Sentences with phrase «not discipline your child»

(followed closely by: - «I have a personal relationship» with «God / Jesus» and - «If you are a good parent, don't you discipline your children when they misbehave?»

If a child is caught and disciplined for drug or alcohol use by authority figures outside of the league (parents, law enforcement, school faculty, etc.) in an environment not related to the league, then the league should not discipline the child.

Do not discipline your child when you are angry and unable to control your emotions.

Other times, the child's father may feel his wife should not discipline his child which can also encourage resentment.

Then we went through a phase instead of extended families, nuclear families became the «ideal», and parents demanded that other people NOT discipline their children.

No, your home visitor will not discipline your child.

Not exact matches

Each was not afraid to question conventional wisdom, to remain open - minded, to adopt a child - like curiosity, to work hard, to seek wisdom from other disciplines, to learn from others, to challenge ideas and to be willing to admit and learn from mistakes.

It's discipline and determination that will drive you to work when you're tired, when there's a sports game on, when your child wants to play and when the business isn't succeeding.

I'm beginning to see what it looks like to come as a child to my Heavenly Father, heeding the wisdom of Solomon, «My son, do not despise the Lord's discipline, and do not resent his rebuke, because the Lord disciplines those he loves, as a father the son he delights in.»

My parents were not spankers, and yet we were very well disciplined children (for the most part...).

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

Many parents believe that they will just be able to reason with their children when they are older, so discipline now is not needed.

Barbara Pitkin writes that «Calvin himself appears not to have advocated the use of physical force in response to sin in children; though he recognized the need for parental discipline, his explicit remedies were baptism and education (albeit strict and structural) into faith and morality.»

The volume includes two additional studies on theologians who, although they hold quite pessimistic views on the nature of children, do not endorse physical discipline: the Reformer John Calvin and the 18th - century American Calvinist Jonathan Edwards.

In this most elementary area of parent - child relationships, such a notion rescues discipline from connotations of punishment and has the further virtue of counseling foresight, according to which the best disciplining parent is the one who anticipates that from which the child alone can not protect himself and does something about it before the child is injured.

In the process of my slow reconciliation to the term I have been especially aided by experts in child study, who have been redefining discipline as protection of the child from that from which he is not yet ready to protect himself.

Proverbs 23:13 - 15 ESV Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you strike him with a rod, he will not die.

The internalizing child may be overlooked because he is not a discipline problem.

Even the relationship of teacher and pupils in a school is not fulfilled so long as the instructor by duress and discipline is forcing stolid children to their work.

Calvin stops short of justifying wife - and child - beating in the name of patriarchal duty and discipline, but his message is clear: the Christian duty of a battered wife is not to oppose violence and violation but to endure it and, further, to please her batterer husband.

Whoever spares the rod (discipline, not physical) hates their children, but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them.

As Bede said, «a child does not contradict the professors».5 The discipline was strict.

Do we not do the same when we are disciplined by our parents as children or by our employer when we call ourselves adults, don't we want to «get our own back» don't we relish it when they become ill or have an accident and we say «it serves them right» justice has been done.

Parents are urged to develop an atmosphere of mutual respect; to communicate on levels of fun and recreation as well as on discipline and advice; to allow a child to learn «through natural consequences» — that is, by experiencing what happens when he dawdles in the morning and is permitted to experience the unpleasantness and embarrassment of being late to school; to encourage the child and spend time with him playing and learning (positively) rather than spending time lecturing and disciplining (negatively), since the child who is misbehaving is often merely craving attention and if he gets it in pleasant, constructive ways, he will not demand it in antisocial ways; to avoid trying to put the child in a mold of what the parent thinks he should do and be, or what other people think he should do and be, rather than what his natural gifts and tendencies indicate; to take time to train the child in basic skills — to bake a cake, pound a nail, sketch or write or play a melody — including those things the parents know and do well and are interested in.

You seem like someone who is interested in these kind of word studies so maybe you know if this is accurate or not: Someone else pointed out to me that the word for «punishment» in the sheep / goat passage is a Greek word that has more of a correction / discipline / child - training / restorative / purifying focus than «punishment» does in English.

