Sentences with phrase «not be our main striker»

Giroud should not be our main striker.

When will Wenger learn that: 1) Giroud CA N'T be our main striker 2) we need to play with a proper left winger 3) we need PACE?!?!?!?!?!?!

Giroud shouldn't be our main striker but in some game he can start because of the patern which that club played.

That is all but tells u Giroud will not be our main striker this year, Arsene wl either buy a new striker or wl wait for Walcolt.

Giroud should not be our main striker next season.

Not exact matches

Main strikers mostly aren't the goal scorers nowadays.

I know we're short in central midfield, but Arsenal would actually be better off playing with a man less, than having Ramsey on the pitch, and Giroud proved over a whopping FOUR YEARS, that he isn't good to be our main striker.

(Yes I know we have Sanchez, but as last year proved he is not a striker, and shouldn't really be expected to be the main goal scorer especially when he is not leading the line)

poor signings and allowing unnecessary sellings of players not based on team needs When Cr7 is not scoring and marcelo and casemiro become strikers over their main roles in the team... Players play what coaches tell them especially positioning and movements... Hard days are ahead with PSG looming..

With his doubles against Sunderland and Burnley, the 25 - year old has bagged eight goals in those six games and for a player that does not even play as the main central striker, it just shows you how good Alexis is and the fantastic form he has found since swapping La Liga for the English Premier League.

As long as Giroud is our main striker we will not win any major trophy.

But that's not an excuse to rely on Giroud as our main CF.. He's proven ever season that he's only good as a back up striker and not one that can carry the team to win the title.

My main question is why Wenger sold Podolski if he couldn't find a striker?

Giroud's main role as the central striker, believe it or not, is to occupy the defenders and give our fluid and ever changing formation a focal point.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

End of Transfer window: We could not find a stiker in this transfer window, so we have been working hard with Theo and Sanogo who will play as the main striker this season.

Giroud is good striker but he should be our # 2 and not main.

Chamahk too and that's why they did not succeed as the main strikers at Arsenal.

But don't be pessimistic about Welbeck as our main striker.

And not only that he does that, but he uses Welbeck, a guy who fails to score a goal even if it's just him and the goal, as the main striker, even though he has Giroud on the bench, a guy who scored a goal in the first game.

He admitted that he was desperate to buy another top defender in January (although I don't think we tried hard enough personally) to try and stop so many silly errors by our back line, but he has made it his main priority to bring in more strikers to add to our «goals for» column.

Watch a program (about transfers - Same program where I learned about Ozil transfer) on Canal + and they are again talking about «secret» negotiations (well they are not anymore, I guess) that might have started just after Benitez nomination... Apparently Benitez would prefer Ronaldo as a main striker (and a most defensive system).

Add that to the fact's that he is only looking for a striker because of Danny Setbeck's longterm injury and that Giroud will be our main striker next season, So the answer to this equation is» Don't expect much» (Start looking for a fourth and fifth choice?)

Sorry he was not trusted as your main striker.

It is not his fault that he was our main striker for two years.

Don't have a main striker — should be buying one — if we don't, Giroud will continue to waste a lot of the good work done by our very talented midfield.

He will be our main man despite the fact that he doesn't even feature in the top 10 best strikers in the PL IMO.

I was saying if we get another goal scoring winger like Sanchez it won't matter if our main striker (giroud) gets 20 goals.

Would it not be a good idea to have him play as our main striker, whereby he can be useful in converting more of our chances on a regular basis?

now add ManU, I don't even know if Martial or Rooney is their main striker... Liverpool??? We are close to City in that we can still at least spread the goals If there is really a top top striker available, u'd expect Man U / Man city to swoop him

I cant imagine he will leave for the same type of money that they bought him for as with ffp rules and his scoring these days being very good for a winger but not so much for main striker and also people will be looking at Falcaos case.

I too have much regard for Giroud but we are never going to win the title with his standard as main striker, despite his relative success and at 31 he can not be expected to play third fiddle behind the LACAZETTE and P - MA.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

I think Wenger will keep him, and I wouldn't be surprised if Giroud was our main striker yet again for next season, considering how Wenger usually performs in the transfer windows, coupled with his unwavering loyalty to certain players.

Wenger's 1st choice striker is out for most of the season (this is probably the main reason, had OG been fit we wouldn't have signed him people).

No matter what you think of the Frenchman, and it is clear that many Gooners and pundits believe we can never win the title with Oli as our main striker, you can not deny that he has a great habit of popping up with a goal when we most need it.

AKBs will attack by saying OG is the main striker for the France national team; but our style of play is not like France so when we need prolific strikers, don't compare based on who plays and who doesn't for France..

Players that are always OK with the FA cup and 4th trophy are signing new contracts everyday, those that wants to win major trophies see that those silverware can not be won with such players, OG as main striker..

But chill out, Arsene won't buy him or any other striker just like last season as he is going to count on Giroud and Sanogo as our main strikers and guess what!

I like Giroud, his stats are good and comparable to vardy and kane but there is something missing, perhaps it is making a goal out of nothing, but I can not se us winning the league with giroud as our main striker.

Me too, haha the guy won't make it, if Wenger thinks we can win he league with him upfront as our main striker with Giroud injured then he's got dimensure.

Also his scoring rate is not very prolific for the main striker of a team the stature of Arsenal.

Theo and Oli are both not good enough to be our main strikers.

I don't see anyone fitting this criteria especially when you consider that striker knows the main reason they are being purchased is to cover largely for Danny welbeck.

Fact is, Giroud + Sanogo will not score more goals than Aguero + Dzeko and Costa + Drogba hence if Giroud and Sanogo are gonna be Arsenal's main strikers, Arsenal has a very small probabilty to win the title.

He may be good as a backup but not as our main striker.

England's strikers are Rooney, Sturridge and Kane and right now they have a better goal scoring record than Walcott and they are actually strikers that is their main position.So don't expect England to play Walcott as striker.

But didn't he play quite well in the fall when he was the main striker?

With him being the main striker, but being saved the whole hustle and bustle of big CBs only to make the right run and sneak in with a goal when neccesary, only that he doesn't offer the defensive cover Ramsey would and wouldn't stretch the opposition anywhere near as much as the Ox would if you need him to keep a fullback busy.

In my opinion, I think Walcott and even Sanchez are strikers but not main CFs... To get the best of Walcott, he should be played in a two striker formation.