Sentences with phrase «not be correct»

You may think that it is impossible to get term life insurance if you're a cancer survivor, but that assumption may not be correct.

The data showing here may not be correct at the time you use their premium calculator and determine the exact premium amount for 1 crore sum assured value.

A few seconds» thought suggests that this can not be correct, and I suspect it needs multiplying by 1,000.

However, the judges refuted that argument endorsing statements by the claimants» QC that it can not be correct that, even in contentious liquidations, everything is done in contemplation of litigation.

Such an interpretation can not be correct.

A situation when the presumption that it is the rear - driver's fault would not be correct is in a situation where you jam on your brakes for no reason at all and someone rear - ends you; it may not be their fault if you braked without reason.

By this point, if you are not an employment lawyer, you are probably thinking something to the effect of, «This can not be correct.

That can not be correct in light of the Law Society guidance; but, also, practically, in a city such as York, which is rife with properties subject to CRL.

What the government defines as «public use,» «necessary,» and «just compensation» may not be correct.

Or they're sitting next to some other nervous person who's telling them information that may or may not be correct, so we focus part of the game on that.

More recently, though, the Board has stated that there must be more than procedural content; that there is an active obligation on employers to enable workers to make complaints and it can not be correct that there is no worker remedy if an employer terminates a worker for doing so.

I don't know much about the law so terms may not be correct.

GCMs do incorporate this, although their simulations of feedbacks and their effects may not be correct.

More substantive potential criticisms based on peer - reviewed literature (which may or may not be correct) have to be considered more carefully in the context of similar studies and relevance, and that is generally what happens.

So my point is that we don't know why the ice is expanding — we have one new theory, which may or may not be correct.

It may not be correct, but I tend to prefer his top - down methodology of finding and accounting for the strongest influences first in building a workable hypothesis.

They can not both be correct.

Fred, would it not be correct to also quote the criticism from 1990?

Since they now agree that their presented ACE - FTS data for the winter Antarctica can not be correct, it is surprizing to read their statement that «We note, however, that all conclusions of the paper remain unchanged».

I am sure they are perfectly capable of getting the evidence that will demonstrate that the Co2 hypothesis, as currently formulated, can not be correct.

So, on the science, it appears that in the first place, the premise that the oceans have not been heating may not be correct, and the science certainly isn't settled.

if the errors are randomly distributed then the adjustment can not be correct if they show a trend.

The suggestion of two shells, one being the troposphere and the other the stratosphere can not be correct because the outermost shell has to be cooler than the next inner shell and in this case the tropopause is colder than the stratosphere.

Because the input is totally independent of the empirical work (it would not be a correct prior without being totally independent), it's not conceivable that the authors of the empirical analysis would somehow limit the choices that others make.

However, several recent studies have suggested that these assumptions may not be correct.

It may or may not be correct, but it is falsifiable I think.

Both can not be correct.

That result can not be correct.

Although your math seems to work, it appears to me that your conclusion may not be correct, at least if Velasco et al. are; if I interpret their paper correctly, the kinetic - energy profile of their Equation 8 is the maximum - entropy configuration, from which I would conclude that a strictly isothermal microcanonical ensemble will spontaneously undergo (an incredibly small) heat transfer to assume that (ever so slightly non-isothermal) configuration.

This can not be correct because it is well known that CO2 radiative forcing increases logarithmically with concentration — not linearly.

True, I did make an assumption which may not be correct.

He may or may not be correct in his theory or inquiry.

It would still pick up heat from direct conduction, as Gary Moran has insisted; and it would not be correct to say that there would be NO interaction with radiation (another point by Tom Vonk): if there are lower - energy bands, they will be used by the gas to absorb photons.

All they can do is process the data fed into them (much of which, it is generally agreed, is of pretty poor quality) using models based on theories which may or may not be correct.

They may get the physics wrong, they may use the wrong parameter estimates, they may or may not work, their use of ensemble averages to predict most probable trajectories may not be correct, but that doesn't mean that they are not science or that they qualify as religion.

I understand why we're talking past each other, but until you accept that there are assumptions built into your science religion that simply aren't correct, or even might not be correct, you won't understand.

Spencer points out that suspiciously high radiosonde humidity data during the 1950's and 1960's might not be correct and if not then there's no drying effect in the atmosphere subsequently.

This may not be correct.

As far as Otto & Lewis, it wasn't so much the papers (which may well have done it properly - I should probably just try and read them) but the new post written by Nic Lewis which seems to use quantities that may not be correct.

Be sure to pick a location near you, or enter your latitude / longitude — otherwise, sun motions and shadows will not be correct.

In other words, the conclusion that everything else that we have will last us only 12 years would not be correct.

In this context, Gray's public assertions and Bryden et al's quantitative findings can not both be correct.

«But now that I am older it would not be correct because my problems have gone.»

My realization of the work is how I interpret the typewritten proposal; it may not be the correct, or most accurate interpretation of the described work but it is my interpretation.

First - teamer will not be a correct word.

However, we suspect that may not be correct as Microsoft still has a number of major Xbox 360 first and third party games that are due to be released before June, including Gears of War Judgement in March.

However, that one piece of news may not be correct but we do think Ghosts 2 could be the one to release this year.

This is just a listing from Amazon, so it may not be correct.

Go to put it on and says it may not be correct or no longer valid... wth

calling this upscaled or 1080i would not be correct.