Sentences with phrase «not at current levels»

It is only a learned cultural behavior, not for the vast majority of people a biological need — certainly not at current levels of meat consumption.

While GIS and HRL are both on my short list for June I wouldn't mind adding to my VFC as well but not at current levels.

Like CAT and EMR as potential buys too, but not at current levels.

Not exact matches

This emotional data could not only personalize your Facebook feed at a whole new level, but could also link to live in - store cameras, matching and identifying shoppers, calling up information gleaned from Facebook and identifying the shopper's current moods.

If Humana does not continue to earn and retain purchase discounts and volume rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers at current levels, Humana's gross margins may decline.

«While rising long - term rates will ultimately become a negative for profits and multiples, we do not see current levels as a reason to de-risk and sell equities,» Dubravko Lakos - Bujas, head of U.S. equity strategy at J.P. Morgan, said in a note Wednesday.

But Lynn Turner, former chief accountant at the SEC, told me «Given the level of regulatory capture and close ties to the securities industry at the current SEC, it is quite possible, if not likely, the SEC will allow the Carlyle IPO to move forward, to disastrous effect.»

MS: Part of my job is looking at how we get to the next level, and you're always looking at options, whether it's raising money or going public — both of which are not exactly easy things in the current market.

Link believes the negative headlines following the Cambridge Analytica data scandal won't have a meaningful impact on the company's top line, and she thinks the company's recent multiple compression makes it an attractive buy at current levels.

These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

«If we follow that pattern from 2015, Sebastian wouldn't be surprised if the S&P 500 can climb from its current level of 2,604 back to 2,800, at a minimum.»

However, at nearly 63 times current earnings - a whopping p / e ratio, to be sure - even if the firm were to grow its profit to the level of Berkshire - $ 8.5 billion - it would still lack the liquid assets and marketable securities the house that Warren Buffett built has, and it would not have a diversified income stream, making it far more vulnerable to changes in the competitive landscape; a major concern when you contemplate that Google operates in an industry where dramatic shifts consumer behavior can happen overnight.

The budget baseline would be altered to assume discretionary spending is constant at its current level and that trust funds are not allowed to spend in excess of their resources.

Even recent Fed cuts don't rule it out, because historically, sequential easings of monetary policy have occurred at an average S&P 500 P / E of about 11, not the current level of 27.

At that price, not only are plans to double output from the oil sands no longer commercially viable, but current production levels also come into question.

We don't expect the coin to re-test its lows, as several strong support levels are below the current price level, at $ 51, $ 44, and $ 38.

Rather than looking at actionable swing trading stock and ETF trade setups in a market that has not exactly been conducive to new swing trade entries lately (whipsaw city), today we will instead assess the current technical support and resistance levels of several broad - based ETFs that track the main stock market indexes.

3) The Hussman Strategic Growth Fund has gradually shifted from smaller to larger capitalization holdings in recent years, not out of any necessity due to Fund size (at the Fund's current asset level, we could easily populate the Fund with mid-caps if it was optimal to do so), but precisely because large stocks generally carry the best relative valuations.

Heins and his fellow top - level RIM executives — at least those who haven't joined the increasing ranks of senior executives who have left the company — are adamant that RIM can survive its current slump.

S&P 500 financials stand at a 15.5 x trailing ratio; thus, brokerage shares are not a bargain at current price levels.

Dash is still trading below the short - term support / resistance level near $ 190, in a similar pattern as Litecoin, with the all - time high at $ 220 not far away from the current levels.

Any investor can do the same, and according to some very bright minds, buying into gold at current levels isn't a bad idea.

Futures markets are not expecting the ECB to raise interest rates from their current level of 2 per cent until at least the end of 2005, while a tightening is not expected in Japan until at least 2006.

At the current levels, the reward to risk ratio just isn't in line to consider taking on new positions.

Not evident in such calculations is the extent to which the practice of high grading (mining of the highest - grade ore) has further gutted the sustainability of industry production at current levels.

We are not so optimistic as to predict that our financial holdings will return to their pre-2008 profitability levels, but at current share prices we believe that the sector is still attractive.

