Sentences with phrase «not controversial»

Big decisions were not controversial or life - changing for the members.

«Birth control is not controversial — it's health care the vast majority of women will use in the course of their lifetime.

Include them under «interests» and make sure they are not controversial.

Include hobbies and personal interests if they're employment - related, not controversial, and show skills and experience.

It is not controversial to say that many of the most popular video games are violent; five of the top 10 selling games of 2017 were about shooting guns and three of them would be taxed under Nardolillo's proposed regulations.

While it's not controversial to argue that blockchains are potentially disruptive in legal and governmental terms (as Mersch also does), it's highly debatable as to whether speed and cheapness alone make TIPS «better» than the blockchain.

This principle is not controversial.

The legislation is quite technical, and much of it is not controversial, but a number of elements are extremely problematic.

This is not a controversial proposition given that, wherever there has been a loss, the principle of restitutio in integrum entitles the claimant to be placed in the position they would have been in had the tort not been committed.

It's not controversial, but it doesn't tell the whole story.

I believe that this can be demonstrated (it is not controversial to point out that the workplace productivity of those involved in litigation would be improved if their cases were concluded far earlier than at present).

But in most of those cases that proposition was not controversial.

This is not controversial.

In the first, the trial judge wrote in Ng v. Sarkaria, 2011 BCSC 1643 at para. 7: «The law regarding causation is not controversial, even though the application of the law to the facts is often difficult.»

The facts were not controversial.

Harvard Law Professor Charles Nesson's defense of alleged file - sharer Joel Tenenbaum against a lawsuit brought by the Recording Industry Association of America has been nothing if not controversial.

Some legal issues will not have gone through the courts; some because a dispute has not arisen, and some because the particular point of law is not controversial.

Thus my wondering what happens if you go back 400 years using the proxy reconstructions which, for that time frame, are not controversial and which have relatively tight error bounds.

So bouncing a laser off the moon or detecting weak orbital signal, is not controversial.

So evaporation, condensation, freezing and melting would moderate temperature gradients on earth somewhat compared to the moon So, lack of greenhouse effects on the earth would result in a colder surface than we see; that's not controversial.

The physical link between SST and precipitation for any individual hurricane is not controversial, it is routinely exploited in the hurricane forecast models used by the national hurricane center.

Among those who have actually studied the matter, the proposition that we are warming the planet is not controversial.

«In the scientific community, acid rain is not a controversial topic,» he says.

This is not a controversial point, serious IPCC advocates include this derivation as part of their narrative.

Sea ice is is not controversial nor is there a scientific conflict.

Temperature data is not controversial nor is there a scientific conflict.

Paleo climate is not controversial nor is there a scientific conflict.

It is not controversial that we do not know what the future climate will be.

Passage 4 — «Science doesn't know how bad the green - house effect is» is not a controversial statement either.

It is not controversial in the scientific community that «global warming does exist».

But while the reduce - recycle - cleanup framework is not controversial among supporters of the quest to end litter, this framework has surprisingly had its opponents in the climate change conversation.

This is not controversial: It's a reality we've understood for decades.

Similarly, it is probably not controversial to say that an international process will be necessary in the medium term if outdoors research approaches a scale where it might have transboundary impacts.

The point is not what has happened but what will happen, and it is not controversial to say that increased incidence and severity of heat waves will create more crop failures in direct proportion with their increased incidence and severity (climate change bulls will claim offsets to cold snaps at higher latitudes rather than debate this point).

The point remains, it's not a controversial observation.

Are you claiming these points are not controversial, which is what I said?

Climate change is not a controversial subject.

In fact, what they were reacting to was their own ignorance that the US record HAD been adjusted just as I stated — whether the adjustment is done, is not controversial in the field.

These facts are not controversial.

Of course, such data is not controversial.

Let's first assert that it is adiabatic (hopefully not controversial), as it rises it expands and does work on it's environemnt.

What you are talking about are Milankovich cycles and they are not controversial and reasonably well understood.

Whether their skills at hindcasting (most model efforts) or forecasting (Hansen) are «good» or «bad» is a matter of judgment, but it's not controversial that they should be improved.

Edim says: October 28, 2012 at 1:56 pm Considering there must be other, non-solar factors, the correlation between colder periods and periods of weak solar activity (minima) is significant and not controversial.

Considering there must be other, non-solar factors, the correlation between colder periods and periods of weak solar activity (minima) is significant and not controversial.

Spencer has shown, and this part is not controversial, that the presence of any radiative forcing decorrelates the flux response to temperature; more specifically any radiative forcing would make Dessler's 2010 zero - lag flux - temperature regression less useful than a bag of horse manure.

The net effect of a doubling of CO2 in teh absence of feedbacks is about 1.2 C — this has been discussed a great deal here and despite what some people claim is really not controversial.

Though the paper's findings are not controversial — few serious scientists dispute the evidence of the temperature datasets showing that there has been little if any global warming for nearly 19 years — they represent a tremendous blow to the climate alarmist «consensus», which has long sought to deny the «Pause's» existence.

This is not a controversial topic anymore — science, or at least the system of checking the science we are using, is failing us.

This is not controversial.