Sentences with phrase «not bite a human»

To teach a puppy to not bite a human is very important.

For people who are concerned about being bitten by the GM mosquitoes, he added that only males are genetically modified, and male mosquitoes do not bite humans.

Not exact matches

They're all male, so they won't bite anyone — only female mosquitoes bite humans.

You are correct, this world is better off with Religeon because God knows that the average human is not capable of standing on it's own two feet and needs a bit of a cruch in order to act even halfway civilized.

rather than seeing these as an imposed set of rules, we can see these as a benediction, empowering us to be better... a bit like visions, rules can make failures of us, where as with a benediction we are not bound, but free to become more human.

Humans have been lied to and misled about divinity, faith and God for so long, they would not know the truth if it reached up and bit them on the proverbial cheeks.Deception has been a part of the history of mankind from day one.Further changes to the Bible only indicates it is still as strong as ever.The New Testament without Christ is like a riddle without an answer.

Let me help Nathan out a bit... Christ, if you are a medical student as still think that the theory of evolution claims that the human body happened «randomly,» please leave school now and do not endanger people's lives.

We observe that evil has no boundaries — the very existence of torture, and the fact that human rights organisations believe that over 80 % of the world's governments practice some form of it, shows that humans are not just content to be a little bit evil, but are most willing to be CREATIVELY evil, concocting new ways to inflict pain and suffering onto others.

(Can't give you the details as I'm writing a memoir and don't wish to give the good bits away in case it gets published) Even though I have doubted all the other stuff along the years — promises etc that didn't come to pass, despite my diligent prayer and obedience, I still cry out to «something out there» because I am spirit in a human body, and know that I am on a journey that has to mean more than simply this earthly plain.

Wouldn't you agree that it's a bit more ego - centric to believe that an all - powerfull divine being created humans in his image, rather then acknowledging that we're all unimportant continuous chemical reactions that coalesced by pure randomness?

The fourth step goes a bit further, to see «the trajectory eventuating in the creation of human historical existence» not «as a metaphysical surd but rather as grounded in the ultimate nature of things, in the ultimate mystery.»

These are bits of the world which may be considered as units for good human purposes, but which do not possess the unitary character of a natural moment since they are composed of such moments in external relations to one another.

But if we see the Bible as both human and divine — not just divine (literalism), not just human (liberalism), and certainly not a bit of both (mix - and - match)-- then we will submit to the loving authority of God in all scripture, whether or not we find what it says easy to swallow.

It does not necessarily follow from these affirmations that all matter or all energy have in them some bits of life or protolife, or that the primordial amoeba or the primordial virus possessed some rudiments of human consciousness or some embryonic minds.

New Age spirituality isn't really my cup of tea, and ever since I visited India I've been a bit skeptical about Eastern religions, as they seem to perpetuate a cultural indifference toward human suffering.

This new and developing form of human consciousness is still far from universal, but the world that we each create in our heads1 (our mental picture of reality) is now being constructed rather differently, by absorbing innumerable bits of knowledge and information from all over the world, not just from our own small locality.

Humans are a bit of debris rolling about on a little water covered rock aren't they.

The statue is broken to bits by a stone, not cut by human hands; the eschatological kingdom of God brings to an end the succession of earthly kingdoms (Daniel 2).

@Godpot... (God — pot... I'll have to try that... seems Dad has been holding back...) and that Moses character... I'll wager there was more than just a bush burnin» up there... (wouldn't know... me and that bird were trying to figure out the physics of stuffing «God» into a human womb right about that time... I'm thinking all these characters, not just me, were a bit «touched» as my child «Reality» likes to say...: 0)

If the intellectuals in the plays of Chekhov who spent all their time guessing what would happen in twenty, thirty, or forty years had been told that in forty years interrogation by torture would be practiced in Russia; that prisoners would have their skulls squeezed within iron rings; that a human being would be lowered into an acid bath; that they would be trussed up naked to be bitten by ants and bedbugs; that a ramrod heated over a primus stove would be thrust up their anal canal («the secret brand»); that a man's genitals would be slowly crushed beneath the toe of a jackboot; and that, in the luckiest possible circumstances, prisoners would be tortured by being kept from sleeping for a week, by thirst, and by being beaten to a bloody pulp, not one of Chekhov's plays would have gotten to its end because all the heroes would have gone off to insane asylums.

But it does not hurt Christians one bit to be reminded that Jesus was also human.

let me count the ways: 1) the bible a 2000 year old book written by sheepherders put together by a roman dictator and cut and pasted by every pope in history is your authority on events that aren't recorded anywhere else in human history... without stretching things a bit.

What I do see as a bit ironic, in fact, is people who call themselves scientists ignoring the entire history of human experience so as not to have a design explanation, when every indication is that it looks designed.

Yes, this messes a bit with our understanding of the inspiration of Scripture, but in the end (at least for me) it amplifies the grace of God for it shows that He was speaking His truth to lots of people at different times, not just to a select few Jews in a few hundred years of human history.

Humans do not contribute the tiniest bit to the free gift of eternal life.

It's just using part of the human language to reveal a bit about something in a way that isn't that offensive.

