In cases where the court does
not award joint custody, sole custody with generous visitation is an alternative that allows both parents to be involved.
In Arizona, judges generally will
not award joint custody when one parent has a DUI on his record.
Not exact matches
Remember, too, that the court can
award joint custody even if that's
not what you're asking for at this time.
For example, if either parent has been convicted of domestic violence, the court will usually presume that he or she should
not be
awarded joint custody.
If there is no agreement or if the agreement is
not in the best interests of the child, the court shall
award joint custody, unless
custody by one parent is shown by clear and convincing evidence to serve the child's best interests.
Section 63-15-230 allows the court to
award either
joint or sole
custody as it sees fit but does
not express a preference between either.
A Michigan judge says he was
not aware he had
awarded joint legal
custody of a boy to a father accused of raping the boy's mother when she was...
Thus the family court did
not err when
awarding sole
custody of the children to the mother and specifically declining to
award joint custody.
Alaska law also creates a «rebuttable presumption» (a legal assumption that has to be overcome with credible evidence to the contrary) that if an abusive parent has a history of committing domestic violence against the other parent, a child, or even a domestic living partner, the abusive parent must
not be
awarded sole legal
custody, sole physical
custody,
joint legal
custody, or
joint physical
custody.
However, the Court of Appeals affirmed the family court's decision
not to
award Husband
joint custody.
In 2012 our legislature enacted S.C. Code § 63-15-230 (C), which reads, «If
custody is contested or if either parent seeks an
award of
joint custody, the court shall consider all
custody options, including, but
not limited to,
joint custody, and, in its final order, the court shall state its determination as to
custody and shall state its reasoning for that decision.»
Joint residential
custody may be
awarded when parents request it, but Kentucky takes the general position that it's
not in a child's best interests to bounce back and forth between parents» homes on a consistent, regular basis.
If the other parent doesn't agree, consider this; Courts generally don't like to
award sole
custody to one parent without substantial evidence that
joint custody is
not in the child's best interest.
More than 30 states now have statutes specifically authorizing
joint custody awards, and most states now hold that a court's authority to
award joint custody does
not depend upon the parties that request it.
Regardless of each state's position for or against a presumption or preference in favor of
joint custody and whether or
not it has been specifically authorized, overall there appears to be a growing trend in favor of
joint custody and more and more bills are being introduced to adopt a presumption that
joint custody is in the best interest of the child unless certain circumstances apply (such as convincing evidence that a parent is unfit or that it would
not be in the best interest of the child to
award joint custody).
Unless a parent can prove it is
not in the best interest of the child, the court usually will
award joint physical
custody to the parents.
More than 30 states now have statutes specifically authorizing
joint custody awards, and most states now hold that the courts authority to
award joint custody does
not depend upon whether the parties request it.
If the court order does
not outline any type of shared physical or
joint legal
custody, the court may
not intend to
award any form of
custody to the other parent.
Joint custody is deemed favorable, however, this may
not always be
awarded if parents can
not get along and the child is at risk with one of them.
Joint custody may be
not always be
awarded in cases where the child's well - being is at risk with one of the parents.
Joint physical
custody awards both parents a substantial amount of time in which the child resides with them, under their supervision; however, this time will
not necessarily be exactly equal.
Regardless of whether the law in your state authorizes
joint custody of a pet or
not, fighting to become the sole owner of your pet will require you to persuade the judge that s / he should
award the pet to you.
A California court does
not start with the presumption that it must
award joint custody to both parents.
Generally, when one parent is
awarded sole or primary physical
custody, it is
not uncommon for the court to order
joint legal
custody to both parents.
«After hearing all of the evidence, the trial court found that the
joint -
custody arrangement was
not working and that primary
custody should be
awarded to one of the parties.
If a Connecticut family court does
not order
joint custody, it may order alternative
custody arrangements, such as
awarding sole physical
custody to one parent with appropriate visitation for the child with the non-custodial parent.
For example, if either parent has been convicted of domestic violence, the court will usually presume that he or she should
not be
awarded joint custody.
North Carolina statutes do
not define
joint custody and rarely
award joint custody to both parents of minor children.
Code 3083, 3084, 3085 (West 1994)(stating that a grant of
joint legal
custody does
not necessitate an
award of
joint physical
custody); Colo..
Joint 50/50
Custody should be awarded to both parents by default at the time of birth and a parent should not have to go about knocking on the courts to award c
Custody should be
awarded to both parents by default at the time of birth and a parent should
not have to go about knocking on the courts to
award custodycustody.
«If we are serious about the best interest of the child being the principle that comes first, if that's the primary consideration in
awarding custody, then we ought
not to have a rebuttable presumption in favor of
joint custody.
[FN67] While such eventualities would
not necessarily preclude a
joint custody award, they do underscore the difficulty of imposing interaction implicit in the marital relationship upon parties who are
not in that relationship.
If the marriage ends in divorce, the legal father —
not the biological father — could be granted physical or legal
custody of the child,
awarded joint custody, or ordered to pay child support, to name a few potential outcomes.