Sentences with phrase «not change the debate»

Even if the conclusions are solid a year from now that the Earth's changing CO2 levels are natural, it will not change the debate by very much.

Not exact matches

The Republican Party's fast journey from debating how to combat human - caused climate change to arguing that it does not exist is a story of big political money, Democratic hubris in the Obama years and a partisan chasm that grew over nine years like a crack in the Antarctic shelf, favouring extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric over co-operation and conciliation.
The hurricane might have helped put climate change back on the White House agenda, and once the Keystone debate resumed earlier this year it didn't take long for environmentalist groups to link Canada's planned pipeline to the devastating storm.
The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in with a report arguing that global grain markets have changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.
The team debates the possible role of Japanese offensive strike capability but does not recommend a policy change on that point.
The gun control debate has intensified in the wake of the Parkland shooting in February, and while some steps have been taken to tighten laws and regulations, not much has changed.
They quickly pointed out that Europe is too large simply to assume that the world can absorb large changes in its capital and trade accounts, and as they debated about the ways global constraints would affect the assumptions about European surpluses most of them quickly decided that either the markets would not permit surpluses of this size, perhaps by bidding up the euro, or the impact of these surpluses would be very negative for the world.
Tsipras said that Greece «has proved that democracy can not be blackmailed; Greece has made a brave choice and one which will change the debate in Europe.
The time for debating whether or not the climate is changing is long past.
Compare that to the dogmatic stance of religion — a phony belief system that starts and end with unproven manmade tribal myths, not open to true debate, and that only changes in order to maintain power over the gullible.
Gender is not the only «traditional view» that the Church has debated and changed its mind.
I am a Christian but avoid christian religions other than as a place of meditation, worship and intellectual debate, certainly not as a place for moral guidance as they change the rules with the politics of the age.
People all over the world, both in positions of power and not, seem to believe that there is room for debate on the issues of climate change, humanity's involvement and the need to transition to a low - carbon future.
That opens the door for folks to make the logical step that since dialogue and debate will not change you or make you go away then maybe physical violence will.
No such statement is perfect and I would want some changes — especially in connection with the definition of torture — before signing this one, but «An Evangelical Declaration Against Torture» is an exceedingly valuable contribution to a public debate of which we dare not tire.
Using the Bible as the basis for your position in any debate is pointless — it doesn't persuade anyone to change their position.
As a new generation preparing to tackle the age - old debate about predestination and free will, our positions don't have to change but our attitudes can.
If the long story of the Trinitarian debate in Christendom is to be re-enacted in our present time its outcome may result in somewhat different formulations from those of the past, but scarcely in a substantive change of the affirmation that God is One and that however the doctrine of the Personae is stated it must still be affirmed that the Father is not the Son and the Son is not the Father and the Spirit can not be equated with either.
Mike i have been thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i think we will get into a good debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz
Trust me, in most cases the debate won't change any minds but there are a few instances where debates like this do eventually lead to a change of heart / mind / opinion.
I am no Scholar but, I believe God has the power to change prophecy the way that he did with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning changed due to disobedience so who's to say our men or intended leadership has overall been disobedient, and many women have been forced to lead and in that leading women have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD changes he's always the same but, he does have the power to make changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of debating back and forth over our version of the Bible we should be sure we have the Holy Spirit and real relationship with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion
Well... I know all us is aware that debate for or against the existence of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit doesn't change Him... He just is, was, and is to come... whether we feel we win a debate or not... Hence...?
It is the opinion of this writer that reasonable and constructive change is more likely to occur, and to be more effective in its occurrence, if analysis, debate, and action are based not merely on opinion and speculation but on researched and informed insight.
So until we can change childhood in America, we won't be able to roll this back and make room of open debate.
The new standards change how lease assets are accounted for and presented on the balance sheet and should not impact the decision in the «lease vs. purchase» debate.
Whether or not you feel that a protest is necessary for change is a debate that can be held in the comments, because although some will feel it is the only way that fans can make club officials see want what is wanted, others will say that Wenger deserves more respect than to be forced out the club by protest and a lack of support when he is only following Kroenke's orders.
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold
It's like debating gun control or climate change, there is no way to win an abstract debate without the force of power because these ideas aren't rooted in a self evident righteousness.
Not sure how many minds it will change in this debating chamber, but let's just agree to disagree.
@ Ny Gunner, if i offended you by saying your opinion is not encouraging fans to believes they can do something, i am sorry no body is an emblem of knowledge here and we are debating for a panel to judge on the best point mostly we are all right by consensus that we want changes.
Isn't the whole debate about the pace of the change required.
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a change MR is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold
This was one of the reasons why a change at the very top was needed but the stick the fans gave former manager, Gary Megson, wasn't called for nor deserved but we're sure Owen Coyle will get a tremendous reception at The Reebok this Sunday, although whether he leave there with the love still in tact is another question, and one that's open to debate.
I just know at age 40 this is unfair and if things don't change I really am debating moving on cause I want a wife not a roommate and I want a lover, not a spouse.
For most pediatricians, the vaccine debate doesn't revolve around trying to change the minds of anti-vaccine proponents.
I've read over and over again (not on this blog but on other message boards debating the same issue) that these allergy kids need to understand that they are not the centre of the universe and that they will grow up feeling entitled if everyone changes things to protect them.
But this change did not occur without much discussion, debate, and research.
The development taking place in both towns has sparked much debate, whether it involves efforts to make sure high - density housing and newly built retail spaces don't change the character of the historic downtowns or ensuring teardowns — new homes built on the site of razed ones — don't clash with neighboring homes or the town's character.
«Change» candidates have a particular need to convince voters that they're a safe choice, as Reagan's experience in 1980 shows — he ran very close with Carter until the debates, which allowed him to convince enough Americans that he wasn't a crazed bomb - thrower.
The 2012 treaty changes are not put to voters, except in Ireland where a «no» vote in early 2013 stirs debate on Ireland leaving the euro.
Even if the debate does not reflect real change, limited action is expected on the economic front.
There was not legislative text presented at the meeting as lawmakers continued to debate what changes would be made.
I still believe, as I put it in chapter two, that «software», not «hardware» — the long, slow waves of cultural change, not the more obvious technological and economic changes that figure so prominently in public debate and academic social science — hold the key to the British predicament; that our ills form an interdependent system or, in medical language, a «syndrome»; and that they reflect the bewilderment and disorientation of a people who have forgotten the history that shaped them, and who therefore no longer know who they are.
In backing the tax code changes this year, Heastie appears to be making an effort to not only push Cuomo, but get out in front of what would have been a debate not scheduled to reach Albany until next year and after an election.
They are there to facilitate small changes in law which do not require much debate.
Okay fine, maybe the debates aren't really that exciting, and maybe they won't likely change the dynamic of the election in any meaningful way (past ones rarely have).
In the current debate the option of fundamentally changing the innards of the Palace does not appear to be an option.
If the government insists on handing out honours (whether or not it should is a separate debate), surely it would be better to give the awards names that suit contemporary Britain and its changed values?
Not coincidentally, the current plan is for such changes to be debated and, Republicans hope, passed sometime around the end of the year — the same time the debt ceiling will be coming back up.
Two best political books I read this were «Nixonland» by Rich Perlstein (which covers the eclipse of American liberalism and rise of conservatism between 1964 - 1972) and «The Persistence of Poverty» by Charles Karelis, which is short, witty and will change the way that you think about the whole debate around welfare and poverty issues (get»em on Amazon if they aren't in the shops).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z