Sentences with phrase «not by humankind»

The word natural means, «existing in or caused by nature; not by humankind.»

Not exact matches

The Good News borne by our risen Messiah who chose not one race, who chose not one country, who chose not one language, who chose not one tribe, who chose all of humankind!

Every step forward by humankind were taken that way, not by proof, regardless whether it related to God or science or any other facet of experience.

The creation, including humankind, is fashioned by divine hands but not out of divine stuff.

But humankind will not flourish by bread alone.

Where such a reality (as spelt out in 1) does not exist, either practically or experienced as such by those living in an illusory construction of the present («our inviolable shores» ideology) the talk of peace tends to take on impractical («brotherhood and sisterhood of all humankind») and essentialized («the global village») colours.

Thirty years later — after Mary Ann Evans had come to London and become Marian Evans, then (in her mind, though not in English law, since the man with whom she lived was married to another) Marian Lewes, and ultimately the great and famous novelist George Eliot» she wrote in very similar terms to Harriet Beecher Stowe: for the good of humankind, orthodox Christianity must be replaced by an ethical religion that would instill in us «a more deeply awing sense of responsibility to man, springing from sympathy with the difficulty of the human lot.»

Over the centuries Christians have seized on the cross as their central symbol, not by accident but because Christian insight has understood that it is in the one who loved us and gave himself for us that the truth about God and humankind is spoken; and that this loving and giving were consummated on Calvary.

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

On the other hand, if God decides to show mercy to humankind, then, by definition, He can not demand justice, even justice upon Jesus.

Any religious tradition claiming to be the absolute truth in a universe so marked by relativity leads not to the salvation of humankind but to its enslavement.

no its not, your God created Humankind... not gays, that's mankind's creation by choice or as he told you....

Unless, that is, our essentially middle - class life style is challenged by the poverty and oppression which is the lot of most of humankind, and we confront the hard truth that the issue is not reform of the welfare system, no matter how much that is needed, but the end of a capitalist economic order which increasingly divides the world into those who have and those who have not.

It is not just the crucifixion by itself, but the crucifixion of the God - made - flesh that brings salvation to humankind.

Finally no I don not believe that the last dinosaurs drown in the flood but were killed off by humankind.

You Said:» Finally no I don't believe that the last dinosaurs drowned in the flood but were killed off by humankind.»

Positive outcomes to problems do not certify the power of God except to those who read the story of humankind by the light of their faith.

Not cooking related, but another all purpose gift for anyone is the absolutely brilliant book Sapiens, A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari.

14 Humankind maintains a legal way of thinking about equality, which was created by Aristotle: legal equality is to treat similarly situated people alike.15 Therefore, «equality» becomes the right to be treated like the white male given that white man's culture is the dominant culture.16 In this way, when people are not similarly situated we should not treat them equally.

Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl It is difficult to read Nazi camp survivor Viktor Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning and not feel empowered to make use of every remaining second left on this earth, to leave an impact, to contribute to humankind, to identify and seize opportunities wherever they may reside.

We now lead a varied portfolio of treks and expeditions from the world - famous Inca Trail to Machu Picchu to breathtaking, not published, remote routes rarely trodden by humankind.

This time, The Gamesmen talk about Hillary Clinton and a Game Boy, Valve limiting Steam accounts that don't spend money, Steam charging for mods, the console Elder Scrolls Online beta, the Kerbal Space Program 1.0 release, Ancestors: The Humankind Odyssey, the Xbox One Gears of War remaster, Nintendo being surprised by the popularity of Amiibo, the NSA made a coloring book, and Silent Hills is no longer happening.

«The Communist Revolution Was Caused By The Sun» aligns the life of post-soviet rural residents and the futurological projects of Russian cosmism to emphasize that the goal of the early Soviet breakthroughs aimed at the conquest of outer space was not so much technical acceleration, but the common cause of humankind in their struggle against limitations of earthly life.

