Sentences with phrase «not as a rebuttal»

Not exact matches

As Hitched.com editor Steve Cooper put it in a rebuttal to the Facebook divorce stories, this has been the case since the times of our caveman friend Blaaarggg: «I'm sure at some point during the Stone Age a woman was frustrated because her mate wouldn't step away from the fire and come to bed.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

Please don't respond with a rebuttal from personal experience, I'm not interested as we could go back and forth like that forever, and, admittedly, this is not the proper forum for this conversation.

Hartshorne's rebuttal is twofold: 69 «The assumption of a divine simultaneity need not mean that some actual perspective in the world is «right» as against others.

I found you site because I was trying to respond to a youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRH8wyWNOP4) I didn't agree with and I found you information to be helpful and I wanted to use some of it as a quote to rebuttal the comments made to dishonor Jesus Christ.

When rebuttal is unsuccessful or correction of the noncompliance is not completed within the prescribed time period, the certifying agent or State organic program's governing State official shall send the certified operation a written notification of proposed suspension or revocation of certification of the entire operation or a portion of the operation, as applicable to the noncompliance.

While most laypeople won't likely want to read the entire analysis and rebuttal of Wax's work, it is significant because these researchers pretty much refute all of Wax's work and show, step by step, how flawed the study was and how referencing this study as a basis for decision making is also flawed.

As for Mark M, I'm not sure if it's worth waiting for him to come up with a coherent rebuttal, after three attempts that will be scored as «played and missed»As for Mark M, I'm not sure if it's worth waiting for him to come up with a coherent rebuttal, after three attempts that will be scored as «played and missed»as «played and missed».

The taking of the key seats is also seen as a rebuttal of Corbyn's decision to appoint controversial political allies to the leader's office as well as a warning to Corbyn not to continue challenging existing party policy, such as nuclear defence.

«Some of these things, as much as the stories are bad, and I will sit here and say false, I think sometimes official rebuttals, effective official rebuttals can cure the mischief and then we can move on so that it doesn't attract undue attention for institutions of state,» he advised.

But the Abuakwa South lawmaker in a sharp rebuttal described Ayariga's argument as unfortunate and hollow, arguing that the constitution has not spelt out guidelines for the appointment of Ministers under a particular government.

But Mr. Boako in a rebuttal assured that government with the help of the Minerals Commission will not flout the rules as far as mining of Bauxite is concerned.

But in a rebuttal, the Member of Parliament for Abuakwa South constituency, described Ayariga's argument as unfortunate and hollow, arguing that the constitution had not spelt out guidelines for the appointment of Ministers under a particular government.

Shermer's article is a shallow and tendentious treatment of a complex subject that does not take proper account of rebuttals to critical attacks on the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, in which a comet strike more than 12,000 years ago caused the megafaunal extinction in North America, and misrepresents the state of the argument around my theory that this event wiped out an advanced human society as well.

Lomborg claims in his rebuttal that «Holdren could find little but a badly translated word and a necessary specification for nuclear energy production in this chapter».8 Actually, as my original critique indicated to the extent practical in the space available, and as Lomborgs rebuttal and this response make even plainer, his energy chapter is so permeated with misunderstandings, misreadings, misrepresentations, and blunders of other sorts that it can not be considered a positive contribution to public or policy - maker understanding, notwithstanding its managing to get right a few (already well known) truths about the subject.

Duane Reed, the current president of the Minneapolis NAACP, even denounced the program as «not working» in 2008, leading to a rebuttal from the former director of school of choice programs, Morgan Brown (now assistant education commissioner to Arne Duncan in D.C.), that the program is doing what it's supposed to do, «providing equal access» to school options.

The sensible family haulers were well positioned to weather a financial drought as the rebuttal to a criticism that GM couldn't build a car that people actually wanted.

I see you want to cast aspersions here and I bet you believed you were being clever when claiming you were doing an ad hominem attack; you weren't, by the way, you specifically mentioned that you were attacking an argument and ad hominem would be an attack on my person as a rebuttal to my argument)

But rebuttals to Howey's viewpoint from sites such as this one argue that Amazon is not actually a bookstore, and therefore doesn't deserve the 30 % take.

Putting the Switch's problems on pause for a moment, some voices within the gaming industry have begun to list rebuttals as to why the console may not be as doomed as its initial presentation implied.

pat - «Similarly many environmental activists believe that man's influence is a form of sin and nature (Gaea) will soon strike back...» You can phrase the position of a fictitious group any way you want of course, without rebuttal, because they don't really exist, though there are people who fit the description — especially if by «many» you mean more than three — but the more accurate reality is most of the human beings you would lump under the rubric «environmentalist» would more accurately be described as believing that short - sighted and greedy human attempts at total control and domination and complete disregard for the healthof the environment have gotten us out of balance with what was an interlocking web of balanced and dynamic systems, and would appear to have unbalanced many of those systems as well, including the still poorly understood cycles of climate; or weather, as we laymen call it.

Then, a comparable survey average - voter types, asking what they think of «I can't find a single point that he has scored» as a rebuttal — was that convincing, for them?

If you are genuinely worried about your own future as your Hansen rebuttal is suggesting, then isn't it possible that you could still make $ squillions and be a very SAFE Enviro - Hero by turning HDR GEOTHERMAL into reality without compromising current business?

Later that day, Gavin accepted the comment (now posted up as # 44 and bearing the date - time stamp of Oct. 28 9:18 a.m.) I am pleased to learn that the posting delays for my post were simply due to it being the weekend and not due to any intent on Gavin's part to suppress «serious discussion or rebuttals».

And don't be fooled by the «explanations» they give as rebuttals..

