Sentences with phrase «not come from the side»

When the pulley is close to the ground, the resistance does not come from the side, which reduces the work of the deltoid.

Not exact matches

With the whole approach here, the vast majority of new funding is coming from folks like Mark and Priscilla Chan, and Emerson Collective, and John Doerr's Foundation, that not only have a very long timeline, but are explicitly interested in the impact side as well as the financial return.

He also said that some of the staff cuts will come from the P&G side of combination, not just the Gillette side.

The new revelation has come at a time when Mark Zuckerberg and team is facing criticism from all the sides for not taking precautionary measures well in time.

The UK's upcoming divorce from the EU will not come without costs, and no matter what the eventual scenario, those costs will be substantial and far - reaching, on both sides of the fence.

Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do not want you to come against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side witnesses as His testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God does not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?

Honestly that's a side point though, the big question is where did anything come from, not just life specifically.

the problem with some Christian is they don't know god... even just by acknowledging God they'd be a step in the right direction... but then Jesus said many will come and say i saved life on your name and God will respond «I do no know you» your name is not in the book of life those who are and have never separated from the side of god and god's wisdom...

Maybe you could bring in Christians from another church tradition or from the other side of the world to come and find fault with how your church is accomplishing (or not accomplishing) your mission.

It's easy for someone in the majority to make these claims of calmness and peace but that is not what us atheists see coming from the other side either.

For it is only in love that the unequal can be made equal, and it is only in equality or unity that an understanding can be effected, and without a perfect understanding the Teacher is not the God, unless the obstacle comes wholly from the side of the learner, in his refusing to realize that which had been made possible for him.

He no longer seeks the mystery, the divine, but is convinced that science will at one point decipher everything... The other side is that precisely science itself is now regaining an insight as to its limits, that many scientists today are saying: «Doesn't everything have to come from somewhere?»

Yet this touches on what makes Ezekiel a prophet to begin with; he forces us to question whether our discomfort over God's judgment comes not so much from fear of taking sides, or of being found on the wrong side, but from feeling affronted.

This is largely because Frank Viola has me convinced that Eve coming from Adam's side (not sexual organ) is a parallel to the church coming from Jesus» pierced side.

They can not understand that some of the prophecies are dual, some are both carnal and spiritual, such as the Promised Land is both the physical land of Israel with specific border lines as God directed, which HAS NOT come to pass yet, because those borders has never come to pass, and yet God promised those specific borders, and from the spiritual side, Heavnot understand that some of the prophecies are dual, some are both carnal and spiritual, such as the Promised Land is both the physical land of Israel with specific border lines as God directed, which HAS NOT come to pass yet, because those borders has never come to pass, and yet God promised those specific borders, and from the spiritual side, HeavNOT come to pass yet, because those borders has never come to pass, and yet God promised those specific borders, and from the spiritual side, Heaven.

These gods of the boutique can come from anywhere — native North American religion, the Indian subcontinent, some Pre-Raphaelite grove shrouded in Celtic twilight, cunning purveyors of otherwise worthless quartz, pages drawn at random from Robert Graves, Aldous Huxley, Carl Jung, or that redoubtable old Aryan, Joseph Campbell — but where such gods inevitably come to rest are not so much divine hierarchies as ornamental étagères, where their principal office is to provide symbolic representations of the dreamier sides of their votaries» personalities.

I think people get pulled into these arguments... how many times did the Pharisees seek to get Jesus to commit to» one side or the other» and he would come back at them from a place they were not expecting.

Many atheists came from religious backgrounds and wished to know then due to the knowledge found, left the belief in god behind... Yes, there are some agnostic religious people, but they still believe and therefore would side with religion, as the non believers either agnostic or not would side with the atheists.

«The days will come upon you,» he declared, «when your enemies will build around you a fortification with pointed stakes and will encircle you and distress you from every side, and they will dash you and your children within you to the ground, and they will not leave a stone upon a stone in you.»

I would say all sides come to the forefront, but I think that some of us see things from more than one side to begin with and that there are many «sides» (perspectives) that are out there, I don't think it is a polemic, and I don't think it is «sides» in terms of choosing sides in a war... more a dialogue where confrontations take place, but (hopefully) most of the time not with the intent of winners and losers (or, if that is the intent, that hopefully we realize that and adjust our own rhetoric to move away from that pardigm)

I would just like to point out that at least as many comments coming from the supposed religious side of the argument are just as if not more «hostile and demeaning» towards those of different or no faith.

Gay marriage is coming, you can either be on the right side of history, or the wrong side, but you can't stop history from happening.

In the later 1950s, as I matured within the loving bonds of that society, Africa became for me not one side of a bridge but a whole sphere of redemptive life, sustaining within itself those features which earlier I had felt must come from outside.

Those who come from other ecclesial communities and enter into full communion with the Catholic Church encounter great joy among some Catholics that they have, not to put too fine a point on it, «come over to our side.»

A congregation of believers assembled for the public worship of God knows that it did not come into existence at that moment, knows that it is not alone, knows that what is happening is happening because something has happened from God's side.

However, Rice also notes that there was, and always has been, another side both to Calvin and the Reformed tradition — a side that was less confident in the intellect's ability to answer all questions — a side that could acknowledge ambiguity and be open to mystery at the heart of the faith — and that understood God to be immanent as well as transcendent, and one whose «dependability came not from being unchanging, but from being loving.»

