Sentences with phrase «not certain i understand»

I'm not certain I understand how your dogs (or you) might be exposed just by entering a hospital or nursing home.

I'm not certain I understand your question, but I * think * see where you're going.

Not exact matches

As hard as it may be for most people (and even for some curmudgeonly editors) to understand, certain things worth saying simply can't be said in a sentence or two.

Don't be shy if you don't understand an acronym or if you don't understand why something is done a certain way.

I've observed for some time how CEOs and other executives can't keep their cybersecurity programs in a silo where only a certain number of people fully understand and appreciate their impact.

So, if you use the correct version you'll sound intelligent to the grammarians of the world but you risk alienating a certain percentage of people who will not understand your meaning.

We understood in a few short months that our certain glory wouldn't be found in consumer social gifting — at least not in the way we had first imagined.

Sometimes if employees aren't using a certain software program, a system or a piece of equipment, they don't understand it.

Implications from deeper understanding of your customers typically involve changes in how you measure sales effectiveness, performance reviews, incentives, product mix, channels and sometimes «addition by subtraction,» or the process of improving performance by not selling to certain types of customers.

Today Facebook doesn't turn on its auto tagging features in countries like Canada and the EU because of privacy concerns, and there's a certain creep factor in having a computer second guess your photo - sharing choices or having software trying to parse your jokes to try to understand what you find funny.

Realized compensation is not a substitute for reported compensation in evaluating our compensation structure, but we believe that realized compensation is an important factor in understanding that the value of compensation that Mr. Musk ultimately realizes is dependent on a number of additional factors, including: (i) the vesting of certain of his option awards only upon the successful achievement of a number of market capitalization increase and operational milestone targets, including milestones that have not

As a result of this failure, the Finance Department released a set of proposed tax changes: that were unnecessarily complex; deficient in addressing certain double taxation issues; not well thought through in addressing intergenerational transfers of family businesses; and that were not understanding of the application of the alternative minimum tax to minors in order to access the lifetime capital gains exemptions through the proposed election procedure in 2018.

If an investor does not understand the risks associated with certain securities, he / she should seek the advice of an independent adviser.

Creating an imperative to understand new communication mediums and approaches to have buyers not only engage but adopt certain viewpoints.

Before any User decides to purchase, hold and use digital tokens, the User should make certain that he fully understood all risks, including but not limited to risk of losing access to tokens due to loss of private key (s), risks associated with the ethereum platform protocol, risk of hacking and security weaknesses, risk of uninsured losses, risks associated with uncertain regulations and enforcement actions.

When I say I don't understand I mean I do understand what a certain business does and how it makes money, but I don't understand what it will look like in the next five to ten years.

There are people who understand certain facts and those who don't.

If CNN streamed a REAL evolution debate between 2 scientists about a certain fossil and its classification, nobody would tune in because they wouldn't understand half the things they are referring to.

Unfortuneately, its taking a LOOONG time for many Islamic countries to evolve, and understand that certain teachings from yr 700 can't be implemented in today's society.

Just like Docdoofus — they are certain they alone are correct and everyone who disagrees is just not proficient, can't read, doesn't understand, blah, blah, blah.

Missouri Synod theologians had traditionally affirmed the inerrancy of the Bible, and, although such a term can mean many things, in practice it meant certain rather specific things: harmonizing of the various biblical narratives; a somewhat ahistorical reading of the Bible in which there was little room for growth or development of theological understanding; a tendency to hold that God would not have used within the Bible literary forms such as myth, legend, or saga; an unwillingness to reckon with possible creativity on the part of the evangelists who tell the story of Jesus in the Gospels or to consider what it might mean that they write that story from a post-Easter perspective; a general reluctance to consider that the canons of historical exactitude which we take as givens might have been different for the biblical authors.

Here's the deal, Yes, it used to be 28 billion years, now it's 14 billion but that's not on whims of scientists who just want to screw with the common everyday man, it's when certain evidence comes to light and we have to revise our understanding.

I'm really not understanding how being asked to work in certain reasonable attire is a problem or infringes on her religious freedom.

Science and religion only «conflict» when two people (one claiming to be in each area) are both too certain of that which isn't really known or understood.

In a book called «On the Road to Civilisation, A World History» (Philadelphia 1937) it said, «Early Christianity was little understood and was regarded with little favour by those who ruled the pagan world... Christians refused to share certain duties of Roman Citizens... they would not hold political office.»

