Sentences with phrase «not beautiful men»

Before you get all «gold - digger» on me (because I'm pretty sure you thought of beautiful women marrying wealthy men as a way to have a lifestyle they want and not beautiful men marrying wealthy women, but OK), let's explore what's been in the news recently.

I'm not saying Touchdown Tom isn't a beautiful man, but there's no denying the Silicon Valley - designed algorithms of Google believe he's at least 44 percent misshapen monster who lives under a bridge.

Not exact matches

A steadily increasing number of people will want to get in on the «new Bitcoin,» a bizarre paradox given that gold is as old as time, and will soon realize that gold possesses virtues Bitcoin does not, given that it is real, not digital and abstract; that owners can personally possess and store it in physical form; that it will survive any kind of electric grid or Internet disruption that might occur; that it can not ever be hacked; that it is the epitome of private, quiet wealth; that it is actually quite beautiful to behold; and that it was not and can not be made by man, only by God, who does not appear to have any interest in making any more of it.

Can't find it discribed as a beautiful thing between man and man, woman and woman.

Because the Bible tells us not, «Man, you have to get all the jots and tittles right before you go out and tell people about Jesus,» but «How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!»

Sorry, I think she CAN be beautiful inside and out, but doesn't want any man's attention and this is how she is handling it.

It's all about self control and respecting the dignity of the other person during the most beautiful act a man and woman can engage in, not turning it into the most popular contact sport of our generation.

There's a beautiful world of hurting crazy out there and our brave kids are in the centre of it, and our people are the bloodied wounded because of it, and our dreams and our hopes and our futures and our communities and our countries are hanging in the balance through it, and there is a war in the heavenlies and the man laying beside me is believing that if our lives aren't up in the air where the battle is, our lives on the ground fail.

Rightly understood, man cleaves to his wife not because she is «flesh of his flesh,» nor because she is beautiful or because she loves him back, but because she is his chosen, willing, and coequal lifelong partner in self - conscious devotion to the work of perpetuation.

Thus many women who seek counseling find little help in escaping the trap between a submissive existence in which they are of secondary importance if not actively obedient to men, and a pedestal - like existence in which they are exalted as beautiful and holy.

That is the beauty of the «Holy Spirit» but history would prove he was a curly haired black man, not the the beautiful.

Or if you were witness to that lovable young man's beautiful enthusiasm when he read and heard of the great men who fought with a heavy destiny and suffered badly in the world, the glorious ones whom earth renounced because it was not worthy of them, would you dare, when no clamor caused your speech to wander but when the stillness of intimacy, of the lovable one's confidence, the in experience of the young man, all obliged you to tell the truth; at such a time would you dare lay your hand on your heart and say, «Such things no longer happen.

Never forget that the devout wise man wins his most beautiful of all victories, when the powerful one who had persecuted him wishes, so to speak, to release him, and the wise man replies: «I can not unconditionally wish to be released, for I can not know for certain that the persecution might not be good for me.»

Most days I don't know which is harder for me to believe: that God reanimated the brain functions of a man three days dead, or that God can bring back to life all the beautiful things we have killed.

Margaret Mitchell writes, «Scarlett O'Hara was not beautiful, but men seldom realized it when caught by her charm as the Tarleton twins were.

And beautiful Camellia, whom all the men want for reasons that, in her child - like innocence, she does not understand.

Shalit tells us that in 1994 she rushed off to see the new movie version of Little Women, only to discover that our hidden cultural censors, fearful of anything that does not cohere with prevailing orthodoxy, had expunged one of «the best lines» in the story, when Marmee says: «To be loved by a good man is the best and sweetest thing which can happen to a woman; and I sincerely hope my girls may know this beautiful experience.»

I do not understand those that want to commune with their version of a god can not do so in a beautiful area of the world and at the same time commune with nature and cut out the middle man.

Here are buildings constructed by the faithful and the finest artists and architects throughout the centuries, more beautiful than ever but not really serving their highest purpose: the praise of God and the bestowal of grace on men.

Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948), who often spoke of Jesus, wrote «the gentle figure of Christ, so patient, so kind, so loving, so full of forgiveness that he taught his followers not to retaliate when abused or struck but to turn the other cheek — it was a beautiful example, I thought, of the perfect man.»

He has made everything beautiful in its time; also he has put eternity into man's mind, yet so that he can not find out what God has done from the beginning to the end.

Being a follower of Christ is a beautiful thing, but we must be careful that we are not caught up in the theatrics and end up following man.

Stop useing the terrible things man does to give God a black eye for not creating a bunch of robots that only sing beautiful songs 24/7.

Man and wife may go to confession in beautiful fellowship with each other, but they may not confess together.

In response to the Shulamite's probing as to where to find him, the man responds, «if you do not know, most beautiful of women...» (1:8), which the Septuagint renders «If you do not know yourself.»

It was combined with «Black Power» By Dr. Hal Cones — who wrote «If god is not involved in the holy endeavor for the destruction of the Black Man's enemy and the beautiful endeavor of black power, then that god must be destroyed.»

Not knowing how he looked he was painted in Hollywood image during that time of a beautiful, handsome, perfect man / model; an expression of the artist.

But with a room full of drunken men demanding the presence of a beautiful woman, I think we can all agree Xerxes wasn't calling her in to consult her for a trivia game.

They never leave a man behind, dead or alive, and if there's any more beautiful sentiment than that from our loving heavenly Father, I don't know it.