It comes from a particular vocal group of naturalists on one side and a much smaller but equally noisy lot of creationists on the other, both of whom have increasingly been declaring their respective philosophical views not merely to be true but to be true in a specifically scientific sense.

Each comes from a different impulse, as if the two sides of my mind don't agree with each other even though they are in conversation with each other.

I believe that the humility that God wants us to have comes from, not so much looking at the dark side of ourselves, analyzing all we think and do, or even recognizing our hypocrisy [you seem to obcess on that]; that can become a grind and lead us down the road of great depression.

If, abstracting altogether from the question of their value for the future spiritual life of the individual, we take them on their psychological side exclusively, so many peculiarities in them remind us of what we find outside of conversion that we are tempted to class them along with other automatisms, and to suspect that what makes the difference between a sudden and a gradual convert is not necessarily the presence of divine miracle in the care of one and of something less divine in that of the other, but rather a simple psychological peculiarity, the fact, namely, that in the recipient of the more instantaneous grace we have one of those Subjects who are in possession of a large region in which mental work can go on subliminally, and from which invasive experiences, abruptly upsetting the equilibrium of the primary consciousness, may come.

actually many pagans survived and went underground and also in places where the reaches of the catholic church did not get For example a whole other half Europe two whole continents on the other side of the ocean etc Paganism was driven into near extinction by it's brother religion that came from the same roots but it was not at all eradicated The irony find is Christians were persecuted by the Roman empire before the rule of Constantine and then during the burning times persecuted witches and pagans (aswell as non-pagans for corrupted reasons) An oximoron and hypocritical religion

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

If you're driving along a highway and a car comes at you from a side road, and you have to think what you ought to do, you're not likely to avoid an accident.

So bobby... are they going to stop each person before they make a profit from them and ask if they are on their side or not, and then refuse to make the profit from those they disagree with, or are they going to be the major league hypocrits we have come to expect?

As someone who changed his beliefs from one that didn't fit, to one that does, I can only counsel you to have courage and know that you will find your feet and come out on the other side more authentic to who you are.

Far from idealizing this moment of choice, To the Wonder understands that choice comes not in a moment of critical decision, but in a thousand moments that minutely move us toward one side or the other.

Mine didn't come out looking nearly as gorgeous as Tara's from Smells Like Home (maybe it's the lack of BBQ sauce oozing down the sides), but it's what's inside that counts!

On the plus side, they don't come from GMO crops, they aren't heavily refined, and they contain some trace vitamins and minerals.

You are right that not everyone can pay for local food all the time, it's such an injustice that we pay less for food that comes from the other side of the world.

I just came back from vacation in Germany and this is one of my favourite side dishes that I thought I would never be able to replicate at home — I can't wait to give it a try!

I selected meals from the Sun Basket menu for a busy week when I knew I wouldn't have much time to develop dinner on my own; this purple sweet potato recipe came as a dinner side dish.

The sides separated from the pan and they came out very easily and did not fall apart.

Anyway, we've got cabinet side panels to cut and install (and we just had a not - so - good call come in from the zoning department) so I'm going to leave you with some links and skedaddle.

The feasts also come with cornbread and a variety of sides from buttermilk waffles, cajun dirty rice, creamy slaw, mac n» cheese, and more.

Wenger is sitted on the bench noticing all that but come up with a solution to it, flamini keeps on making silly fouls but even when the referee is lenient wenger can't take him off... we lead a red carded side with an injured defender but wenger can't think of how to keep the lead instead he opts to replace AS17 who had a «leg» in both goals and bring in a non effective monreal who isn't good going forward neither is he good defending... i strongly believe had it been AS17 at the rebound of the shot from Carzola that would have been the winning goal.

We do nt mix it up when it comes to the tactical side of the game, a good example is we hardly if ever take shots from outside the box, so the opposition know that we like to «pass it in the net» teams do nt find it as difficult to defend against us anymore.

Its seems to me that both the club and it's fans are not serious.Anytime Arsenal sign a youngster from another team who is dubbed the next whatever people come out and say Arsenal have just signed a youngster who may or may not make it and that Arsene should sign ready made.They say it to seem as if it's a bad thing.Now that Chris Willock is leaving I'm anticipating that a lot of people are soon going to be blaming the same Wenger who actually likes bringing in youngsters.Anyway you have to look at the reasons he lfet.It's for game time and to him he thinks its a good choice.The bright side is that he's not Arsenal's most talented player.The likes of Donyell Malen, Yassin Fortune, Reiss Nelson in my eyes have more potential as wingers.I also think Arsenal should be very excited about Eddie Nketiah and Stephy Mavididi.They can be world class strikers in the future particularly Eddie.

From what I can see, the last real links with us signing the Turkish international came over six months ago, and he has not had the best season with Bayer Leverkusen statistically, but has been a key player in the side which finished third in the German top division, helping them to earn a Champions League place for next year.

With the recent record Arsenal have had with injuries and with Danny Welbeck already ruled out long term, this was not what Wenger and the Arsenal fans wanted to hear, but there are two sides to every story and I think there might be some long term positives to come from this latest blow.

A lot of goals haven't came from Chelsea's right side last season especially when Schurlle left and am sure he will be scoring a lot for them so I am not sure if that statement of him not being an upgrade is correct.