well covered with wool and protected by some thing from direct blows... heat is there during sunrise and sunset but after that it is too much to bear.

It is not properly applied to animals or machines since it is a human quality, a moral virtue, that a person may have or lack, may have in a high or low degree, may develop or may lose.

They are not limited to humans, or even just to animals.

Another issue I have with all this is that even if someone is gay what affect does that have on your own personal life, it has nothing to do with you, just because you don't believe in it or don't accept it doesn't mean you can treat gay people wrongly (that's a sin also) they're not animals they are human beings..

Out of the Earth ~ Natural Raw Diet for Dogs Many of the commercial dog food companies would have us believe that they actually use human grade meat in the production of their food, when in fact the sources of this «meat» are not even fit for animal consumption.In some areas of North America this list can also include euthanized companion animals from clinics and shelters, roadkill, zoo animals, livestock which die from disease or disability.The «meat» is purchased from a rendering plant which also receives material from slaughterhouses such as hair, feathers, hooves and any part of the mammal which is condemned for human consumtion.

Many of the commercial dog food companies would have us believe that they actually use human grade meat in the production of their food, when in fact the sources of this «meat» are not even fit for animal consumption.In some areas of North America this list can also include euthanized companion animals from clinics and shelters, roadkill, zoo animals, livestock which die from disease or disability.The «meat» is purchased from a rendering plant which also receives material from slaughterhouses such as hair, feathers, hooves and any part of the mammal which is condemned for human consumtion.

Not only is it cruel and inhumane to animals, intensive farming or factory farming is responsible for the over use of antibiotics which is extremely harmful to human health too.

The FDA reviewed studies in human beings and animals and determined that sucralose does not cause reproductive or neurological risk to human beings.

For crops that are not harvested, due to cost or other constraints, but are wholesome for human or animal consumption, explore partnerships and opportunities with secondary markets, feed operations, or non - profit / volunteer groups to reduce or eliminate cost, transport, and / or labor barriers.

And even if you think those things do constitute re-homing, death, or abandonment, I strongly believe that an animal's quality of life shouldn't be of less importance than a human's.