«Not sure I understand you, it takes hardly anything to fully explain the case behind rejection of religion: «We don't know for certain.»

-- Not sure I understand you, it takes hardly anything to fully explain the case behind rejection of religion: «We don't know for certain.»

I am not saying that it is NECESSARY for him to reveal exactly what he believes in plain and simple words, but from my perspective, before an honest dialogue can take place, the participating parties should make sure that each other understands what they mean when they use certain words, and make sure each other understands what they believe concerning those words.

But John wants us to understand that God's blessing did not come solely to certain people who happened to be in that place at that time.

I can not tell you how many times I have thought I have rightly understood the Bible, only to learn a year or so later that I was hopelessly confused about a certain text or passage.

And, understand, I'm not trying to attack or defend any certain viewpoint, I'm criticizing the logical delivery of the viewpoint and exploring other ways of formulating the viewpoint that might be logically valid.

My disagreements with the five points of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or understanding of Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition of certain biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, etc, etc..

Altizer does not understand himself as a man who, because of holding certain traditional values, still calls himself a Christian.

The more one considers this eventuality (which can not be dismissed as a myth, as certain morbid symptoms, such as Sartrian existentialism, show) the more does one tend to the view that the grand enigma presented by the phenomenon of Man is not the question of knowing how life was kindled on earth, but of understanding how it might be extinguished on earth without being continued elsewhere.

It is content to acknowledge that while there may be certain basic conditions for understanding or agreement, one does not need to be able to specify those conditions.

We focus not on matters that we believe will lead us to a deeper understanding of God, but on matters that we must master in order to become skilled in certain professional techniques.

If he can so lose himself in the service of the spirit that it never occurs to him to take care for meat and drink; if he is certain that want will not distract him, and that distress will not confound for him the structure of his life, and teach him to rue that he did not first master the simple things before he presumed to understand more — then he may indeed venture, and his greatness will be more glorious than the serene security of the lilies of the field.

Hello Jeremy, I have been having horrible thoughts about God and not understanding why he lets certain things in life happen.

Perhaps I may not even have understood some of these things, perhaps they are simply demanded by love for the others, for the Church, which means a certain member of the Church at a certain point of time.

While it is true that those who have experienced a particular grief may be better suited to help someone in the same situation, it is also certain that we don't have to have a marriage coming apart at the seams to understand one that is.

The philosophical «God» is understood, if not independently of religious intuition, then definitely beyond its singular appearance (RM 88) 43 Over against the philosophical approach, Christianity developed the double strategy which we have analyzed as «religious intuition» contributing finally to the formation of revelational theology:» (1) Christianity proceeded not from any metaphysics, but it «has always been a religion seeking a metaphysics» (RM 50).45 Christianity strove for theological rationalization, 46 (2) Christianity, however, did not follow any certain metaphysics (PR 66 - 68), but «has been true to its genius for keeping its metaphysics subordinate to the religious fact to which it appeals» (RM 69).

The question of richness is only relevant when it can be shown that a certain structure of understanding brings to light actual characteristics which a different structure of understanding can not perceive.

We do not know all things like God does so we can not fully nor can we judge God who knows all things and why He allows certain things we do not fully understand to happen to us but with out evil we will not experience His goodness.

As a group, Christians and others may come to understandings on love or compassion or certain universal concepts... but even they wouldn't say that the «god» they know is exactly as they describe him... in part because you can't have that kind of universality without also haveing the humility to know you only have partial comprehension in the face of an infinite, and ultimately unknowable, god.

In challenging process theology to state explicitly that God sides with the oppressed, and to do so in a way that does not rule out the possibility of righteous counterviolence, I understand Jones to be challenging process theology to explicate the social - ethical consequences of accepting certain metaphysical truths in order that black theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for liberation.

Your statements are contradictory as to whether Jesus lived the life of a Jew and thus did not understand certain subjects, or as to whether He lived the life of the Good News.

Although I don't subscribe to this belief myself, I can understand certain among us, even the elite, in some cases preferring to tell a little lie to themselves rather than face life at its worst.

If we fully grasp the implications of this we will see that faith is not merely a matter of a certain understanding of the world, which is important, but a certain way of standing up before the world, of living in it.

I did not understand him to be equating Freudian therapy with modern neuroscience; I thought, rather, that he took his own distaste for what he sees as certain mystifications in the former as a point de départ for reflections on a deterministic and mechanistic philosophy he finds even more distasteful.

just like my toddler doesn't understand why I have certain [protective] rules in my house