Not exact matches
Unlike
other developed
countries, the bulk
of Japan's debt (well over 90 %) is
not held offshore but rather by its own
citizens?
We have a representative democracy which tends to validate religious belief instead
of recognizing that they should have NO ROLE where religion is concerned
other than to protect it's
citizens, religious or
not, and allowing all to live within the basic laws
of the
country which should have wide support and sound evidence supporting the need for them.
Politicians, it is said, must be concerned in their public role
not about
citizens of other countries, however impoverished; rather, they must focus on the wants and needs
of their own
country's
citizens.
I also completely agree with both Marie and D. Leaders
of this
country should
not cater to one religion over the
others, since our
citizens embrace many different faiths.
This makes sense to you, although it makes no sense at all to me (and I would predict it makes no sense to the
other 5 billion
of us non Muslims), I would have less problems if it were applied to all
citizen of that
country, both men and women, those in power and the working class, the rulers and the ruled, but that is
not the case.
Aside from THAT I will bet you that there are MANY things mentioned in you «bible» that you and
others of your «faith» don't follow... but yet you still feel compelled to force SOME things found in your bible on
other citizens of this
country.
Not only has science made great strides in improving the lives
of those with physical challenges, but our fellow
citizens are also taught to be more kind and tolerant than most people in
other countries and
other centuries.
If the US would keep its nose out
of the Mideast and
other locations, where it doesn't belong, and take care
of the
citizens of the US, there would be plenty
of money to allow all to obtain a basic need and to rebuild the crumbling infrastructure
of this
country.
I could imagine a couple such reasons, e.g., that US
citizens will be eligible for consular protection no matter where they live, and so they should darn well pay for it - but that would apply to
citizens of other countries, as well, so it doesn't really tell why the US took a different view
of this matter than everyone else.
These enemies were implicitly made up
of the «
citizens of nowhere», those massed ranks
of «
other» who ultimately did
not have loyalty to this
country.
In the «English cities», the new
citizens identifying as British (who had often arrived on work or study visas from
countries such as the Philippines and Nigeria) told us more than half their friends were
of other ethnicities (although we did
not ask them how extensive or deep their social connections were) but had low place attachment.
One would be that the negotiations on the withdrawal agreement had
not been finalised, meaning that aspects
of the legal rights
of British
citizens and British businesses in
other EU
countries could be left in limbo.
The data (EDIT: Provided by the OP) also doesn't support that (EDIT: the OP's assertion that) American's love the constitution more than
other countries because we do
not have a similar line for rate at which another
country's constitution is googled by their
citizens (What's the trend
of Canadians googling the Canadian Constitution?).
What readily comes to mind at the mention
of ROPAA or diaspora voting is enfranchising Ghanaian
citizens in United Kingdom, the United States
of America and
other civilized nations in Europe,
not African
countries like Nigeria, Togo, Benin, Gambia etc..
Also affected are
citizens of these
countries who live in
other countries (US and otherwise), who are therefore
not included in these population figures.
I expressed my views in this regard on WhatsApp last weekend, «Any
country in which its elites consider re-electing a president like Buhari just as thousands
of citizens are murdered across the
country with
not a single person arrested; a president who can
not make an intelligent conversation on any policy or global issue with
other global leaders; a president whose EFCC and DSS engage in open confrontation; a regime which crippled the economy and relies on cyclical movements in oil prices as its sole economic lever; a regime under which 10 million jobs are lost; and key accusations against top officials are treated with levity; just as the regime appears complicit in the invasion
of its senate by thugs and seizure
of mace... such a
country is in serious trouble, that is if it isn't doomed.
The statement re-emphasize that the command will
not stand idly and allow any person or group
of persons to violate the laws
of country by engaging in conducts that are perilous to public peace and order as well as the lives and properties
of other law abiding
citizens, please.
A government who does
not listen to the voices
of the masses is definitely practicing a one party state governance and
citizens when suppressed results to street demonstrations and
other unrests as being experienced in our neighboring
country, Togo.
«They have been saying they want to keep the
citizens of this
country in the dark when it comes to their plans for Brexit so as
not to give anything away to the
other side.»
«Indeed, Cabinet just approved a 0.02 per cent deductions in all imports outside AU as a fund to support the activities
of AU, so that AU will
not go begging
other countries for its
citizens,» President Nana Akufo - Addo stated in a speech read on his behalf at the closing ceremony
of a five day orientation workshop for newly appointed envoys in Accra.
In that regard, you must
not think taxes
of Lagos state
citizens or IGR, you must create some kind
of platform that would allow some
other people who are outside to tell us how to run a
country in a State.
«Informing
citizens about the health
of the nation and discussing pivotal science and policy issues such as mental health, chronic and emerging diseases and
other public health threats, and vaccine research are important to
not only advance the national dialogue but also improve the
country's overall well - being.»
But I think one
of the things that scientists and
other people concerned about science education in the
country need to do is make it clear to publishers that as
citizens and voters, wherever they live, whatever state or town that they live [in], they will make sure that their elected officials know that textbook X, Y or Z is
not to be used in this district because
of its bad science.
The news comes on the heels
of a statement from Oscar - nominated Iranian director Asghar Farhadi stating that he will
not be attending the ceremony, even if granted a travel exception, as «condemnation
of the unjust conditions forced upon some
of my compatriots and the
citizens of the
other six
countries trying to legally enter the United States
of America.»
Hanushek was careful to state that the goal was
not to strengthen U.S. performance at the expense
of other nations: The creation
of well - educated
citizens does
not constitute a «a zero - sum game that
countries or states are playing against each
other,» but one in which every
country and state can become more productive, and create more wealth for one another by boosting and sharing their talents.
