Sentences with phrase «not discuss the case»

Citing a respect for the judicial process during an ongoing legal proceeding, Cuomo would not discuss the case.

«On the advice of my counsel, I can not discuss the case or allegations against me as long as there are outstanding charges,» she said.

Kristy Mazurek, a former TV reporter best known locally as treasurer of the WNY Progressive Caucus, the political committee at the heart of AG Eric Schneiderman's grand jury probe in Buffalo, is running for the Assembly and cooperating with investigators, but won't discuss the case.

Though Albany is reeling from yet another corruption scandal, the ethics and lobbying regulators at the Joint Commission on Public Ethics didn't discuss the case at their meeting.

«As in practice, I do not discuss cases with judges or persons in authority.

Westchester County Probation Assistant Commissioner Ed Barella told Talk of the Sound that Martinez» terms of probation were confidential and he would not discuss the case beyond saying that Martinez had been transferred to Brooklyn and was no longer the responsibility of the Westchester County Probation Department.

It also means that the mediators will not discuss the case outside of the mediation context — with friends, neighbors, strangers, attorneys, therapists, court staff, etc. without your permission.

Even though insurance companies often make settlement offers, it is strongly advised that you do not discuss your case with an insurance investigator or take settlement offers without first discussing your case with a personal injury attorney from Jacoby & Jacoby.

Do not discuss this case with anyone, even your spouse or a friend, either in person or by any other means [including by phone, text message, email message, chat room, blog, or social networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter, or Myspace].

After you retire to deliberate, you may begin discussing the case with your fellow jurors, but you can not discuss the case with anyone else until you have returned a verdict and the case is at an end.

Until you retire to deliberate, you may not discuss this case with anyone, even your fellow jurors.

Not surprisingly, the very first comment his post received was from someone who perhaps remembered Flea's fate: «I know you feel the need to vent but for your own sake, stop here and do not discuss this case in public.»

• Do not discuss the case or compare notes with potential witnesses.

Do not discuss the case with anyone except your lawyer.

Even though an insurance company may make a quick settlement offer, you should not discuss your case with an insurance investigator or take any settlement offers prior to seeking counsel from F. Anthony Koushan.

Do not discuss your case with anyone but your attorney.

Jurors should not discuss the case with any person other than members of the jury.

Be Careful Who You Talk To - It's best if you don't discuss your case with anyone other than your doctors and your attorneys.

(I should note that I have worked for Justice Duval Hesler, as she then was, back when I was in law school, and have kept in touch with her; while I generally think the world of her and am, no doubt, biased, I have not discussed this case with her.)

The lenders will not discuss the case, but they argue in court documents that their need to protect their investment overrides the landlord's objection to insurance cost.

Not exact matches

These «napkin» talks where my future was discussed were sketched on a scratch sheet of paper or literally a napkin in some cases, not a power point presentation.

Passively listening to a lecture or even discussing a case study about someone else doesn't provoke the anxiety, fear, exhilaration, and every other emotion that performing does.

In some cases, the top of the proverbial food chain at the tropical sweat shop where some companies quarter their customer service reps is an often imaginary supervisor who apparently doesn't do anything except spend all of his or her in meetings with God knows who, discussing God knows what.

«Trump came in opposing better relations with Cuba,» said one national security official who, like others, would discuss the case only on the condition he not be named.

Wagner: The Intel case provides a lot to think about, and the issues are not limited to those we've discussed.

'' Mr. Oundo [Living Goods Field Supervisor] discussed one case in which a woman's young child had diarrhea and the child's condition was deteriorating, but the mother could not seek treatment because she did not have money to travel and her husband was out of town.

«We can not discuss the details of the case, but we do believe he will be cleared of all allegations of any wrongdoing,» BTU President Anna Fusco said.

Note that the estimate does not take into account any other potential benefits of the program, such as improved health in non-fatal cases or economic benefits from the purchase of money - saving durables such as solar lights, more efficient cook stoves, or water filters (discussed above).

This is even more accentuated by the fact that in a number of US states, there is no recourse for the lender to other assets of the borrower in the event of default (this is not the case in Australia, as discussed below).

The other is the Windsor case — discussed by Carl Scott earlier — in which the majority opinion not only sets aside part of the Defense of Marriage Act passed with overwhelming support in 1996, but also dismisses and disparages the motives of those who voted for it.

And if people can comment publicly on the Mars Hill or Duggar case, and call out problems with how the church community handled it, then why not discuss the concern over how Julie's been «handled» by the EV group?

Do not make hasty generalizations and insult people claiming they don't know what they are talking about when in fact the statement they have made is applicable to the vast majority of the cases which they are discussing.

Such is especially the case in theology, where, if we wish to discuss who God is, we can only discuss who he is not — a most unsatisfactory basis for personal love!

But in the case of a literal three days and three nights, we are not discussing how many hours there is in a 24 hour day, or partial days.

(It is not a word I use every day but learned on the radio when CBC was discussing the BC Bountiful case re: poligamy and polyamorous «families».

If, therefore, we discuss future human structures and institutions of the Church which would make possible a more active participation of the laity in the decisions of ecclesiastical authorities, such efforts should not be discredited in advance by saying that they would remain in any case subject to the good pleasure of the hierarchy.

It is not surprising that it should be the post-Bultmannian, Dorothee Sölle, who develops the case for a political hermeneutic most clearly, since it has been the Bultmannians who have discussed the topic most fully.

And it should at once be noted also that as long as such a Church law is in existence, the character of its obligation, the possibility of being excused or dispensed from it, the possibility of discussing its expediency or the need to change it, the possibility of knowing oneself not bound by it in a particular concrete case etc., are of quite a different kind from any case in which an immutable divine commandment is involved.

She discusses theology intelligently, stating the case for obedience even more strongly than did God: «From the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, God said, «You shall not eat from it and you shall not touch it, lest you die.

Why is the future quality of life not discussed in the case of abortion??

Well, on the single word, but based on what was discussed earlier it is clear that such statement is at least not always true — especially in the case of implicit atheism.

He posits «that supernatural explanations, while not suitable in every case, should be welcome on the scholarly table along with other explanations often discussed,» for «antisupernaturalism has reigned as an inflexible Western academic premise long enough.»

So, go ahead and say something is or isn't true and discuss why you believe that to be the case, I'll do the same.

I'm sure many people would consider themselves pacifists but say that this is too extreme a definition, one might say for example that pacifism means «attempting to promote peace and making it a goal, but accepting that war is necessary in some cases to prevent greater evils,» however the way violence vs. following Jesus is being discussed in this context doesn't allow such concessions.

In a work recently completed, but not yet published, I have explained how the adaptability of animal bodily systems, especially the brain, which Meredith and Stein have remarkably demonstrated in respect of the senses in their The Merging of the Senses and which is seen in infant language - learning in a way discussed by Meltzoff, Butterworth and others, reaches a peak in the case of the human use of language so that it is solely semantic and communicational constraints which determine grammar and nothing universal in grammar is determined by neurology.

** In discussing abortion I will not address instances where most people, however they might ultimately decide the issue, would feel genuine moral anguish, cases, for example, where it is known that the child will be born with severe deformities.

Mike joins the team in discussing whether you should «fake it til you make it», how to forgive yourself of money mistakes, and they take on a couple's court case that you won't want to miss!

The whole burden of Whitehead's case must fall on the fact of inheritance, for as he himself fully recognized in discussing the cell, commonness of character is not the distinctive mark of life.

We talk about why kids shouldn't be the center of your life, discuss the importance of a regular date night, hear a tense couple's court case, find out how to make a family mission statement and a lot more!

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz