End Religion writer, Justice has not been done because he did
not break any of their laws other than to be a different Religion than Iran.
Not exact matches
Before you
break into a sweat over the small business requirements in the health - care legislation signed into
law last month, take a deep breath: Many
of its provisions will take months if
not years to go into effect.
And Schroeder agreed he has «no knowledge»
of any accounting concerns,
broken laws or breach
of standards «that has
not been resolved.»
The Caravan is largely
broken up thanks to the strong immigration
laws of Mexico and their willingness to use them so as
not to cause a giant scene at our Border.
They were accused
of breaking a 2006 Internet gambling
law that prohibits companies from accepting payments for online bets where they are
not legal.
Hasen's point appeared to be borne out Saturday when Stone submitted an affidavit to the Nevada court pledging to post a list
of cautionary commands on the «Stop the Steal» web site in an effort to ensure that its volunteers do
not break the
law.
Of course, there's only so much it can do to guarantee that its subcontractors won't break the law, on the other side of the plane
Of course, there's only so much it can do to guarantee that its subcontractors won't
break the
law, on the other side
of the plane
of the planet.
But then again, there's notoriously little any company can do to guarantee that its subcontractors won't
break the
law, whether it operates on the other side
of the planet or just down the street.
Those who thought this
breaks the
laws of physics didn't have understanding
of how the [uBeam] system worked, or what the basic specs are.»
The answer is no, the technology does
not break the
laws of physics... if it
broke the
laws of physics, that's something you can find out pretty early with basic principles and math.
The only difference in the way
law's practiced today versus the way it was practiced in 1880 is fountain pen to ink pen to computer to tablet, but it's the exact same
broken business model that doesn't work for the majority
of Americans.
«While
not every case will be appropriate for admissions
of wrongdoing, the SEC required JPMorgan to admit the facts in the SEC's order — and acknowledge that it
broke the
law — because JPMorgan's egregious breakdowns in controls and governance put its millions
of shareholders at risk and resulted in inaccurate public filings.»
It's
not — from the people who serve in this Parliament, it's
not enough to simply follow the rules or follow the ethics code or even follow the
law because we have a government right now that has
broken repeatedly all three
of those.
Gascon has sent letters to Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar, in which he accused them
of breaking state
law and he threatened legal action if they don't make changes.
Investigators have
not accused Apple
of breaking any
laws and the company is hardly the only American multinational to face scrutiny for using complex corporate structures and tax havens to sidestep taxes.
Everyone's at it, and while most people aren't
breaking the
law in the pursuit
of profit, there's a case for saying that manipulation should simply be accepted as part
of life.
They have had the extraordinary concern for why others are
breaking the Sabbath
law, but when they are shown that they are
not really concerned about the actual
law or the actual spirit
of that set
of laws, they do
not admit they are wrong: they plot to «destroy» the one who has pointed this out to them, and to everyone.
Neither a Jew nor Christian (since born before Christ) Cicero wrote
of Natural
Law — that the Creator instilled in us, rights that can
not be taken away, and
laws that can
not be
broken.
«There's a scene in
Breaking Bad «s first season in which Walter White's hoodrat lab assistant Jesse Pinkman (Aaron Paul) tells Walter he just can't «
break bad,» and — when you first hear this snippet
of dialogue — you assume what Jesse means is that you can't go from being a
law - abiding chemistry teacher to an underground meth cooker... But this, it turns out, was
not Jesse's point at all.
The
Law is a means
of coping with the affects / symptoms
of our
broken relationship with God [
broken on the human,
not the Divine side] and
not the cure
of mankind's individual and social ills.
It is illegal, but honestly if I was on food stamps and had a choice between
not being able to get to my McJob (that barely pays rent) and
breaking the
law (and going hungry half the month, but keeping a roof over my head) I would
break the
law, and you would see some guy buying expensive food for himself, while I, the actual recipient, stretch the bag
of lentils from last month as far as I can.
If
not laws, there are certainly plenty
of rules that people are allowed to
break in the name
of religion.
I don't know you, but I think it's fair to say you've
broken some
of God's
laws.
The religious leaders (many
of them giant hypocrites) couldn't condemn Jesus for
breaking any
of God's
laws.
If religion / service / whatever gets the attention off
of yourself and gets you off the booze / drugs / self - absorbtion, and it doesn't hurt anybody else or
break the
law, go for it.
Georgetown
Law Professor Michael Seidman says in the New York Times that we should conclude, «the American system
of government is
broken»
not because
of political divisions, but because
of the Constitution «with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.»
The same holds true
of corporate malfeasance, whether or
not it actually involves
breaking the
law.
This will include a strong sense
of personal sin,
not as the mere
breaking of some arbitrary
laws but as as a sort
of self - mutilation in the disfigurement
of our true, originally sinless humanity.
Everything in the universe, including our own brains, is built up on this principle
of control and direction, and Nature can
not break its own fundamental
law without the whole process
of the universe being undermined and coming to grief.
If the
law says don't drink, rest on Sunday (or the sabbath, one
of the ten commandments) or don't touch lepers, or tithe, give offerings, or anything you wan na add then Jesus certainly didn't follow all
of it and even
broke it, it would seem.
Therefore, they couldn't have
broken any
of God's
Laws because for them, there was no
law.
According to Mark, Jesus said, «The Sabbath
law was made for humankind and
not humankind for the Sabbath
law,» as he intentionally
broke the sacred Sabbath
laws of his religion.
If, however, on waking up I find only # 5 in the drawer, I don't conclude that the
laws of arithmetic have been
broken, but possibly the
laws of England.
The state has decreed the circumstances under which it will allow those who would otherwise be
breaking the
law, to obtain a license and thus
not be in violation
of the
law.
The
laws of the universe can
not be
broken, but these
laws themselves were observed and recorded by man to understand and predict the behavior
of matter.
I still don't understand how you don't seem to get that when someone
breaks a
law, they get punished, regardless
of religion.
I will however
not think for a moment «well a physical
law somewhere, somme time in the universe might have been
broken so I guess the physical
laws are only right 99 %
of the time because I think it could have happened so it did» It makes literally 0 sense.
Actually in Jewish commentaries, where the
law is
broken into 613 separate injunctions, the Ten Commandments constitute fifteen,
not ten,
of the 613 injunctions.
Jesus doesn't
break the
law, He fulfills the purpose and intent
of the
law.
With a number
of fellow pastors who became lifelong friends, Rauschenbusch studied, read, talked, debated and plumbed the new social theories
of the day, especially those
of the non-Marxist socialists whom John C. Cort has recently traced in Christian Socialism (Orbis, 1988) The pastors wove these theories together with biblical themes to form» «Christian Sociology,» a hermeneutic
of social history that allowed them to see the power
of God's kingdom being actualized through the democratization
of the economic system (see James T. Johnson, editor, The Bible in American
Law, Politics and Rhetoric [Scholars Press, 1985]-RRB- They pledged themselves to new efforts to make the spirit
of Christianity the core
of social renewal at a time when agricultural - village life was
breaking down and urban - cosmopolitan patterns were
not yet fully formed.
It's weird to me that you believe that even after 1000 drops and 1000
of the same result you still believe that if a random person you have never met claimed that his ball did
not fall then that's proof positive that the
law of gravity was
broken and that it is possible even though no one was there to verify it, or anyway to recreate it.
Since the crucifixion took place on the eve
of a Sabbath (probably
not a Saturday Sabbath, but a Passover holiday Sabbath), and because it was against Jewish
law for a crucified person to hang on the cross during a Sabbath, the Roman soldiers come around to
break the legs
of those being crucified.
NDE's for instance do
not break any
laws of physics, and I guarantee you that a) I have never experienced something that
broke natural
laws and b) neither has anyone else.
But when one party to a compact or covenant
breaks the fundamental agreements
of the compact, he
not only violates the terms
of contract, but he also violates the
laws of God which are embodied in that compact.
God doesn't create us in sin; He creates us in the curse, that is, frail and human and (in Pauline terms) «
of the flesh» (cf. Rom 7 - 8) but we then act on this frailty and
break God's holy
law, which, once again, renders us sinful.
If Jesus allowed for
breaking the honored Sabbath
laws would he
not also allow for a suspension
of the proscription against divorce if such were to liberate a person from the bondage
of an intolerable marriage?
And even that
law he did
not break because he made an agreement with the government (Iran) to be able to visit his family in Iran and build a Children «s Home there.Please read all
of the articles and you will also find out that he (Pastor Saeed) were
not even allow to be at his own Trial to defend himself and that witnesses for the government were intimidated
not to attend for fear
of reprises.
It is horrible, but it's
not the fault
of Penn State or The Catholic Church that these sick people
break the
law.
Ignorance
of the
law is
not excuse to
break the
law.
I don't know... «maybe» CNN was showing how some
law -
breaking people were attempting to «use» the cover
of a Church and all the goodies that go with being a Christian, as to how bad and illegal and immoral it was...?