Just like any sport or action, people can turn it into something that is not God - pleasing; however, the sport, with the rules that support it and are designed to prevent injury, is fantastic and a great way for children to develop self - discipline.

But even if we agree that a father may discipline a child... in a healthy relationship this does not represent boundaries, it represents... love.

But irritating as it may be for small children to be waving a sharpened stick around our ankles (and requiring as it does firm discipline), the stick doesn't threaten our eyes.

Sabi God is not surprised by our actions disappointed maybe just like in a family when the fathers children do the wrong thing.The amazing thing with God is that is sovereign and all the mistakes we make he uses them to build up our faith or if we refuse to listen he will discipline us for our good.

Is a parent a monster for having a child when the parent knows that the child will not be perfect and will have to be taught and disciplined (perhaps with the violence of a spanking).

If good parents are not evil for deliberately bringing children into this world and inevitably having to discipline them in some fashion or another then neither is God (who is better than any earthly parent could ever be) for creating man.

I agree discipline is needed to teach Children from whats wrong and right if not they most likely qill go astray but when the lesson is learned Jesus will dwell in our hearts and the Holy Spirit will confront are own spirit we are christians childreChildren from whats wrong and right if not they most likely qill go astray but when the lesson is learned Jesus will dwell in our hearts and the Holy Spirit will confront are own spirit we are christians childrenchildren of Fos

So then the child does not follow through and the parent smacks him with a belt or a cane lightly — for discipline purposes to teach the child a lesson.

I am (a) A victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make factual assertions when supported by considerable evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.

According to the Didascalia, he should be at least fifty years of age at his election, not necessarily educated, married not more than once with children whose discipline should testify to his competence He

I just wanted to point out that many parents spank, not because they can not control their temper, but because they have thoughtfully decided that it is an effective way to discipline their children.

In the same way that we do not expect a first grader to learn calculus, it is important to understand what age appropriate behaviour is and to shape your expectations of your child and your discipline (teaching) according to what a child can reasonably be expected to understand at any given age.

There are other ways to discipline children — they just may not be as easy as spanking.

I believe in disciplining children, not punishing.»

Our children are messed up because we don't do good enough discipline and let them get away with anything.

Instead of standing up to the children, but seeing as this isn't about discipline, let me move on / I have 7 month old child, and I let her cry sometimes, mainly because she likes being held ALL the time.

There are some things where I don't have quite as much confidence - gentle discipline, for instance, because of less support for it in person and the fact that it has so many variables (working w / a child's behavior has much more grey area than «I always comfort my baby when she wakes up in the night,» which makes it more of a challenge)- so somethimes I do feel judged for my discipline choices, and sometimes I don't live up to my own standards - making me more suseptable (sp?)

An example might be in the area of positive discipline for applicants who have infants and have not yet had the opportunity to practice positive discipline with their own children.

I am a fairly strict parent and this has been remarked upon several times by people who are decidedly not AP — but I teach through gentle discipline and I meet what I believe to be the needs of my children at their stages of development.

The topics they covered ranged from PPD (postpartum depression) to discipline issues to bonding with your child to whether or not to let a baby CIO (cry it out) to SIDS to boosting children's immune systems to colic and more.

And it's pretty hard not to form a strong connection and get to know your child really well when you do breastfeed, spend lots of time with them, wear or carry them everywhere you go, are available to them all night, use positive discipline and practice the other principles of attachment parenting.

Iben Sandahl, a licensed narrative psychotherapist, MPF, and author of the acclaimed parenting book, The Danish Way, told Mother magazine that children who are raised by parents who do not employ an ultimatum - based system of discipline are much more inclined to both value and exhibit respect as opposed to fear or apathy.

If you are overwhelmed by the gentle discipline aspect of attachment parenting, then you might not be setting enough limits with your child.

Disciplining your child doesn't mean punishing him; it means teaching him right from wrong.

If your child's aggression is serious, or it isn't responding to discipline, talk to your pediatrician.