There is nothing wrong with a good bop, but bopping shouldn't be allowed to squeeze out proper dancing, with learnt steps, where men and women really do interact with each other, dress for the occasion and create something that is beautiful to watch.

Marriage between a man and a woman is God's original plan, and as the beautiful statement in the Nuptial Mass reminds us it is «the one blessing not destroyed by Original Sin, or washed away in the flood».

I agree with you Tim, the premise of the article leads one to believe that because LDS has a big accredited university with deep theological minds and some leader of a big Christian seminary, again a deep theological mind, head knowledge not heart knowledge, that Mormonism should be recognized as a stream of Christianity.How Mormons differ is how they relate to Christ and the Holy Spirit.Only people who have encountered Jesus and thus a changed life, can be called an evangelical.Mormnism is man made religion.The Holy Spirit always points people to Jesus, not another man - Joseph Smith.Great moral people, who do lots of good and build beautiful tabernacles, but then again the Pharisees did too.

As a non Believer, what I find amusing is the attributes people choose to equate with their God, for instance, all the good and beautiful things in life are a results of Gods «love», and all the bad and ugly things in life are a results of mans choices, not God's dislike for us.

For me, if the thought of a man naked and tortured on a cross, willing against will, because of love is not a bit scary, then we have lost something truly beautiful.

Man I hope I win this I've been wanting a mixer for a long time especially one of these I can't afford a nice one right now so I have my fingers crossed for this contest I have entered everyday for about a month maybe a little longer so I hope the odds are in my favor but I know not to have my hope up its a beautiful mixer I'm sure a whole bunch of people entered.

We could have had Cesc delivering those beautiful long balls from deep, same as he used to do for Henry and now does for Costa, to Welbeck who does much better up front as last man with space to run, not scuffing around in the box or Sanchez.

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

Nervous start — usual criticism at the beginning of the season, with the lack of spending Ramsey's first blood — Arsenal shocked the league, we played brilliant football, scoring beautiful goals, all seemed like a decent season for us Coq red card — injury crisis struck, the lack of bench depth put pressure on the team, the downfall of performance caused crucial points Alexis» goal when down to ten men - it all seemed like arsenal would lose out in the title race again but arsenal somehow surprised the league again, saying aye we got the quality but we just ai nt gonna show in week in week out Draw in NLD with 10 men — can't really complain about it but you ain't happy.

At Barca, Bayern, Man U, Chelsea and other ambitious clubs they could build the most beautiful golden stadium and training grounds with a balance sheet that contained hundreds of millions in cash, if no ambition and success was shown for 10 years those fans would not give a rats as about how beautiful the stadium was in which they sat whilst losing 5 - 1 to a big club for the umpteen time.

Saying hitting into row z is not beautiful on the eye, well neither is a grown man avoiding contact or giving up because he does not have the ball in a forward area.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

How can anyone be resistant to Market forces — you can't have someone leaving the job of their own accord — his very existence threatens the man - hood of the Market paradigm as it tightens its grip on our beautiful game!

Great and beautiful win, kudos to all d players for their energy and passion and will to win but don't forget d real issues............ Now mertesacker is a great defender even with is faint hearted block to Costa's goal, even with the way ospina conceded d goal was enough reason why cech would av been better any day anytime and still wenger chose ospina at the most important match, and because Ramsey equalised after we conceded under pressure when we were one man up, look at d replays, only Ramsey was not a pussy, d rest were scared of not conceding more by staying close to our goal, Ramsey ran forward and was d only player apart from Sanchez and ground looking for d winner.

Tippy tappy football is not even beautiful anymore — Man City are taking that to a new level.

Why so much effort and so much money spent to enter the top 4 in every single year?Just to be embarrased everytime by anyone?I mean, is not worth it if you don't take advantage of that and go for the glory.Everything is on vain, just the pleasure of showing up?This team doesn't have a future, it is just a mediocre one, get use it.Glory times are past, class players are gone... what is left?Just a name chasing the shadows of the past.And all this sorrow atmosphere has only one man responsible - Arsene Wenger.He must go for the good of the club, he is just a stone dragging the team backward or keeping it still.Just go Arsena, don't embarras yourself and the beautiful times you lived here.

The beautiful Fanny Neguesha hit town with a handsome new man last night... but don't worry Mario, it was only her cousin!

The hiring of Villas - Boas was not only a sign that Chelsea were ambitious and looking to play a beautiful style of football, but a sign that Abramovich is not necessarily the reactive and impatient man that he is often perceived as.

this is a beautiful write - up Iwobi has his issues but the guy's a budding talent Most pple here want us to offload everyone in the team The team is having issues, therefore a lot of players under perform Chelsea is having issues, even Hazard is underperforming, maybe he's useless and should be discarded going by how most Arsenal fans think Man City is playing well, does that mean Otamendi, John Stones, Delph, Gundogan and even Bernando are world Class — No they are not We know how headless Sterling can be if his team is not doing well, but presently he's Super Our team has issues that need sorting You guys just want to offload everybody When Kolasinac joined he was on a Best - Left mood, but not anymore — so we should offload him?

I» v been a fan of Arsenal for 12 years, when i became an Arsenal's fan, Arsenal didn't win the premier league even once and have seen Arsenal getting wrecked badly by teams like Man utd and Chelsea, but also in these times i have seen beautiful football from Arsenal that no other team can play and this year's squad even without Alexis is the strongest Arsenal squad i have seen since i became it's fan.

«It's just, you know, France has so many beautiful, beautiful circuits — Le Mans, for example — and for some reason we don't have it at the most beautiful track.