Sentences with phrase «not discussed any follow»

Not exact matches

This follows the far more severe (and widely discussed) move by another insurer, Anthem, to deny claims (in certain states) for emergency room care that are later deemed not to be emergencies.

«One of the uses being discussed is how drones can be used to follow vehicles of interest so a police car doesn't have to get into a high - speed chase.»

Still, the Windy City isn't trying to follow in the footsteps of its Western brother, Silicon Valley, as Pritzker Group founder J.B. Pritzker discussed with Tullman at Inc. and CNBC's iCONIC conference last May.

Two years later, after losing nearly 100 pounds, I even wound up on The Dr. Oz Show, alongside Dr. Fuhrman, where I discussed why Eat to Live, the eating plan I largely followed when I wasn't juice fasting, was (and remains) a key element to my health.

In an interview with Bloomberg TV today following the company's strong earnings report, Rorsted said board members have not discussed the possibility of cutting ties with West — who spearheads a collaboration with the athletic giant through his Yeezy sneaker line.

By the way I believe in May other reasons why bitcoin is not and is unlikely to be money — many of which have been discussed in the blogosphere — but this to me is arthmetic — as night follows day.

Ethereum's creator Vitalik Buterin and other developers have discussed eventually moving to a proof - of - stake model, in which users lock ether up in special wallets and risk losing these «stakes» if they don't follow the consensus rules.

According to Brandwatch, 96 % of people that discuss brands online do not follow those brands» official channels.

What is bothering me is the following: As I said before, this area is very competitive and Syngenta is a liquid stock (50 - 100 mn CHF a day) and I do not have any special insights into the situation.As discussed before, I guess I have even an information disadvantage.

I want it to be a place where we can tell our stories, confess our sins, discuss Scripture, ask questions, disagree with grace, grieve, heal, create, follow Jesus, and rally together to do justice and love mercy — not just with our words, but with our actions.

But this «Therefore» doesn't make sense if you look a the end of chapter 11, where Paul has digressed in a lengthy doxology, which while it discusses intriguing mysteries of God and praises God, doesn't lead to the logical conclusion that we should present ourselves as living sacrifices to him, but if you read into that «οὖν» an «as I was saying earlier», you can see that before the doxology he issued an important warning in Romans 11:22 — if God is willing enough to be so severe as to cut of the natural branches (the Jews) he will certainly be willing to cut of the ones that have been grafted on (the Gentiles); Romans 12:1 - 2 is a very logical «therefore» to follow Romans 11:21 - 24.

but obviously you are a lover of the scriptures and there is not enough time or space to discuss all of them here so i will thank you for the interchange and hope we can both agree to continue to follow Jesus» example and keep the peace.

While not wishing to cast apsersions on those who choose to discuss theology and church doctrine and convince folks of their utter sinfulness, even though we have often observed that those methods rarely produce the desired results, we choose to follow in the steps of our Rabbi Jesus, as much as lies within in.

That is what is so frustrating when discussing this because what you should say right at the start is «I believe in a God who doesn't have to follow any rules or logic or reason, can't be disproved even if scientists had 100 % of the universal explanations for existence, and I will continue to believe regardless of what anyone or anything says».

The council said Mr McAteer wasn't dismissed because of his beliefs but because he consistently failed to follow instructions not to discuss them.

(Not that this Jesus is incarnate simply as a remedy for sin; we shall discuss this aspect of the matter in the following section.)

I'm sure many people would consider themselves pacifists but say that this is too extreme a definition, one might say for example that pacifism means «attempting to promote peace and making it a goal, but accepting that war is necessary in some cases to prevent greater evils,» however the way violence vs. following Jesus is being discussed in this context doesn't allow such concessions.

I can not discuss them all here, but the following references are a start: Theodore de Laguna, review of The Principles of Natural Knowledge in Philosophical Review, 29 (1920), 269; Bertrand Russell, review of Science and the Modern World in Nation and Athenaeum, 39 (May 29,1926), 207; Charles Hartshorne, Creativity in American Philosophy (New York: Paragon House, 1984), 5,32,279 - 280; and even though Stephen Pepper believes both Whitehead and Bergson are mistaken in their views, he believes they are extremely similar: see Pepper, Concept and Quality: A World Hypothesis (LaSalle: Open Court, 1967), 340 - 341.

It's been a good reading year and I highly recommend the following to the readers on your Christmas (not «holiday») shopping list: God or Nothing, by Cardinal Robert Sarah (Ignatius Press): It was the book being discussed at Synod - 2015 and with good reason, for this interview - style....

Timpson follows Pope John Paul II in using the story of Tobit as a biblical base for his argument, but does not discuss the Pope's theology of the body with its rich idea of sexuality as a gift.

