Sentences with phrase «not applying science»

Then I thought, why am I not applying science to my music?

Just because you're Christian doesn't mean you can't apply science and engineering principles.

It gets people not to just work intensely, but it forces people to recruit both types of their fast - twitch muscle cells, an area many other programs ignore, and simply don't apply the science.

Not exact matches

Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh also agrees by saying «I think everyone should get a little exposure to computer science because it really forces you to think in a slightly different way, and it's a skill that you can apply in life in general, whether you end up in computer science or not.»

Different administrators have come to different conclusions about how best to apply the law in view of the science, and many of their decisions have been challenged in court, sometimes successfully, for either going too far or not far enough.

The oldest technical research university in the US, Rensselaer Polytechnic is grounded by two principles: Help students apply science to everyday life, and use teaching methods not used in a typical classroom.

1) It's worked in every other field we've applied to so far in science so why not in these cases as well?

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

same could be said for Science as it is constantly changing and evolving and what is considered the constant today may not apply thousands of years from now just as what was Fact a few thousand years ago is not today.

It really does nt matter what my beliefs system was, let's just say it was based on chaos theory and science as applied to occult arts, I have since moved on to more pragmatic beliefs but I clearly recall how oppressive they were and surprised at how much propaganda they spread that was based on their ignorance.

If science is so much a part of your life, then why don't you apply a bit of it to your god.

These laws did not cease to be true when science passed beyond them to the investigation of elements in the universe to which they do not apply.

Funny how people don't apply the same kind of «it must all be wrong because it's impossible to know the truth» logic when it comes to science

Some of the insights provided by the first phase of liberation theology seem too important to let slip between the cracks — for instance, the centrality of the category «the poor» for biblical interpretation; the awareness of structural, not just individual, evil; the use of the social sciences as dialogue partner for theological discourse; and the need to apply a hermeneutic of suspicion to theology itself.

Now, one could of course say that interreligious studies (or, if you prefer, comparative theology) should not be considered a science, so that this canon does not apply.

Does not even know the term theory and how it applies to science!

As Peter Alexander has pointed out, these conditions do not apply to «science and religion».12 They do not refer to the same entity.

This subsection itself bears comparison with Chapter II of Science and the Modern World; again it is entirely congenial to Whitehead's approach, if indeed it is not his own statement of it, that is reflected in the openings of subsections» (a) Nature of number,»» (b) Fundamental concepts of geometry,» and» (c) Nature of applied mathematics The theme of starting with clear principles in mathematics has run throughout Whitehead's earlier work, particularly his lectures on the teaching of mathematics and his textbook.

The term moderate evolution might therefore be applied to a theory which simply inquires into the biological reality of man in accordance with the formal object of the biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that human biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance with the fundamental methodological principles of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality of man and to the origin of this whole reality.

At the time Thornton had closely read The Concept of Nature (1920) and Principles of Natural Knowledge (2d edition, 1925), tended to interpret Science and the Modern World (1925) in line with these earlier works, and was acquainted with Religion in the Making (1926) though somewhat unsure what to make of its doctrine of God.2 He took comfort in Whitehead's remark concerning the immortality of the soul, and evidently wanted to apply it to all theological issues: «There is no reason why such a question should not be decided on more special evidence, religious or otherwise, provided that it is trustworthy.

And this applies not just to the laws of matter, but to the whole of the human world - to the ebb and flow of history and of progress in science, culture and religion.

The problem I have with athiests is that, although they state that they believe in science, they don't apply it properly.

Needless to say this implies no derogation of science or gnosis — it means only that one does not apply intellectual criteria to all things human and that one states in a new way that man is not only a subject for knowledge but is also a subject in the process of making his own existence.

Accordingly, Whitehead does not merely say that science should avoid becoming «scientism» by recognizing that there are dimensions of reality to which its categories do not apply.

