With that in mind, use any data you collect as an indicator of progress,
not as absolute truth.
Not exact matches
The bible is a historical record of many things... but quoting passages that represent a great variety of differing views
as if each one is some sort of proof of
absolute self evident and unquestionable
truth not going to convince.
As I grew up I found out that people took the story as absolute truth and I couldn't understand i
As I grew up I found out that people took the story
as absolute truth and I couldn't understand i
as absolute truth and I couldn't understand it.
Son of blessed Mary, Easu, Anointed one was a Hebrew, dedicated to
truth absolute,
not a hindu Jew» filthy self centered, secular
as you hind, lie to make a point.
It's
not a negation of
truth or
absolute truth, it's just a recognition that we might be
as confused over things
as our kin in the faith who chained up Bibles, burned the bones of reformers, tossed bombs into the basements of black churches and burned crosses on the front yards of black people, who ignore the plight of the homeless and the poor while we struggle to decide between the 36 and 72 inch plasma screen tv.
@glenn, he was referring to
absolute truth in religious terms, which there obviously is
not as can be seen from the innumerable religions.
atheism tells us to ask questions and
not just accept archaic answers
as absolute truth.
Even while preaching
absolute truth, propositions, sin, and hell, Keller will quote the Apostle Paul in the same breath
as a quote from Bono, and all to make a point meaningful to his congregation,
not to win cool points.
That
not everyone recognizes this
absolute for what it is changes nothing; psychologically speaking, a «subjective
absolute» fulfills exactly the same function
as absolute truth does for those who believe in a revealed religion.»
One aspect I absolutely admire about Hinduism is that they do
not shove their version of
truth on the others
as «the
absolute unequivocal
truth you better follow, or else -».
If the traditional formulations of God show him to be the Perfect Good,
Absolute Truth and Supreme Being, since goodness, truth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolu
Truth and Supreme Being, since goodness,
truth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolu
truth and being are positive values, then there should
not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity
as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us
as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolution.
Since Jesus Christ founded the Catholic Church and placed good men in charge of it, and because it was the Catholic Church which put the Books of the Bible in the Bible and coined the word «Bible», and because the Bible tells us that the Church is the pillar and foundation of
Truth, and because these good men [that you refer to
as misguided] are the ones ordained and «sent», [just like Jesus was «sent» by the Father], are at the «helm» of His Church and have the
absolute authority to interpret the Bible, I am so inclined to be ever so thankful that Jesus Christ set it all up this way so that the burdens and crosses that I may bear will become
as light
as the yoke that Jesus Christ promised if we are willing to follow him, and
not our will be done but His.
Without an «
Absolute Source» of truth, there is no absolute truth, yet you argue herein as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that ther
Absolute Source» of
truth, there is no
absolute truth, yet you argue herein as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that ther
absolute truth, yet you argue herein
as if there must be, and you want us to «believe» that there is while arguing out the other side of your mouth that there isn't.
Science is
not the source, but a medium to reach
truth absolute of a matter,
not as hindu's, ignorant s hind, absurd in their hindusim, absurdity, The source.
No I do
not (and it's a fair point), but I do insult idiots who try to «sell» myth
as science — it's truly insulting... and damaging to the youth of this country who are taught this
absolute distortion of the
truth
to defy soul, desire pleasing hindu secularism, filthy self center ism of a hindu terrorist, criminal self centered,
not as you hind absurd by laying it on
truth absolute GOD, hindu monkey, stupid atheist.
And no a belief does
not mean actual knowledge, so when one proclaims a belief, it something that by definition can
not be proven, so no I don't have to present evidence in order to declare a belief, but if one is saying outright that angels do
not exist
as being the
absolute truth, then one should present evidence.
Her blog post can be summed up
as «I encountered a gap in my knowledge that I could
not provide an
absolute truth to explain so I decided that if I couldn't provide that answer I would just accept someone else's
truth».
Granted, we might say that the proposition «if x is an intellect, then x distorts reality by spatializing it» is an analytical
truth akin to «if x is a bachelor, then x is unmarried,» and Bergson would even accept this (CE 270), so long
as we are simply drawing implications about things we have already defined.12 But Bergson does
not treat any definition
as unrevisable,
absolute or permanent.
Faith means trust and to trust, one has to obey
as master commanded,
not by hinduism, absurdity of a pot head hindu pagan, spewing his hinduism, denial of
truth absolute on his name.
If it can be proven that «God does
not exist» then I will accept it
as an «
absolute truth.»
hinduism, fabrication is the way of follower's of hindu Mithra sim, pagan savior ism, labeled
as Christianity, Way of hindu Jew's, filthy secular s to justify their hinduism illegality by a reason,
not truth absolute.
But, unless you have access to some «
absolute / unequivocal * proof * that I'm
not aware of, respectfully, your postings are coming across «
as if» you * know * *
absolute truth.
Sunism and Shia ism are cults, denial of
truth absolute GAWD, based
not on true teachings of Mullahs, but muslim ism corruption of true teachings, based on Mithra ism, criminal savior ism, to justify Suni criminal King's or Amir's, another word for a self centered Shia sanatan, filthy goon to be free of La,
truth, ism's,
not truth, wahabism, corruption of
truth absolute, labeled
as religion's.
truth absolute God
as her foundation,
not law, hinduism corruption of
truth, word La,
as you hindu absurd in your post.
