Sentences with phrase «not change its public education»

Can Korea maintain its educational edge if it does not change its public education system into a student - centered one that can personalize learning for each child's different learning needs and be intrinsically motivating?

Not exact matches

There was a character education movement in traditional public schools for years, but, apparently, that kind of curriculum didn't seem to change the dynamic that it was intended to improve.

«It's trying to confuse people, but it doesn't substantially change anything,» said Diane Venezia Livingston, a mother of three and founder of Port Washington Advocacy for Public Education, a group that opposes tying test scores to teacher evaluations.

«I am not running because I think what could be accomplished in public education is game - changing, is life - changing,» Moskowitz said during a press conference Thursday on the steps of City Hall.

«This is not about changing our graduation standards,» stated Emily DeSantis, assistant state education commissioner for public affairs.

«We will push back against those who want to change public education, but don't know a damn thing about public education.»

On public education, Mr. Cuomo also hinted at great change, though it was not clear what exactly awaits the public school system this year.

The authors also call for fundamental changes in public health and drug treatment messaging: «Public education about antibiotics should highlight the fact that antibiotic resistance is primarily the result of antibiotic overuse and is not prevented by completing a course,» they public health and drug treatment messaging: «Public education about antibiotics should highlight the fact that antibiotic resistance is primarily the result of antibiotic overuse and is not prevented by completing a course,» they Public education about antibiotics should highlight the fact that antibiotic resistance is primarily the result of antibiotic overuse and is not prevented by completing a course,» they wrote.

I think the change in education would understandably be notably different between public and private, not public.

Public unions have been exempt in large measure from these global changes, given that public education is run by a dominant firm — one with the lion's share of the market that its small fringe competitors can not disPublic unions have been exempt in large measure from these global changes, given that public education is run by a dominant firm — one with the lion's share of the market that its small fringe competitors can not dispublic education is run by a dominant firm — one with the lion's share of the market that its small fringe competitors can not displace.

The U.S. and the U.K. were both awakening to being «nations at risk,» due in no small part to the parlous state of their public education systems, and reformers in both countries were pushing for big changes — changes that their respective «education establishments» didn't want to make.

Along the way, I've learned some important lessons about what works in public education, what doesn't, and what (and who) are the biggest obstacles to the transformative changes we still need.

Our findings reveal more stability than change in public opinion over the five years since the Education Next — PEPG survey began, suggesting that the momentous policy developments of the past year were not caused by — nor have they yet produced — broad changes in popular views.

The tactic of the education establishment, to routinely call «for more money to address problems that they frequently argued didn't exist,» notes Toch, was far less credible than Shanker's approach: fighting «to change public education in order to preserve it.»

This is all the more impressive since the latest Florida Department of Education report found that «public school students who ultimately became program participants are more likely to be the relatively lower - performing students in their schools, a fact that has not changed over time.»

«What [this recognition] means is that we are changing the face of public education because we take excuses away for why a child can't learn.»

If we want to change public education, we can't just help obvious winners.

The prospects of substantial improvement in public education without substantial changes in the education system itself are not good.

Having the Secretary of Education, state boards, and a bunch of DC advocacy groups declare a particular approach to be best and cram it into place in the middle of a financial crisis with virtually no public debate or input from educators or parents did not convince local officials, educators, and parents to change their minds.

Just as I reached the conclusion that urban districts can't be fixed and, therefore, we need to create a new delivery system for public education in America's cities, a large and growing number of reformers interested in teacher preparation believe that we can't trust the old system to change adequately and that, instead, we need to create new pathways into the profession.

Changing the existing belief that the need for education after high school is not universal will demand a unified approach from the Department of Education, the education establishment, parents, employers, and theducation after high school is not universal will demand a unified approach from the Department of Education, the education establishment, parents, employers, and thEducation, the education establishment, parents, employers, and theducation establishment, parents, employers, and the public.

A child's learning needs do not change based on the type of public school they attend — there's no excuse for education funding that is disconnected from that reality.

Since the Nation at Risk report of 1980's, Standarized Testing and preparing for these test have greatly changed public education and not for the better.

For this reason, proponents of improving public education in Arizona can not wait to develop strategies geared to a changing electorate.

Requiring that college students have higher grade point averages in order to become teachers, eliminating teacher tenure and linking a teacher's evaluation and their job status to statistical changes in Connecticut's standardized tests is not Education Reform — nor are the expanding efforts to «privatize» our Constitutionally mandated public educatioEducation Reform — nor are the expanding efforts to «privatize» our Constitutionally mandated public educationeducation system.

The critics of modern school reform that I know are people who see enormous trouble in the public education system, but don't think it will be fixed by spending billions of dollars on questionable teacher assessment systems linked to standardized test scores, or expanding charter schools that are hardly the panacea their early supporters claimed they would be, or handing out federal education dollars based on promises to change schools according to the likes and dislikes of Education Secretary Arne Duncan, whose record as superintendent of Chicago public schools was hardly distieducation system, but don't think it will be fixed by spending billions of dollars on questionable teacher assessment systems linked to standardized test scores, or expanding charter schools that are hardly the panacea their early supporters claimed they would be, or handing out federal education dollars based on promises to change schools according to the likes and dislikes of Education Secretary Arne Duncan, whose record as superintendent of Chicago public schools was hardly distieducation dollars based on promises to change schools according to the likes and dislikes of Education Secretary Arne Duncan, whose record as superintendent of Chicago public schools was hardly distiEducation Secretary Arne Duncan, whose record as superintendent of Chicago public schools was hardly distinguished.