Dagfinn, I think McKitrick's position is better described as «basically flawed», in that neither MM04 nor MM07 prove the purported point, whether or not he has a «marginally valid» point that the AR4 rebuttal was less than complete.

This means there are now 3 levels of rebuttals addressing the skeptic argument «humans aren't causing global warming»: If other climate bloggers are interested in allowing their existing articles to be used as advanced rebuttals to skeptic arguments, please contact me.

I don't think one should (or needs to) present it as a rebuttal to the global cooling meme when the temperature trend is still as high today as it was in 1997.

I'm trying to point out how AGW fisics is created by sleights of hand by tweaking real physics and promoted as «real world» by manipulating those taught this by giving them even more stupid reasons which they give as rebuttals, which they can't see are stupid because they don't known the real world physics which shows how stupid the rebuttals.

This is the same NPR which permitted book excerpts from Laurie David featuring a false accolade about Ross Gelbspan, the same radio network which allowed Gelbspan to prominently mention his favorite leaked memo «accusation» bits where zero time was allotted for rebuttal, the same radio network which interviewed him more than one time, and the same radio network which years later featured Al Gore's bit about the infamous «smoking gun leaked industry memo phrase» «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» where the NPR writer offered not one word of curiosity about that awkward phrase.

As far as I can see, and typical of «rebuttals» from both, the explanations given change depending on the questions asked, there's no internal coherence in C / AGWSF as it was designed to obfuscate not educatAs far as I can see, and typical of «rebuttals» from both, the explanations given change depending on the questions asked, there's no internal coherence in C / AGWSF as it was designed to obfuscate not educatas I can see, and typical of «rebuttals» from both, the explanations given change depending on the questions asked, there's no internal coherence in C / AGWSF as it was designed to obfuscate not educatas it was designed to obfuscate not educate.

This post has been adapted into the rebuttal to the argument «Earth hasn't warmed as much as expected».

I'll tend to use points raised in the article as a jumping off point for general musings, rather than a detailed rebuttal since I haven't read the book that Sheehan is discussing.

Er, not quite, no, as this exquisitely damning rebuttal from the Global Warming Policy Forum makes clear.

As far as I remember, there was just a small list of studies in Soon & Baliunas, 2003 which did NOT show a MWP, and almost all of them involved co-authors of the Eos «rebuttal»As far as I remember, there was just a small list of studies in Soon & Baliunas, 2003 which did NOT show a MWP, and almost all of them involved co-authors of the Eos «rebuttal»as I remember, there was just a small list of studies in Soon & Baliunas, 2003 which did NOT show a MWP, and almost all of them involved co-authors of the Eos «rebuttal».

But, no, proponents don't know enough basic physics and deny the free fall fact, so, as I said, objective, scientific rebuttal is impossible [and not necessary — just as it is not necessary to prove in learned journals that the moon is not made of green cheese].

Gladly as far a rebuttals are concerned, I'm not the one who wishes to be converted by a debunking review.

All that's worth it only if the main substance of the argument, especially when you're building up as though there is such a main rebuttal, is not so poor.

That sort of agreement is not pushed in a democracy, it is pushed in a fake news misinformation environment where critics are said to deny something they don't deny, while being portrayed as corrupted when they are not, concerning a situation portrayed to be a problem under false premises, where zero rebuttal is permitted by those pushing this so - called agreement.

Such rebuttal material was probably viewed as potentially fatal for enviro - activists, and from all I've found, it appears they took a practically unknown pilot project PR campaign from the Western Fuels Association and blew it out of all proportion in order to have some kind of plausible - sounding «evidence» for their claim that skeptic climate scientists were no different than the paid shill experts who claimed cigarette smoking was not especially harmful.

However, as you can see by reading carefully through the 561 comments on the Montford post to which the current post is a rebuttal, Gavin has declined to extend the discussion at RC and has not posted follow up comments from a number of substantive and polite commentaters here.

That was not the case here, and thus Hansen can afford himself the liberties of presenting his case as a defense lawyer if you will and with no scientific rebuttal.

Note: this post has been incorporated into the new rebuttal to the myth «No long tail means climate sensitivity is low», as well as «global warming stopped in [insert date]» and «Trenberth can't account for the lack of warming».

Regarding Trenberth, having looked at the slides, I don't see Roger's interpretation, personally, but on the other hand I don't find his accusation of «recklessness» nearly as ad - hom as Eli's quite sarcastic and personal rebuttal post.

While we don't necessarily share the Senator's view of the article on the whole (we felt it provided a relatively balanced discussion of the details and conclusions of the study in question), we do find some concern in the fact that the views of Myron Ebell (who actually works for the «Competitive Enterprise Institute», and not the more venerable «American Enterprise Institute» referred to by the Senator), were offered as a rebuttal to the conclusions of a team of respected scientists.

-- possibly not the brevity that a hopeful journal author might aspire to as a rebuttal.

Thursday, July 24, 10:49 AM: Monckton responds with the «rebuttal» article, as he posted to his website and Eli linked to above, with my article included in full, and a prefatory statement that it was from «Dr. Arthur Smith, American Physical Society», which was not in the original.

As shown in the Intermediate level rebuttal of this argument, dozens of studies have concluded that the Sun simply can not account for the recent global warming, but here we'll go through the calculations for ourselves.

[52] I thus conclude that what is referred to in Rule 11 - 6 (4) is not akin to rebuttal evidence such as that called by a plaintiff in response to a defendant's case, with its consequent limitations.

[53] As such, it has inherent limitations, but not necessarily the same limitations that Henderson J imposed on the true rebuttal evidence he was dealing with in C.N. Rail, supra.