Sentences with phrase «not come to court»

In addition to explaining why the nature of the hearsay statement will not come to court, the circumstances of the interview, the proximity of the maker to the defendant, as well as how they know the defendant, are all important points which should be addressed in a presenting officer's statement.

[34] As I have noted in other cases, a party can not come to court with a deficient record, make submissions, listen to the court's comments as to how and why his evidence is inadequate and then seek to come back with better materials another day after having had the benefit of judicial feedback.

The loss is not just to the parties if a significant legal question lies there at the heart of a dispute that does not come to court; the law itself loses an opportunity to develop in a responsive and timely way to what is actually going on out in the real world.

The settlement — which is not an admission of wrongdoing — means the suit will not come to court.

«My client later told me that the first defendant said he was indisposed and would not come to court.

When they clerk offers to come pick you up, you reply that you want to go to class and you are not coming to court.

If the defendant doesn't come to court as ordered, the bondsman must pay the amount of money on the bail bond to the court.

@gatorback An analogous case just hasn't come to the court since.

There are some ways to better the odds of an officer not coming to court:

If you delay your appearance to a different day, it's possible the officer won't come to court for one case.

If you have been served, you must show up at court to protect your right to be heard; if you don't come to court, a default judgment may be taken against you.

Not exact matches

Rebelez says unlike other companies, IHOP hasn't even had to actively court these much sought after demographics: they just come.

«You don't want a situation in which courts are adjudicating intelligence that is coming to the executive when trying to formulate policy,» said Pressman.

«If we have a reason to question a sale, because we don't think it's an arm's length fair market value sale... we should have the right to come address that with the court,» he said.

Different administrators have come to different conclusions about how best to apply the law in view of the science, and many of their decisions have been challenged in court, sometimes successfully, for either going too far or not far enough.

According to media reports, IMG will need to find a new home for the event come September, after the Supreme Court of the State of New York Count ruled Lincoln Center can not renew its contract.

This could all add up to a 1990s - style implosion for states that don't have their own exchanges pending the Supreme Court's final decision come June.

There may not be much activity in the courtroom itself, as initial bids to buy the paper will come in by filings, not in open court.

Despite the fact that at least five of the judges involved in the two appeal court judgements were originally appointed to lower courts by Brian Mulroney's Conservative government, Harper insisted: «It was the government that decided to put the judges on the bench, the government that decided not to appeal, the government that decided to lose the case and the government that decided not to come back to Parliament.

The announcement came a day after Trump fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates, a holdover from the Obama administration, after she announced she had directed Justice Department attorneys not to defend the president's temporary travel ban on seven majority - Muslim countries in court.

These special Chapter 19 courts ensure the US doesn't have home field advantage when it comes to deciding whether their tariffs are fair.

I came closer than many by calling attention to the fact that the Court couldn't recommend effectively than the mandate be....

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

Judge Christopher Hehir said: «I am sorry justice was not done when you came to court in 1998 and 1999.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

«I do not like a prosecutor to come into court with overweening power, an excessive force, overwhelming influence or too much popularity.

How come testimony and doc - umentation is valid in our court systems today but not when we apply it to the biblical text?

The suit alleges that the law gives the Ugandans standing to sue Lively for his activities, which had a crucial nexus in the U.S. and therefore come under federal courts» jurisdiction; it also charges that Lively not only advocated bad ideas in an abstract context but helped various Ugandans conceive and manage a campaign of persecution, thus involving himself in a joint criminal enterprise.

He does not say so, but Mr. Harris seems to believe that the Court, left to itself, might come up with a stronger protection of religious freedom.

In 2014, when Obamacare came before the Supreme Court via the Hobby Lobby case, the court ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the contraceptive mandate on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female emploCourt via the Hobby Lobby case, the court ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the contraceptive mandate on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female emplocourt ruled 5 — 4 that employers who objected to the contraceptive mandate on religious grounds didn't have to offer birth control directly to female employees.

Similarly, if teachers employed by the public are assigned to teach on parochial school premises, they tend to come under the administrative aegis of the parochial rather than the public school (not that they teach religion, but that they otherwise function to some degree as adjunct faculty, increasing with tax funds the staffing resources of the parochial school — a consideration apparently underlying two 1985 decisions but not well articulated by the Supreme Court)

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

When it came time for the trial, all the judges of the Amherst County Circuit Court had to disqualify themselves because the commonwealth attorney, J. Barney Wyckoff, was not only a member of the church but one of the defendants.

The only thing not blank was the name of the institution to which the claimant must come to cash in his fundamental right — the Supreme Court of the United States.

we have to contend with them removing our prayer and worship from our schools, trying to remove it from our court rooms and money, but we do not have to put up with their intolerance when it comes to those lost in an unnecessary tragedy as 9/11.

The decision of the courts will come down to whether or not the teaching of the Bible is based on its «literary and historic qualities,» versus what the foundation referred to as «Bible indoctrination.»

Though Jesus had not, it is true, announced himself to Israel as the Messiah, and had forbidden the demons to make him known — since they knew him» — and had even commanded his disciples to be silent about their recognition of his Messiahship, nevertheless, at the last, in the high priest's court, he had admitted unequivocally that he was the one who should sit at the right hand of the divine Power (God) and come with the clouds of heaven.

Therefore, while we may expect it to become more and more a political issue, it is not yet the issue in most cases that come before courts.

Perhaps if the case went to court, all the sorted details will come out, and not only his wife, family, and the world, but the congregation, will get a nasty ear full, too.

That our culture and the Court have come to accept the moral liceity of both contraception and sodomy does not show that the «essence» of human sexuality and marriage have changed — indeed, what is essential to something can not change, belonging as it does to the nature of the thing — but that our prevailing sexual culture has grown ever more unnatural, irrational, immoral, and destructive of human flourishing.

That a lot of secular progressives are fierce supporters of the abortion license because they're eugenicists at heart shouldn't come as a surprise; one current member of the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, had a Gruberian moment some years ago when she admitted in an interview that legal activists promoting the abortion license prior to 1973 did so in part because they thought it would cut down the «growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of.»

A second blow to the revolving door system came in 1966 when the Federal Court of Appeals ruled, in effect, in the Driver and Easter cases, that public intoxication per se is not a crime.

He shouldn't «be saying anything like that because it's going to come up before the court.

After Frederick's excommunication at Lyons, the two older brothers of Thomas Aquinas, who had served in Frederick's court for decades, joined in a rebellion against Frederick at Parma that eventually failed, but not without coming close to success.

The court has not yet set a date to hear the case; it would come this fall at the earliest.

«I frankly don't know how I am going to come up with the rest of the money,» Thomson told Sun News Network's Brian Lilley on Byline.Canada's justice system has a knack for punishing people for defending themselves and their property, often called «castle law.MORE: Court drops final charge against Ontario man who fired shots to protect his home under attack by firebombers Joseph and Marilyn Singleton of Taber, Alberta spent $ 30,000 in cCourt drops final charge against Ontario man who fired shots to protect his home under attack by firebombers Joseph and Marilyn Singleton of Taber, Alberta spent $ 30,000 in courtcourt.

Yesterday a dream came true for me — I not only got to visit the Wimbledon tennis championships, but also had Centre Court tickets!

And with 10 of the 12 teams on the wrong side of the cut line set to take the court in the coming days, the Gaels won't be able to breathe easy for the remainder of the week.

«Every time I step on the court I know guys are coming at me and I don't want to ever have someone say they were better than me when stepping on the court.

Year after year they lay everything they possibly can out on the floor / court / turf / diamond etc. and when it comes time to play in the Playoffs they just haven't been able to get that signature W..