Nationally, somewhere between one - quarter and half
of Americans volunteer every year.1 This spirit
of volunteerism is one
of the ways Americans are unique when compared with
citizens of other nations.2 Perhaps this is why the idea
of service opportunities for young people has been popular in the United States at least since former President John F. Kennedy called on his fellow Americans to «Ask
not what your
country can do for you — ask what you can do for your
country.»
Those
of us who see ourselves as global
citizens are
not abandoning
other identities; such as allegiances to our
countries, ethnicities, and political beliefs.
Except for job # 4, which is defined as a «local hire,» the
other three are classified as «international hires,» which, while I can
not find a clear definition on the site, implies to me that you can apply if you're a
citizen of any
of the 186
countries that are members
of the World Bank (although proficiency in English is described as «Essential» for each position).
English essay writer is
not a
citizen of Russia, Pakistan, Egypt or any
other country that has nothing to do with quality English essay writing.
Citizens of many
other countries traveling, especially to the US, are
not so lucky.
Note the eligibility for NEXUS is
not quite as broad as it is for Global Entry, which allows for
citizens of some
other countries to apply.
a nation
of remarkably productive, often well - paid workers who are becoming increasingly reluctant to pause from their labors and refresh their souls — a nation whose cash - drenched corporate employers typically don't pay for much time off (less than two weeks annually, on average), a nation whose globe - gripping federal government is the only one in the whole industrialized world
not to legally require generous periods
of paid kick - back - and - hang time — is a nation that's socially screwed up, particularly in comparison with European
countries like France, which orders its
citizens outside to play for the entire month
of August and a few
other weeks spread through the year.
The United States does have an agreement with some
countries agreeing to honor the copyrights
of each
others»
citizens but it does
not extend into every
country.
Fingerprinting is also waived for
other nonimmigrant aliens, while they maintain nonimmigrant status, who are nationals
of countries which do
not require fingerprinting
of United States
citizens temporarily residing therein.
If a foreign
country's company or
other organization that is
not the US government asks if I'm a
citizen of the US, am I required to state that I am?
You do
not care that major decisions affecting the legal and societal needs
of the
citizens Ontario will be made by managers in
other countries who have different agendas and interests to those
of our public.
It is useful because it is honest; because it leaves
not even the most obscure and friendless
citizen without means
of obtaining justice from a neighbouring State; because it obviates occasions
of quarrels between States on account
of the claims
of their respective
citizens; because it recognizes and strongly rests on this great moral truth that justice is the same whether due from one man or a million, or from a million to one man; because it teaches and greatly appreciates the value
of our free republican national government, which places all our
citizens on an equal footing, and enables each and every
of them to obtain justice without any danger
of being overborne by the weight and number
of their opponents; and because it brings into action and enforces this great and glorious principle — that the people are the sovereign
of this
country, and consequently that fellow
citizens and joint sovereigns can
not be degraded by appearing with each
other in their own courts to have their controversies determined.
52 However, the mere fact that it might appear desirable, for economic reasons or in order to preserve the family unit in the territory
of the Union, for members
of a family consisting
of third
country nationals and a Union
citizen who is a minor to be able to reside with that
citizen in the territory
of the Union in the Member State
of which he is a national is
not sufficient in itself to support the view that the Union
citizen would be forced to leave the territory
of the Union if such a right
of residence were
not granted (see, to that effect, Dereci and
Others, paragraph 68).
As the Advocate General observes in point 44
of his Opinion, it is the relationship
of dependency between the Union
citizen who is a minor and the third
country national who is refused a right
of residence that is liable to jeopardise the effectiveness
of Union citizenship, since it is that dependency that would lead to the Union
citizen being obliged, in fact, to leave
not only the territory
of the Member State
of which he is a national but also that
of the European Union as a whole, as a consequence
of such a refusal (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 45, and Dereci and
Others, paragraphs 65 to 67).
67 In paragraph 48
of the judgment in Dereci and
Others, the Court took the view that, in so far as the disputes in the main proceedings concerned Union
citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third
country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes
of living as a family with those
citizens, Directive 2003/86 was
not applicable to those third
country nationals.
41 With respect, first, to Directive 2004/38, it must be recalled that it is
not all third
country nationals who are family members
of a Union
citizen who derive rights
of entry into and residence in a Member State from that directive, but only those who are family members
of a Union
citizen who has exercised his right
of freedom
of movement by settling in a Member State
other than the Member State
of which he is a national (Case C ‑ 127 / 08 Metock and
Others [2008] ECR I ‑ 6241, paragraph 73, and Case C ‑ 256 / 11 Dereci and
Others [2011] ECR I ‑ 11315, paragraph 56).
The hope was to attract delegates primarily
of the
other nationalities but
not to the exclusion
of the host
country's
citizens.
The Atlas series Plan is
not available for US
citizens coming back to the USA, or
other Non US
citizens going back to their Home
Country /
Country of citizenship
Venezuela has seen reports
of miners being arrested since 2016, but with the announcement
of the Petro, there was a dramatic U-turn in those policies as the
country's newly - dubbed «cryptocurrency superintendent» Carlos Vargas confirmed that
citizens mining Bitcoin and
other cryptocurrencies were
not breaking the law.
This means any
country that participates in the CLOUD act can't trample the basic civil rights afforded to us as
citizens of the U.S. — and that rights
of citizens in
other countries can't be trampled by the U.S. government.