When pressed about the unfairness of disqualifying their opponents a priori, naturalists sometimes portray themselves
as merely insisting upon a proper definition of «science,» and
not as making any
absolute claims about «
truth.»
Human exist by understanding,
not by any physical form,
Truth absolute GOD is realized by understanding, not by visualization, as a hindu atheist, ignorant self centered expect truth absolute GOD t
Truth absolute GOD is realized by understanding,
not by visualization,
as a hindu atheist, ignorant self centered expect
truth absolute GOD t
truth absolute GOD to be.
hinduism, absurdity of a hindu, ignorant, spewing his hinduism absurdities
as truth absolute, Ellah, Ellohim or Allah have the same meanings,
not a moon but, AL, The, LA, limit, H, most high or
absolute, meaning The
truth absolute 360 *, un divide able.
Sunism and Shia ism are hinduism, denial of
truth absolute Allah, based
not on true teachings of Islam, but hinduism corruption of true teachings, based on hindu Mithra ism, criminal savior ism, to justify hindu criminal King's or Amir's, another word for a self centered hindu sanatan, filthy goon to be free of La,
truth, ism's,
not truth, hinduism, corruption of
truth absolute, labeled
as religion's.
Jeremy and Glenn — I don't think that Brian would say he doesn't believe in
absolute truth — I could be wrong but I think he would say something like... he doesn't believe that any human has (at least up to this point) been able to know
absolute truth and that he believes there is a lot more of
absolute truth to be known and that he doesn't believe that it is
as narrow or «little»
as so many try to make it.
However, scientific
truth which keeps on changing can obviously
not be taken either by faith (that's
not what science is) nor
as an
absolute truth, since it is subject to change.
Muslims are
not of one physical color, nor is humanity,
as hindu's, racist hind, absurd in their hinduism, racism, but of one color, of spirit of
truth, any one of any place is of color of
truth absolute, Muslim, and their are many of English and welsh heritage, proud to name their son Mohammad, Spirit of
truth.
Just hinduism, speculation, Founding fathers figured out
truth behind hinduism, corruption of
truth called religions and adapted
truth absolute God
as their way, it was
not just the bickering of hindu gentile ignorant slave Christians, but a desire to dump hinduism, racism
as foundation of America.
Why folwloer of hindu Mithra ism, pagan savior ism labeled
as Christianity are
not welcome by Muslim's, To know causes of mayhem among humanity, handy work of hindu Jew's, criminal self centered, denier of
truth absolute and thir hinduism, fabrication, hindu Mithra ism pagan savior ism, labeled
as Christianity, please visit http://www.limitisthetruth.com/blog.html and click on word Choice to open file.
Does
not this suggest that, by using the degree of complexity
as a guide, we may advance very much more surely than by following any other lead
as we seek to penetrate to the
truth of the world and to assess, in terms of
absolute values, the relative importance, the place, of all things?
God, constant is
not a mystery,
as you hind, speculate from hindism, ignorance, but fact of life,
truth absolute, nothing can exist without, and foundation of American Consti tution.
What is
not an «
absolute truth» of «Hope»
as «choice» if / when it always exists whether we choose to do or
not do?
But I give you these things,
not as my opinion — I give them to you
as divine
truths which are
absolute.
Human beings outside your head don't even need to turn up for the process to be set in motion — all they need do is continue to perpetuate the same toxic memes and dogmas where the garbage originates
as «
absolute truth».
and also, googling information on the internet is
not the same
as finding it in the Scripture, though their is alot of good information giving knowledge on the Bible, it is
not to be replaced with going to God's Word for
truth, i still cant believe you are claiming to be a christian and you also claim that the Bible is
not a Holy instrument of God, and that Paul speaks things that arent
absolute truth, this is nonsense to any child of God.
Islam,
as people know today, was Hebrew teachings or teachings of son of blessed Mary, was never about religion, but
truth absolute Thin Allah, so much so, word religion did
not exist in Hebrew language or in even in Qu «ran, there is no such thing
as religion, but Thin Allah, consti tution of America, other wise known
as Law of West.
In my view, your thinking is based on certain assumptions, but you don't realise that they are assumptions, you seem to regard them
as absolute truth.
@
truth: You weren't there, so you might want to make such
as - sertions of
absolutes.
@Mass Debater «I have read many works that study the history of the Jewish people and their culture
as found apart from biblical sources, I have yet to find one that did
not include supposition about the veracity of it's own work, with none claiming
absolute truth as to who the authors of the bible or who the historical figure of Moses could have been.»
People who are certain that they have the benefits of
Absolute Truth see it
as a duty to force - feed it to the benighted people that they are certain do
not.
The problem is that many don't see that there is such a thing
as natural law,
as absolute truth - some things are always bad, like murder, and some things are always good, like snuggling and holding babies.
But in healthy families,
truth is accepted
as not absolute.
Berlyne, author of an interesting but very mechanistic theory of experimental aesthetics, finds himself the keynote speaker in a chapter which, after some elementary physiology of the human eye, is almost entirely metaphysical, discussing at length the
absolute truths expressed in mathematics and, by analogy, in music, and posing the question
as to whether God did or did
not put them there for mathematicians and musicians to find.
I do
not present my suggestions
as an «
absolute truth», that would just be silly, don't you think?
I'm
not claiming to know anything
as being
absolute truth.