Sentences with phrase «not as neutral»

These approaches have been chosen to create rich combinations, not as the neutral picturing of reality, but as a way of coming to terms with it.

Bill Lipton, New York State director of the Working Families Party, said Jennifer DiSomma's hiring shows that Schaffer is not as neutral in the Assembly race as he says he is.

Not necessarily a bad thing, just not as neutral a flavor as some of the other things.

(ENTIRE BOOK) Four English theologians describe how Christianity appears personally to them, not as neutral observers, but as committed believers.

It's flavor isn't as neutral or all - purpose as regular butter.

And while its sound isn't as neutral or impactful as our pick's, the results are far better than you might expect, with good detail, solid bass, and midrange that doesn't sound nasal or quacky.

Not exact matches

Equities as an asset class are not hugely in favour right now, with Goldman Sachs downgrading them to Neutral in May and advising investors to overweight cash in their portfolios.

Neutral recruiters, who didn't know who performed which pose, consistently picked only those that previously performed the powerful poses as people they would want to hire.

As a neutral observer with no stake in this issue either way, I can't say I particularly care whether Google or Apple is the more influential and important company of the past decade.

Ammann told Bloomberg Businessweek the company decided not to stay neutral as Uber and Lyft duke it out due to the «level of integration and cooperation that will be required, particularly for the longer term nature of this.»

Because of this, it's important for the royal family to remain neutral on political parties as to not cause any conflict.

But YouTube, which like Facebook and Twitter would rather be seen as neutral «platforms» rather than publishers, doesn't take the same kind of responsibility for its content that a television broadcaster is required to.

For example, if the government decides that climate change doesn't exist, «then we as entrepreneurs just got to get in there and and fill the gap and and create hundreds of thousands of jobs and make sure that» we're living in a carbon - neutral world by 2050.

Mizuho Securities's Abhey Lamba Sunday issued a note to clients cutting his rating on Apple (AAPL) shares to Neutral from Buy, and cut his price target to $ 150 from $ 160, after deciding the stock's run - up this year has «fully captured» the enthusiasm about the next iPhone, especially as pricing above $ 1,000 may not help stimulate new user demand.

NPD Sports Industry Analyst Matt Powell points to the footwear category as offering some options for everyone: «Though they're not marketed as «asexual», there are shoes that were once strictly men's shoes that have become gender neutral.»

At the time of writing, we have a Neutral rating on DuPont, which means we don't see it as a stock to buy, but we also don't consider it to be particularly unattractive.

While there are some signs of recognition such as the Fed's reduction in its estimated neutral rate from 4.5 percent to 3.0 percent during the last 2 years, the IMF's explicit use of the term secular stagnation in its World Economic Outlook, ECB president Mario Draghi's call for global coordination and greater use of fiscal policy, and Japan's indicated interest in fiscal - monetary cooperation, policymakers still have not made sufficiently radical adjustments in their world view to reflect this new reality of a world where generating adequate nominal GDP growth is likely to be the primary macroeconomic policy challenge for the next decade.

We're talking about a debt - financed tax cut and we're not talking about a revenue - neutral infrastructure plan, just as we were not talking about a revenue - neutral stimulus package in 2009.

In the current context, the expectation of a temporary period of lower growth and inflation may well point to a case for monetary policy to be on the expansionary side of neutral, as it already is, but it is not of itself a case for moving to a more expansionary stance than is currently in place.

The presence of Merrill Lynch in the mix is neutral factor for the organization from a risk perspective, but BAC as a whole does not compare that well to its large bank peers looking at the Y - 9 performance report published by federal regulators.

These included orphans from «grandparent» or earlier blocks are frequently referred to as «uncle» blocks because the gender neutral term «ommer» isn't widely known or understood.

The reality of a hormonally driven maternal instinct, distinction in the behavior of girls and hoys at a very young age in spite of gender - neutral social engineering, and the revelation that you can't «have it all» have come as a deep shock to all of us.

I don't have any problem with religions (note the plural) being offered together as a Philosophy class elective — But, it would have to cover ALL religions equally from a neutral viewpoint with contexts and relevant histories to educate children on the many religious philosophies of the world.