That isn't to say that there are no standouts: Jeremy Sharma's Terra Sensa - Lovell (2013) consists of casts of radiographs of collated data from collapsed stars, a surreal meditation on humankind's unceasing obsession with extraterrestrial terrain light - years beyond Earth; Peace Can Be Realised Even Without Order (2012) by teamLab is a massive, interactive platform of holographic musicians and dancers clad in traditional garb that respond to viewers» movements and reactions.

Gioni's curatorial premise, not to mention Allora & Calzadilla's installation, seems to take this notion to heart, reminding humankind that new systems of sustainability are inevitable on a planet that has been irrevocably altered by the careless endeavors of its inhabitants and also suggests that earth's only hope for survival may be found within the unpredictable landscape of the mind.

The exhibition was contextualized by a symposium entitled «Some Thoughts Regarding the Erection of the Palestinian Museum of Natural History and Humankind», a day - long program of presentations and critical discussion on Rabah's practice and the projects he is affiliated with, namely, The Palestinian Museum of Natural History and Humankind (2003 - ongoing), a work that is and is not about Palestine.

Saya Woolfalk, «Dashikimono # 2 (Day wear for lands not yet habitable by humankind),» 2014, Gouache on paper with collage, 45 x 62-1/8 inches (framed).

Such behavior could be the primary basis for a nest of emerging global challenges already visible to humankind on the far horizon, challenges soon be confronted by our children.

Anyone apprised of the palaeolithic massacre of the African and Eurasian megafauna, or the extermination of the great beasts of the Americas, or the massive carbon pulse produced by deforestation in the Neolithic must be able to see that the weapon of planetary mass destruction is not the current culture, but humankind.

The Bush administration made clear today that it doesn't intend to do anything about climate change in the final six months in office, announcing that instead of responding to the Supreme Court's mandate last year that the EPA determine the dangers posed to humankind by greenhouse - gas emissions they would simply request further public comment.

The argument that humankind rode out the MWP without a sweat, so to speak, is invalidated by the point that we weren't subjected to the rapid change we experienced during the past half - century.

Contrary to popular belief, you don't need a change in the sun or a volcanic eruption or pollution by humankind to cause global warming or cooling» (p. viii).

Nevertheless, it seems likely that a CO2 concentration in the range 500 to 900 ppm might produce a temperature rise of at least 2 °C from the late 19th century that could be problematic for humankind; (7) The potential negative impact on humanity has been exaggerated; (8) The only alternative to rising greenhouse gas concentrations is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions — whether this averts a «pending disaster» is not well understood; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 probably resulting in some warming; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are neither technically feasible nor economically affordable, and would necessitate inadequate energy supply to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing, leading to worldwide depression.

And this is because much discussion of the Anthropocene — its essential idea, its causes, its timing — is bedevilled by readings through old disciplinary lenses, which don't account for the true implications of humankind taking the planet into a new epoch.

Externalities may be addressed by either a tax / credit or some other public policy, public ownership and management of the commons, or privatization of the commons, or through court actions — each option may have it's own costs — for example, the large - scale privatization of the climate system may be impractical with given technology (analogy with toll roads), and even without that, it has at least an aesthetic cost (nature is supposed to be nature; and psychologically, humans may benifit from some amount of public space) and perhaps scientific (ie nature — in this context, nature as it is with relatively small impacts of humankind — is not nature if it is not being itself) costs; there may be inefficiencies in the court system that could be bypassed for issues that are easily addressed with legislation (unless we had a class - action lawsuit on behalf of all people now until the year).

Efforts under way by climate researchers — including reanalyses of existing tropical cyclone databases (20, 21)-- may mitigate the problems in applying the present observational tropical cyclone databases to trend analyses to answer the important question of how humankind may (or may not) be changing the frequency of extreme tropical cyclones.

However, much, if not all of the warming could be caused by natural temperature variations that are not related to humankind.

Do you suggest that Climate / environmental / economic issues and or impacts, on humankind, only pertain to non-theists and should not be discussed or investigated, by theists?