This isn't to say that stocks can't deliver adequate returns between now and some narrow set of future dates, but to expect that stocks purchased at these levels will deliver attractive long - term returns in general requires the assumption that current valuations will remain elevated into the indefinite future.

«Earnings and revenues are going to take the next level of the market to new highs,» says Rosenberg, who adds that the market isn't overvalued at current levels.

For instance, we can not compare current levels versus the amount of gold and silver held during the peak of the bull run nor during the trough reached at the end 2015.

Pierre Lassonde, chairman of Franco - Nevada, argues that gold is priced fairly at current levels, but it won't truly enter a bull market again until prices climb much higher and, in hindsight, make now the time to buy gold before prices get another boost; and

With oil prices plummeting 4 percent at 12:33 pm EDT on Thursday, with WTI breaking below $ 50, it looks like a nine - month extension at current production levels is not enough to convince the market.

Investors with a medium to long - term time horizon should not hesitate to purchase shares at current levels.

However, even though our market timing system is still in «sell» mode, as it has been since October 12, we are now in a situation where the reward to risk ratio for entering new short positions at current levels is simply not positive.

At current price levels we are just talking about lunacy here, not a means by which to get your money out of the country.

Similarly, we don't presently observe a year - over-year decline in industrial production, but note that the current rate of growth is already below the level that prevailed at the beginning of prior U.S. economic recessions.

This means that blindly selling short $ QQQ (or buying an inversely correlated «short ETF») at the current price level of $ QQQ is risky and not advisable.

At its current level of profitability, Mattel is not worth buying at any pricAt its current level of profitability, Mattel is not worth buying at any pricat any price.

Given assumed actuarial return assumptions of the moment, that could be true, but certainly not at current nominal Treasury yield levels that don't even come close to these assumed return levels.

We would not be surprised if the market were to spend several more days consolidating at the current level before attempting another move higher.

First, «Abenomics is working well... thus leading us to believe the foreign currency rate won't fluctuate widely from the current levels at least for next several years,» Mr. Tanaka said.

It ought to come as a surprise to no one, therefore, that from the time of the first splitting of the atom down through the destruction of Hiroshima and on to current controversies about nuclear weapons and power plants, Christian people have been involved individually and corporately at every level of the debate, not incidentally but specifically because of their Christian commitment.

In light of this fourfold division, it appears that the current disputes about Darwin and design are at bottom not so much conflicts between science and religion as disagreements about whether there is room for only one level — not a plurality of levels — on which to understand the story of life.

As I write, the Coalition for Marriage petition against gay marriage has reached a total of 600,783 signatures and by the time this is in print, that total will be considerably higher - you can check its current level at http://c4m.org.uk/, and sign the petition while you are about it if you haven't already done so.

These forms of consciousness will of course be different for every person, based on personal experience... so that is where a personal God comes in... one that fits each person's current level of understanding... a living, hopefully growing perception as knowledge increases, instead of a fixed idol or icon... but if it provides a person a non-harmful useful comfort and positive function, then what genius has the right to deprive them of that, with ridicule that their understanding is different and better, when the person being ridiculed at the time, does not possess the knowledge required to have the same understanding of the person ridiculing.

Now, there's no exact science to figuring out which areas of the world God hates the most — though you're not quite at Toledo's level yet — however, I do think that Tuesday's earthquake suggests that God's current hatred for you — as in, the Northeast corridor between Richmond and Boston — is slightly greater than his hatred for say, whatever current spot of ground Vladimir Putin is standing on.

«Current projections imply that EU milk deliveries would not be able to keep up with the annual increase in quotas over the phasing out period, leading to a steady decline in quota utilisation at aggregate EU level,» said the report.

Fonterra warns that current prices on the global market are not sustainable for suppliers at their current level.

I merely say Monreal is IMO one to use in a current back three, since Merts is too slow, though has great positional sense, and Holding is very raw and I simply don't rate Chambers at our level at all.

At that point we watch the roster / asset shuffle start all over again, as I don't see them keeping many (if any) of the current «core» players.This is complicated by the fact that the talent level of those core players isn't high enough to make them valuable assets that can be used to make notable improvements in the near - term.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off