Sentences with phrase «not cover birth control»

That's why the only insurance plans in the US that do not cover birth control are offered by religious institutions that don't believe in it.

Actually, Obama's health care reforms make it illegal to not cover birth control pills or to charge women more for health insurance.

Catholic requirement to not cover birth control results in more expensive policies currently.

I worked for a hospital that did not cover birth control.

So BRC, are you saying that's discrimination against women that are made to buy this product without insurance, or just those with insurance but not covering birth control.

Not exact matches

On the other hand, 71 percent favor the law's Medicaid expansion, 66 percent of young adults favor the prohibition on denying people coverage because of a person's medical history, 65 percent favor requiring insurance plans to cover the full cost of birth control, 63 percent favor requiring most employers to pay a fine if they don't offer insurance and 53 percent favor paying for benefit increases with higher payroll taxes for higher earners.

A federal judge has rejected Massachusetts» challenge to new Trump administration rules that would allow more companies to not provide insurance plans that cover birth control; previous decisions by other judges in California and Pennsylvania went the other way, issuing injunctions against the new birth control rules.

I don't see any evidence that your belief that covering medications like birth control will bring us to our knees.

Work for a company so anti-choice they won't even allow insurance to cover birth control, so of course no procedure coverage because I «might change my mind» even though I'm married & will be 50 in a few months!!!

Catholic News Agency: Few Catholic colleges freely choose to cover birth control, group says An analysis by the Cardinal Newman Society shows that most Catholic colleges offering contraceptive coverage do so because of a state mandate or medical reasons but not for birth control purposes.

If birth control is covered it doesn't mean women have to use it if it's against their beliefs.

You mean being forced by her religion to cover her natural beauty, to be oppressed; to not be allowed birth control; to be forced to take part, at a very young age, in female circumcision; to risk being stoned to death for disobeying her husband; to be forced to marry a man she doesn't love.

And in the case of this story, if the RCC hadn't spent the last several decades inst.itutionalizing se.xual abuse and conspiring to cover it up and protect the offenders, or alienating folks with their stance on reproductive rights and birth control which is decidedly misogynistic and has contributed to the spread of HIV and other STDs, or if agents of the Church hadn't kidnapped and effectively sold thousands of Spanish, Irish, Australian and American children from the 1940s to as recently as 1987 — then folks wouldn't be leaving the Church in droves and you wouldn't be seeing stories like this one either.

Catholics don't believe in «artificial» birth control, Jehovah's Witnesses don't believe in blood transfusions, faith healers don't believe in any medical procedures at all... I don't want ANY of those religions to determine what my healthcare covers.

We will get over it when you stop using your religion to legislate who people can marry, insisting on teaching your mythology into a science classroom, covering up crimes against children, allow birth control in countries that can't feed themselves in the first place... need more?

Why should Viagra be covered, but birth control not?

I didn't understand it either until I talked to someone who is adamant that no insurance company, employer, etc, cover birth control.

This birth control pill is drawing so much debate and controversy on whether insurance have to cover it or not.

Birth control is a quality of life drug and shouldn't be required to be covered.»

In all this health care discussion, another fact has been forgotten: many Catholic schools have been offering insurance that covered birth control for many years in a number of states, including New York where despite the recent brouhaha, not a peep was heard about this until now.

While federal funds can not be used for abortions, Planned Parenthood reports that half of its patients use Medicaid to cover other services like birth control.

And for all the talk about birth control pills NOT being covered, I have never in real life run into an insured patient where they were nNOT being covered, I have never in real life run into an insured patient where they were notnot.

I was still able to get the pills covered having a condition that can be treated by birth control, but it was still more trouble than it should have been and was still a rule that simply should not have been there.

I was not covered for birth control pills under BCBS Concordia Health Plan.

The insurance company should have been able to pay for it since my children had latch problems... but if birth control isn't regularly covered how the hell are we going to get pumps and formula covered?

Federal officials under Obama have declared that insurers couldn't pick and choose; they had to cover all 18 FDA - approved methods of birth control.

«We found not all of the plans were covering every single method of birth control,» says Alina Salganicoff, Kaiser Family Foundation vice president and director of women's health policy.

Of course, Republicans have not presented a replacement plan for Obamacare, so it is impossible to say if birth control will continue to be covered.

i said and decided to go back to birth control pills, i was really tired of spending lots of money at this private clinic (i'm from Russia, health insurance doesn't cover it, blood tests are very expensive) so i was on birth control for about 1,5 years and didn't care much about it all, i was working out, eating about 100 - 150 carbs a day, very low fat, and always in caloric restriction, 1300kkal maybe..

Posts here cover everything from finding a like - minded partner, dating someone who isn't vegan or eco-conscious, natural birth control and sexual protection options, family planning, etc..

The NPRM would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information without individual authorization to: (1) A public health authority authorized by law to collect or receive such information for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability, including, but not limited to, the reporting of disease, injury, vital events such as birth or death, and the conduct of public health surveillance, public health investigations, and public health interventions; (2) a public health authority or other appropriate authority authorized by law to receive reports of child abuse or neglect; (3) a person or entity other than a governmental authority that could demonstrate or demonstrated that it was acting to comply with requirements or direction of a public health authority; or (4) a person who may have been exposed to a communicable disease or may otherwise be at risk of contracting or spreading a disease or condition and was authorized by law to be notified as necessary in the conduct of a public health intervention or investigation.

Contraception / birth control were not covered, except on many employer - sponsored policies.

And when I took a deeper look at the things not covered, such as mental health, eye exams, birth control, and accidents and injuries associated with «risky behaviors,» such as cancer that could be related to smoking, or car accidents possibly due to reckless driving, I realized that it was not a good fit for me.

Members of such ministries share the expenses of medical bills, but because they are often based on religion, they may not cover services they consider unethical like birth control.

For example, it might not cover maternity care or birth control.

OPT insurance would not cover pre-existing conditions, wellness checkups, maternity or birth control.

But some plans will require cost - sharing for certain brands, so check with the insurer to be sure the birth control you need is covered for free, and if not, find out how much it will cost.

In Little Sisters of the Poor v. Burwell, Gorsuch joined a dissent that argued that the requirement that employers who did not agree with birth control would not have to pay for insurance coverage that would cover birth control should not also be forced them to fill out a form to opt out of the payment.

For example, your insurance plan may cover birth control and STD testing, but not abortion services.

Unfortunately, my insurance did not cover the IUD, and this was before the Affordable Care Act, with its no copay birth control benefit, was in place.

Employers may choose to make accommodations for their employees so they can still be covered for birth control, but they are not required to do so.