CNN: Bulgarian bones could be John the Baptist's as claimed, scientists say When the tools of modern science are applied to religious relics, the results are almost always the same: Science says the relics aren't what their supportersscience are applied to religious relics, the results are almost always the same: Science says the relics aren't what their supportersScience says the relics aren't what their supporters claim.

But if you were to discover the meaning of theory, as it applies to science, you would discover that all theories are not created equal, and that evolution is much better supported by evidence and applicability than religion.

Griffin & Sherburne New York: The Free Press, 1978, 8) Like the paradigms used in science, the criteria are comprehensiveness (applying to all the facts), consistency (not contradictory in different areas) and fruitfulness (producing further insights not anticipated).

Do not confuse Scientific Method applied to Law and Natural Science.

It is our best friend in life if we learned and not taken issues in to our hands as Gods on Earth a-busing or applying force but by the power of the science «Sultan» in Sura» t Al - Rahman through which we are told will be able to penetrate Heavens Hight «s God Allah permits..

For Lewis the enemy is not true science, fueled by a love of truth, but that applied science whose practitioners are motivated by a love of power.

I am constantly shaking my head at writers and media who seem not to understand the medical facts or science regarding birth control and because of that mislead readers about the truth about birth control and what it does and doesn't do and the truth around so - called religious objections as it applies to the health care law.

This is also indicated by the aim of IM as enunciated in chapter one: «The object of the following chapters is not so much to teach mathematics, but to enable the students from the very beginning of their course to know what the science is about, and why it is necessarily the foundation of exact thought as applied to natural phenomena» (IM 2).

This applies not only to science and to everyday life, but to politics, economics, morality, and religion.

The difference is when you attempt to apply science to an area that does not avail itself to science.

As a Christian, these are sentiments I find apply not only to the staggering beauty of science, but also to the infinite goodness of God.

The speculation that it was in a «section on preaching to the «half breeds» / Samaritans» might be some handy way someone sections off that section of the book, but to assume every incident within a certain part of scripture is there like a Science book identifying the phylum and genus of an animal, that is, that everything mentioned under the Raccoon Family is in the Raccoon Family (the ring - tail cat, kinkajou, coatimundi... three other members of the raccoon family), is an assumption that does not seem to apply to the Bible and how it is written... it is more human, and living, and not sterile, everything in its tight little unmovable section, etc..

Now apply that mad science to the world of hot - n - spicy.

Whether this marks a reversal of the worldwide trend to automation or not remains to be seen, but it has certainly set back science as applied to football.

Not sure if science applies to each matchup so I will abstain from those that I can't come up with anything.

Why do we not simply stop and apply some real data or science.

Any method that is applied with the claim of being the only one that is right or the only one that works is most likely marketing, and not science.

This build a bird nest challenge for kids gets kids thinking creatively and applying imagination to science!

Political science is useless to that topic - I'm not sure how Condorcet method apply to drug policies at all

Having worked on yeast genetics during his academic career, when Mark West decided that he just wasn't happy in research any more, he realised that perhaps he could apply his skills in California's wine industry — an industry that is part art, part science.

I think there is certainly a world view that surgeons like to cut and don't think deeply, but I have found my surgical colleagues to be some of the most interested in learning the basic science and then trying to apply it.

This is not just an impressive way to apply science.

In practice, however, the ban — which applies to wells using more than a certain amount of fluid — will eliminate the most attractive sites because drillers now won't «have enough water» to operate effectively, says Robert Jackson, a professor of environmental earth system science at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.

Those who pursued nonscience or applied science degrees («artsies,» as my mechanical engineering father and brother called them) were not up to the challenge to succeed in the real world of numbers and rigorous scientific experimentation.

This process is not typical for the women - in - science issue, but applies to any field where minorities are involved, be they black people in a white environment or young people in an old one.

A recent publication from the European Science Foundation * shows that, increasingly, applying for open positions is not the only way to become a principal investigator.