I ask not that public school special educators and administrators circumvent special education guidelines and laws but that they approach the process with their brains and put their hearts in their practices to allow for positive changes in special education.

Most parents with children in public schools do not support recent changes in education policy, from closing low - performing schools to shifting public dollars to charter schools to private school vouchers, according to a new poll to be released Monday by the American Federation of Teachers.

If we can not deliver on this commitment, we are failing in our public education responsibility, and no historical attachment to a particular delivery system should prevent our making the necessary structural changes.

If Secretary Duncan is irritated that so many people are now opposing the standards and the accompanying testing, he might want to learn that, in general, people do not like turning around and finding out that the entire basis upon which they thought their children's education rests has been changed without public discussion.

In 1989, when the Chicago School Reform Act gave rise to local school councils and other major policy changes, Linda Lenz, then an education writer for the Chicago Sun - Times, saw the need for a publication that would focus on public education with the kind of detail and depth that her newspaper and others could not.

Public education is at a crossroad, and much like the brick - and - mortar retailers of 10 or 15 years ago, if it does not adapt it will be swept aside in a tide of changing technology.

Because we have such a strong shared sense of what schooling is (and isn't), even small - scale changes to the way we think about public education will be likely to spark large - scale resistance.

Through the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates has not only donated billions of dollars to public schools, but will now sponsor in - depth research on improving teaching that may change the face of public school education forever.

Alan Borsuk, Senior Fellow in Law and Public Policy at Marquette University and former education reporter, says he's not surprised by the board members change in strategy.

It isn't a hard thing to become a hero in changing public education for the better.

Maryland fell from its perch as the No. 1 state in public education on Thursday, but the shove came from a change in the ranking criteria, not from any slide in performance.

Years of public opinion research conducted by Public Agenda suggests that in addressing these questions, education policymakers should not necessarily redesign education to suit changing demograpublic opinion research conducted by Public Agenda suggests that in addressing these questions, education policymakers should not necessarily redesign education to suit changing demograPublic Agenda suggests that in addressing these questions, education policymakers should not necessarily redesign education to suit changing demographics.

To improve education in America, the way education stakeholders and the public at large perceive authority and influence should change, recognizing that teachers have content and pedagogical expertise that administrators often don't.

More details of the changes to the way the Indiana Department of Education will assess schools under the state's accountability law, Public Law 221, haven't been made publiPublic Law 221, haven't been made publicpublic yet.

Educational advocates are concerned not only about changes in the use of tax - free college savings accounts (529 Plans), but also restrictions on the amount tax payers can deduct for state and local taxes, which in turn are used to fund public education.

A key improvement of ESAs over school vouchers and tax credits is that funds not used for K - 12 educational purposes can be «saved» or rolled over each year and used for continuing or higher education, thus changing the «use it or lose it» mentality in the current public school funding system.

This dramatic change in power distorts our political system, leading to not as much investment in the public goods needed to maintain a healthy middle class, including a great public education system.

We fully recognize that as a state, California does not fund public education at the levels that our students deserve — but until that changes, we must do the best we can with what we have.

Historically, we have seen that change has not often come quickly to our public education system.

Articles like this one do not reflect the reality of our compliance practices and they completely ignore the larger mission of CCSA Advocates, which is to build political will for positive changes in the public education system that will help all students succeed.

But White speaks for many anti-Common Core parents around the country when she notes: «We've already been through eight years of «transformational change» in public education and we don't need any more... I want a [n] Education] Secretary to hand off responsibility over education to the parents where it belongs... Yet, here is DeVos «ensuring» me of «opportunities» for my children — whom she doesn't know — in order to make sure she can benevolently «give» my kids what they need to fulfill their «highest potential» — which is MY joeducation and we don't need any more... I want a [n] Education] Secretary to hand off responsibility over education to the parents where it belongs... Yet, here is DeVos «ensuring» me of «opportunities» for my children — whom she doesn't know — in order to make sure she can benevolently «give» my kids what they need to fulfill their «highest potential» — which is MY joEducation] Secretary to hand off responsibility over education to the parents where it belongs... Yet, here is DeVos «ensuring» me of «opportunities» for my children — whom she doesn't know — in order to make sure she can benevolently «give» my kids what they need to fulfill their «highest potential» — which is MY joeducation to the parents where it belongs... Yet, here is DeVos «ensuring» me of «opportunities» for my children — whom she doesn't know — in order to make sure she can benevolently «give» my kids what they need to fulfill their «highest potential» — which is MY job.»

Understand how to change your language, and your actions, to make you not only a more powerful communicator, but also the strong leader public education needs.

But I will proudly stand by my statement that a Democrat who proposed doing away with teacher tenure for all public school teachers and repealing collective bargaining for teachers in the poorest school; who refuses to de-couple inappropriate standardized tests from teacher evaluation; who diverts a hundred million dollars a year from public schools to prop up unaccountable charter schools that refuse to educate their fair share of bi-lingual students and students who need special education services; and who refused to settle the CCEJF lawsuit and develop a long - term change to Connecticut's school funding formula... DOES NOT deserve the badge of honor that comes with being endorsed by teacher unions.

Historian Diane Ravitch criticized Obama's Education Secretary Arne Duncan for his stances, which lead many public education advocates to feel as though electing GOP candidate Mitt Romney would not change much about the current direction of the nation's school Education Secretary Arne Duncan for his stances, which lead many public education advocates to feel as though electing GOP candidate Mitt Romney would not change much about the current direction of the nation's school education advocates to feel as though electing GOP candidate Mitt Romney would not change much about the current direction of the nation's school policies.