Last September The War Cry noted that the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) had agreed in principle to allow the mixing of animal and human genetic material for research into incurable diseases and that the resultant 99.9 per cent human mixture would be human bits, not human beHuman Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) had agreed in principle to allow the mixing of animal and human genetic material for research into incurable diseases and that the resultant 99.9 per cent human mixture would be human bits, not human behuman genetic material for research into incurable diseases and that the resultant 99.9 per cent human mixture would be human bits, not human behuman mixture would be human bits, not human behuman bits, not human behuman beings.

Her writing is so thoughtfully done with bits of humor that let you know she is in fact a human and not some robot that's trying to use the most flowery of words to sound smart.

Modern scientific research shows that salting the eggplant is not actually removing most of the bitter compounds, but the added salt at least decreases the human tongue's perception of bitterness, very much like how adding a little bit of salt to bad coffee improves the taste.

I wasn't going to share this... because frankly I am a bit embarrassed by it... but I'm only human after all.

And as this tiny human I have created squirms and wiggles and laughs and bites my shoulder with his razor - sharp little teeth, I can't help thinking that it is me he is here to teach, and not the other way around.

Of course, in the end, in anything involving human judgment, there's a little subjectivity, but College Insider's poll and definition of who is and isn't included carries a bit more weight than blog commenters.

well i get where you come from but i wouldnt call it less passionate but more practical, i just do nt like to be butthurt ^ ^ i am fan of arsenal to enjoy the time i spend on football but if it ends in failures i try to get over its and be constructive about it, and i am not a fan of people who cant control their anger pains and have to project their frustrations onto the people who could be held responsible but not in this scale, in my opinion of the society humans should be able to control their emotions a bit and never stoop as low as to be abusive and i do think that a lot of comments on justarsenal were abusive and sorry but i do nt think of it as passionate an extreme example would be ultras you could call them muuuuch more passionate than me but in my opinion they are just scum of football, but of course i do nt want to compare the JA - commenters to ultras xD i just tried to illustrate my opinion ^ ^

Watford, westbrom, but to be honest i do nt blame losses on officials we get 90 mins to win games bit i think across the league its been poorer this year more than previous esp.linesman decisions i end up watching more than just the arsenal games but arsenal is where my heart and loyalty lies and its been week in and week across the league this year on officials i understand close offsides and fouls here and there cause football has a tremendous gray area in terms of constant action but linesman have missed multiple offsides by 5 yards and more and the consistency hasnt been there one week a call is this way next week the call is the other way but i am going to stop going on about officials as of now as you said and i agree its down human error an apart of the game

A good debate can provoke an individual to exercise his mind a bit more, if I can raise that in people by offending them so I do not care if I offend them, better to be offended briefly and evolve as a human being than staying stubborn and ignorant, constantly upset at things which make no sense.

Well, I care a bit because I am human and don't pray for injuries to people but the Arsenal side of me just want our players to be fit after the Intl break.

What the now 24 - year old has experienced in the last few weeks is an occupational evolution - paraphrasing Mourinho's words - and for humans that may not have had a Pokemon experience in their lives, that may sound a bit weird.

I must say I have ended my, not so impressive, football career after a leg breaking tackle and I know a bit of how a human being reacts to playing football after such a thing.

I'm not human until at least 10 so some mornings it takes quite a bit of tea to get me going.

It's great that scientists are working out the mechanics of this, but isn't it a bit depressing that it's «newsworthy» to discover that humans are designed in such a way that two people who produce a child, are predisposed towards looking after it — thus ensuring the continuation of the species?

While you are likely correct that humans don't always eat offal, we do eat the low quality bits of meat leftover after the slaughtering process in the product commonly known as «pink slime.»

The breast is part of that sexiness and it's important to realize that the idea of the breast being sexy, is actually not the biological norm for humans, which to us, from the West, sounds a bit mad, because we just assume that breasts are inherently sexy and inherently part of our sex lives, but actually, that's not the reality for a lot of cultures out there.

The point she was trying to make is that she's real / human / not calculating, but the «career politicians» line seems a bit risky.

«David Cameron and George Osborne, meanwhile, say don't worry: immigration can be slashed, human rights redrawn, taxes lowered, the NHS protected, and we can have all the benefits of being in Europe while opting out of the bits we don't like.

As a (poor) analogy, arguing whether or not it's human - caused feels a bit like planning to develop real estate on a seaside clifftop which some specialists have said might suffer dangerous erosion in the next 70 years unless you put up some seawalls to prevent water action at the base of the cliff - and basing your view whether to build seawalls and other erosion defences upon whether or not there's proof that human activity would be the cause of any future erosion, rather than whether or not erosion is likely and if so how harmful it might be to your interests if nothing is done to reduce it.

Allowing intercept evidence is not the answer - government reviews have shown time and time again that it would not make a bit of difference to current control order cases - and we have already shown that we are going to remain in thrall to the European Court of Human Rights.

«Although the venom is diluted in the much larger blood volume of a human and do not cause stroke, bite victims can still die from internal bleeding.»

As Finley Austin, Ph.D. in Human Genetics and now administrative director for the Merck Genome Research Institute, admits: «I find it a bit difficult as to how to advise someone to follow my path, since it was not what I originally set out to do.»

Blacklegged nymphs rarely bite humans down South, though researchers don't agree as to why not.

Infected mosquitoes attempted to bite human volunteers more frequently but could not draw any blood.