Sentences with phrase «not diety»

If you believe in a deity (not diety, which has something to do with eating), he / she should have no problem existing beyond the constraints of time, and «Having 10 billion years to plan the reveal between the Big Bang and the earliest humans» would mean the same as an instant.

The Pope is just a man and not a diety.

Not exact matches

As for the «evangelicals» who hitched their wagon to the blasphemous Romney thinking that Jesus would have voted for someone who openly denies His Diety and sovereignty, and who hijacked the discussion of faith in this country to hide their actual agendas of hate, racism, division, and greed, the election result is another lesson to them to not drag Holy God down into the vile realm of man's political systems.

The point isn't to argue the merits of your unprovable diety, but whether our children should be confused into thinking creationism is science.

You sound psychotic... dude be happy you and your family got to live long lives and stop opperssing yourself... how do you not go crazy laying awake in bed thinking you have wasted even a minute of your precious life giving it to some false diety?

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

I FULLY believe in a creator and spiritual reality, but I think the GREAT creator, not the various imposters (Including the dieties of JEws, Muslims and Christians) who have fun watching us kill each other over theological syntax disagreements, has MUCH better things to do than have personal conversations with any of us, dumb blondes included.

Honestly, the * last * thing I want to be doing when I'm experiencing what will be the last waking, conscious moments of life, is being worried that I didn't worship some imagined diety enough to buy me a ticket to some la - la land in the clouds.

* facepalm * - I can't deny that many athiests know much about diety and christianity.

Athiests profess that they do not believe in a diety or the afterlife, which by extension implies that their existence ends with their death — the time you have on earth is all the time you get.

If she did not believe in the existence of a diety, she was an atheist.

If we had been left without dieties we would have never progressed past our base animal instincts and our world would not be what it is now.

** We don't have to prove that your diety does not exist.

I'm not hindo and I do nt give much to dieties in general but maybe its significant for data collection purposes.

(I've read that idea before — that the children died as a result of conflict between the various dieties — but don't remember where.)

I quite seriously disagree with your assessment that belief in a diety has not changed anything.

I'm far from the point of saying that the Egyptian dieties killed the first - born, but that is not out of the question.

Why do you not take 100 % responsibility for everything that happens to you instead of blaming your misfortune on a diety or devil?

You would think if they had any «faith» in an all powerful diety who knows them and cares about them and protects them they would not need all those assault weapons «just in case»...

If we're given «choices» to allow ourselves to determine the outcome the diety wouldn't get involved.

As we have seen, it did this, not by encouraging surrender to an external diety, but by resolving inner conflict, thus releasing God - given resources within the personality.

I don't mind dieties, I like them all.

Its unfortunate, that they have to be tied to some form of invisible diety that doesn't exist.

The simple act of dying and coming back is not enough to make someone a diety.

Does that mean that just because a person is born to a certain society where christianity is not the norm, where they are raised to praise another god or diety, then they will be be doomed to spend an eternity in your hell?

But just because we don't know how it happend doesn't mean that we can just attribute it to a diety.

Maybe a diety we haven't discovered yet!

I'm not trying to appease a diety.

The difference here of course has nothing to do with trustung what «men» have written, it has to do with faith in whatever diety you believe... If you accept that there is a diety responsible for inspiring someone to write about them then really it is not the person writing but the diety writing through them... so your argument from that perspective is moot...

Bippy has become the Lesser Squirrel - Zombie of Resurrecting Dieties and Not Paying Your Debts!

Yes, spread the good news that if you do nt believe in a ficti tious diety that you will burn for all eternity!

If you do not believe in any dieties there should be a group for that.

An invisible diety being constantly referred to, or prayed to, that does not exist.

Religious insti.tutions make grandiose and false claimes about historical events or «miracles» that aren't miracles at all, science has been able to wrap each one up as false, hoax or true but because of natural laws that have no need of a diety.

The wandering preacher would not only attract attention to his or her gifts as a performer, but also to the diety that she or he represented.

I'm not claiming a all powerful diety exists, you are.

They often take away the diety of Our Lord by placing more emphasis on so called human fallible «saints» and «pray» to humans such as Mary who did not remain virgin once she gave birth to Christ and had more children.

Your false diety will not bless an admitted boy toucher.

even if they believe in a diety they may or may not believe in satan.

I was simply pointing out that we do understand what holds the earth in orbit, and that it is not the hand of some diety.

But most people that don't believe in a diety are never threatened by those that believe... usually we just watch with aww and fascination of how someone can believe such things with no supporting data.

You do not need any diety to establish a legal code, Hammurabi did this almost 4000 years ago, and he didin't need your «god» to do it.

To those reading - we must be careful not to take away the diety of Christ.

We don't need to have been pre-programmed by some diety.

Science may not have been able to prove that the universe can start on its own with a superpowerful diety pushing the button, however that doesn't imply that that is the case, nor does it imply that it would happen to be the same diety mentioned in the bible.

Muslims do not accept his diety, or resurection, and since the Bible was written earlier and there are so many parts from the Bible taken and entered into the quran...?!! Since the Bible was written, and the red words are of Jesus and Jesus says «I AM», and Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet, and prophets can't lie... bottom line..

not believe in any diety.

Same as the Jewish diety, but don't tell anyone.

Just because you call your diety something different, it doesn't mean a thing.

Yet some either deny a concept of God based on a human like diety... without logically understanding it has to be something more than that... or worse only see a chaotic uncaring universe..., without understanding the complexity of the infinite miracles, defined by science alone, not to mention the influence of noy yet known to science, occurences... that have occurred for billions of years to end up in their creation and also supporting their every day survival.