Sentences with phrase «not deliver the judgment»

The Hon. Judge then proceeded on National assignment as an Election Petition Tribunal member and did not deliver the judgment even after his return in November, 2015, when he transferred the case file to the Chief Judge for it to start de-novo.

Not exact matches

Jesus gave us a clear picture of what that was all about as did others say Peter for example 2 Peter 2:4 - 6: For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved to judgment; 5And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; 6And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample to those that after should live ungodly;

Again, even when it comes to laws that are manifestly unjust, St. Thomas argues flatly that «judgment should not be delivered according to them.»

If it is NOT the rapture, but refers to judgment, then one is left (spared, delivered, saved) from being taken in judgment.

For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked (for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds) then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority.

If a judge pronounce a judgment, render a decision, deliver a sealed verdict, and afterward reverse his judgment, they shall prosecute the judge for reversing the judgment which he has pronounced, and he shall pay twelve fold the damages which were (awarded) in said judgment; and publicly they shall expel him from his seat of judgment and he shall not return, and with the judges in a case he shall not take his seat.21

I was not implying or saying that I can rescue the church the way Jesus has rescued and delivered us from sin and judgment.

At the weekend, it was discovered that most of them had gone back to their businesses and were not in Anambra State when the Supreme Court delivered the judgment.

This power of exposure is a far more effective deterrent in many countries, including our own, than the court systems that deliver judgment and not necessarily justice.

Each of the arms of government can check each other but not in the way of the President or any other person saying after a court of law has delivered a judgment and set free an accused person on bail, after looking at the various factor for the grant of bail, including severity of the punishment, including the weight of the alleged crime, including whether the accused person would jump bail or not, including whether you would produce surety or not, including whether he has health challenges or not, and the court has finally weighed all these and decided that the accused person must go on bail upon fulfillment of certain condition of bail.

Justice Morenike Obadina, while delivering judgment, held that Ayida filed an answer to the petition but did not give oral evidence in support of it.

Delivering unanimous judgment on the appeal, Justice Nasiru, said he decided to take great caution not to go out of bound since the tribunal was yet to deliver judgment on the main petition.

But Justice Gabriel Kolawole, in his judgment, delivered on July 1, 2015, held that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit while the June 8, 2015 judgment of the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another judge of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been set aside by any appellate court.

Justice Archibong (now retired) had in a judgment delivered on April 2, 2012 struck out the 26 counts contained in a charge numbered FHC / L / 443C / 2013 filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission against Akingbola on the grounds that the prosecution was not diligent in the handling of the case.

«I'm not going to speak on the expected judgment until after it must have been delivered.

He said that notwithstanding that «the motion for stay of execution of the judgment of the Honourable Justice Nnamdi Dimgba (of the Federal High Court in Abuja) delivered last week in the case of Senator Ovie Omo - Agege v The Senate has not been heard and determined by the Federal High Court, the Senate resolved yesterday to comply with the terms of the judgment».

The Justices in delivering their judgment, also indicated that their order should not take retrospective effect, but should be implemented in six months, when admissions for the 2018 academic year begin.

Because Justice Salami refused (to disband the tribunal), Katsina - Alu arrested the delivery of the tribunal's judgment; that judgment has not been delivered to date and on the basis of that, Salami was suspended from office.

Whilst it can not be said that this would never be an appropriate course for the case tribunal to take it, in my judgment, where the matter complained of was, by inference, put before the electorate as an issue and they have delivered their verdict through the ballot box it can not be right to override that verdict.»

N V UK On 27 May 2008, the Grand Chamber delivered its long awaited judgment in the case of N v UK (App No 36565 / 05)[2008] All ER (D) 05 (Jun).

Delivering judgment along with Mr Justice Holgate, Lord Justice Singh said Part 4 was incompatible with fundamental rights in EU law because «access to retained data is not limited to the purpose of combating «serious crime»» and «access to retained data is not subject to prior review by a court or an independent administrative body».

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will not make a judgment as to the quality of the advice given but will punish Solicitors if the way in which the advice was delivered or the manner in which complaints were handled falls short of the required standard.

In sum, the CJEU holds that the General Court erred in law in finding that the aid's compatibility should have been assessed under Regulation (EEC) 1191/69 for what concerned the payments made after 3 December 2009, and referred back the dispute for assessment of the two pleas which were not analysed at the time the judgment was delivered.