And since some 40 % of scripture regarding alcohol has a positive view on drinking it, then i don't see a problem here (as opposed to the 10 % that is against drinking and the 50 % that is neutral).

We see municipal and school authorities, for example, scrambling to mediate conflicts about gender - neutral bathrooms and shared locker rooms, fearful of being labeled as bigots, or sued, if they do not comply.

I hope they stay actually neutral because if we didn't have religion in our politics we would be way better off as a nation.

But you, like most liberals, turn neutral or even good actions into evil in order to continue your campaign to tar America as the modern Roman Empire, which we clearly are not.

If it weren't full of factually incorrect claims, I would be neutral on it as a historical reference.

People in other countries can be neutral if they are not involved, but the moment your country is involved, YOU, as a citizen, can no longer maintain a neutral position.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

A «neutral» law, the Supreme Court has explained, is one that does not «target -LSB--RSB- religious beliefs as such» or have as its «object... to infringe upon or restrict practices because of their religious motivation» (Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v City of Hialeah, 508 US 520 [1993]-RRB-.

In Smith, the Court interpreted its First Amendment decisions as holding «that the right of free exercise does not relieve an individual of the obligation to comply with a «valid and neutral law of general applicability on the ground that the law proscribes (or prescribes) conduct that his religion prescribes (or proscribes)»» (id.

Here, cogito and credo are antithetical acts: modern or «objective» knowledge is not religiously neutral, as so many theologians have imagined; rather, it is grounded in a dialectical negation of faith.

In other words, economics as a human activity is not ethically neutral and must be structured and governed in an ethical manner; that is, in accordance with the highest ends of man.»

But whether I use the term «psychicalism,» favored by the process philosophers, or such terms as Russell's «neutral stuff» or Feigl's distinction between the physical as the «reference» and the psychical as the «sense,» I am merely positing a name, not arguing philosophically for a conceptual scheme designed to overcome the body / mind dualism.

Some argue that a secular curriculum is religiously neutral so long as it doesn't overtly attack religion.

As such, the principle is distinguished from all substantive prescriptions, adherence to any one of which is not explicitly neutral to all moral disagreement.

I am not a fan of Piers Morgan, either, but I think in general the core CNN programming is, as it has always been, fairly neutral.

In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).

Ogden, for example, tells us that «God is not neutral or indifferent to creaturely conflict but always sides with what makes for the good of his creatures as against all that makes for evil» (FF 94).

It [Perfection] can not depend upon anything else [in particular] for its own existence — not that it could exist solitary, but its existence is entirely neutral as between alternatives of particular existence other than its own.

This would not be a particularly difficult proposition if God were only regarded as one reality among others, as one of many objects of the freedom of choice as a neutral faculty.

Black theology can not accept a view of God which does not represent him as being for blacks and thus against whites... black [204] people have no time for a neutral God... There is no use for a God who loves whites the same as blacks... What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors, here and now, by any means at their disposal.

However, since the purpose of this essay is not simply to counter Griffin's challenge but also to clarify where FWTs stand on significant epistemological issues, it is important to emphasize that most FWTs do not view «illuminating power» as a criterion that can be used in an objective, neutral fashion in any context.

@Awkward Situations: I don't think there really is such a thing as «trust neutral».

Whitehead at one place seems to reject the term «stuff» as descriptive of the ultimate reality embodied in all actual entities, saying (with reference to the «neutral stuff» of certain realistic philosophers): «An actual entity is a process, and is not describable in terms of the morphology of a «stuff»» (PR 41).

Since Catholics believe in tradition as a channel of revelation, they do not expect everything to be demonstrable from biblical evidence alone, nor by means of neutral historical research.

Scientific method, though, can not reconcile itself to teleological perspectives and, therefore, must reject any such facile covenants of man with a world that is alien to his longings for ultimate meaning.2 Monod's position is reminiscent of innumerable others that see the reading of purpose into nature as analogous to our subjectively superimposing colorful secondary qualities onto starkly colorless «objective» and neutral primary qualities.

As a position with definite views about human beings, secularism is not a value - neutral space in that project.

In other words, while I believe that those terms may be apt, I do not believe, as Dr. Henry apparently does, that they are as theory - free, as neutral as he seems to think they are.