It is not the result of the case as such which has attracted attention but rather the comments of Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court, who delivered a concurring judgment.

It was common ground that, in terms of the judgments regulation, Art 5 (1)(b) the English courts did not have jurisdiction unless, according to English law, the cider was «delivered» in England, in particular on shipment at Liverpool.

I have not attempted a statistical analysis to establish the average time that the Court has taken to deliver judgments after the completion of hearings.

The minority judgment of Elias CJ and McGrath J (delivered by the latter) dissented from this approach but all the judges were of the view that on the facts the appellant had not made out its case.

In a major setback for the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Court of Appeal this week delivered a landmark judgment that Art 2 (right to life) applied to British forces overseas, whether or not they are physically on an armed forces base.

Delivering judgment, Lord Neuberger said: «It seems to me that there is no inherent reason why a right to... make a noise which would otherwise be a nuisance, should not be established by prescription.»

In a judgment delivered today the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that homo - and bisexual persons are eligible groups for claiming asylum in EU and they can not be requested to conceal their sexual orientation (X, Y, Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel).

However, in the British legal context the spelling «judgment» is the conventional one and is used almost exclusively; thus the UK Supreme Court delivers judgments, not judgements.

The courts of the Member State of enforcement may make practical arrangements for organising the exercise of rights of access, if the necessary arrangements have not or have not sufficiently been made in the judgment delivered by the courts of the Member State having jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter and provided the essential elements of this judgment are respected.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lord Toulson said: «It seems instinctively unjust for a person to suffer injury as a result of the malicious prosecution of legal proceedings for which there is no reasonable ground, and yet not be entitled to compensation for the injury intentionally caused by the person responsible for instigating it» (at [43]-RRB-.

The justices reserved judgment after two days of proceedings and are not expected to deliver a ruling for several months.

Lord Chief Justice Morgan, delivering his judgment, said: «Anyone who applies a religious aspect or a political aspect to the provision of services may be caught by equality legislation, not because the legislation treats their religious belief or political opinion less favourably but because that person seeks to distinguish, on a basis that is prohibited, between those who will receive that service and those who will not.»

Last week, Ontario's Superior Court of Justice delivered a much noticed judgment rejecting Toronto's claims that Uber could not operate there without registering and obtaining a license as a taxicab or limousine broker.

I do not think it is fanciful to describe a judicial career in terms of the major judgments delivered.

Delivering judgment in Southall v General Medical Council [2009] EWHC 1155 (Admin), Mr Justice Blake said: «Dr Southall's conduct was not a mere error of judgment in a challenging environment where there may have been few established principles for guidance.

Delivering the main judgment, Lady Justice Sharp held, first, that the trial judge did not err when determining the meaning of the word «strangle» in the comments.

Lord Justice Chadwick, delivering the leading judgment, held that the plural reference to brothers could not properly be construed as a reference to one brother.

Delivering judgment, Lang J said «the Council did not conduct the rigorous analysis and consideration required in order to satisfy the «due regard» duty under s 49A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, principally because it did not gather the information required to do so properly».

Delivering her judgment in the case, Lady Justice Arden said: «Client money is not money only to be found in segregated accounts.

However, I then explored a Chief Justice factor in judgment assignment, on the not unlikely hypothesis that for institutional reasons Chief Justices deliver more than their notional one - ninth share of judgments, especially for the more important decisions.

Delivering judgment in Bazzouni v the Prime Minister [2011] EWHC 2401 (Admin), Sir Anthony May said: «We are not persuaded that the officer is properly able to judge whether hooding by members of the foreign liaison service will not pose a risk to [the prisoner's] physical or mental health, unless the hooding is consensual.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lord Justice Hickinbottom said «there does not appear to be a logical reason why London boroughs should be deprived of the powers which non-London local authorities have in respect of entertainment in parks under s 145.

Lords Mance and Reed each delivered six single judgments, while Lord Clarke was the only Justice not to issue any.

Delivering judgment, Lord Sumption said the bank received no notice of the listing: «The duty to give advance notice and an opportunity to be heard to a person against whom a draconian statutory power is to be exercised is one of the oldest principles of what would not be called public law.»

Delivering judgment, Lord Chief Justice Sir Brian Kerr said: «Although I consider it likely that a properly directed jury would conclude that a sufficient factual substratum existed for the comment... I can not be certain that this is so and I would therefore order a retrial.»