Regrettably for A.A., I believe, the writer of A.A.'s official biography of Dr. Bob Smith (DR. BOB and the Good Oldtimers) then gratuitously added the following statement — which was not at all a part of the Amos report: «It might also be noted that many terms now considered by A.A.'s to be misleading were then used, not only by non-A.A.'s discussing the movement, but sometimes by members themselves: «cure,» «ex-alcoholic,» «reformed alcoholic»» (DR. BOB and the Good Oldtimers, pp. 135 - 36).

After about an hour of eating and chatting, we moved to the living room and sat on couches where we introduced ourselves (for the several new people that were there), and then discussed that the way of following Jesus was not upward mobility, but downward mobility, into the muck and messiness of life.

If you as believers and non believers think that what I call for is wrong or not a right of prevlage to think of or try to establish thinking in between then I must have been in the wrong place all this time and efforts... Religion is not Completion but rather Correction...!?! It is only then with such knowledge of foundations can mankind use the senses they been gifted to tell which is which for them selves rather than following blindly what ever they been told and not allowed to discuss or look further...!?!

We would do well to follow Giglio's lead in this regard and discuss this situation with civility, not making more of it than necessary.

In this regard Bergson counsels the philosopher: «Nowhere is it clearer that philosophers can not today content themselves with vague generalities, but must follow the scientists in experimental detail and discuss the results with them» (CE 87).

It is not necessary for us to discuss these individually, since the blessed apostle Paul himself; following the order of his predecessor John, writes by name only to seven churches, in the following order: (1) to the Corinthians, (2) to the Ephesians, (3) to the Philippians, (4) to the Colossians, (5) to the Galatians (6) to the Thessalonians, and (7) to the Romans.

My wife just read James yesterday and we were discussing this morning she'd be shocked if the US actually followed the idea of not taking revenge, and letting God handle it.

With the understanding that there may be nuances in specific circumstances not discussed here, I suggest that the following general principles apply in crafting such protections:

Obviously, I couldn't discuss the deliciousness with Lisa, as she didn't get to try it, but instead, I give you the following instant messenger transcript:

Following on from last weeks» blog, which discussed the findings of a survey that set out to establish the UK's favourite sweet treats — which included a number of well established and retro brands — I recently received an email detailing the campaign to «Bring back Banjo», a chocolate bar that hasn't been seen on our shelves since the 1980s.

We'll be moving through each group of ingredients, I'll give you some of the guidelines I've made for myself to follow, and then discuss how they may (or may not) work together when transforming gluten free recipes.

you are such a tw, t every post you bitch and moan like a little girl and constantly calling out anyone who dosent follow your trail of thought,, its old and boring,, we come on here to discuss football not all are going to agree but wanting to attack other peoples views is pathetic... ny gunner sumo big gun may not think the same as you but you shouldnt come on here looking to abuse them,,, and having different opinions dosnt make you an idiot or a fool but then that door swings both ways....

Meanwhile, Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo enters his 11th season in the league following back surgery and as a result, owner Jerry Jones didn't sound too enthused earlier this week when discussing his team's chances this coming campaign.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Having discussed both outlooks, and you can take your pick, it doesn't spoil the patches of individual excellence that has followed much of the usual suspects this season.

Another name who has featured prominently in reports is Roberto Martinez, although it is not acknowledged whether Wigan would be willing to let their manager discuss terms with another club following the turbulence they have already suffered to their close season.

This is an opportunity to discuss the fact that that not all events in life follow rules or predicable patterns.

When precise nutritional or allergen information is important to you due to a diet restriction, an allergy, or a medical condition, the information in this web application isn't a substitute for discussing your situation with your school food service director and following their guidance as well as reading any labels, ingredient lists and warnings provided in the cafeteria.

This doesn't mean you're not setting limits around your child's behavior — if it feels appropriate, you can follow up with your child later to discuss consequences.

While this in and of itself isn't necessary a bad thing, other than the fact that it would take you much longer to finish one nursing session, there are non-serious conditions that could follow overfeeding as well, as we are about to discuss.

If she's doing great with naps and doesn't miss a beat in regards to her demeanor, follow the 15 - min pattern discussed above!

Followed by Betsy Brown Braun, who will discuss her book You're Not The Boss Of Me: Brat Proofing Your Kids.

I happen to be on the fence about breastfeeding in a conversation with one mother who was discussing breast feeding with me (which I have to say is already weird in itself... that is my decision and a private matter that I would prefer not to discuss in public or with strangers...) and her response was to badger me for the following 20 minutes about breastfeeding and how it is the ONLY option.

It's not uncommon to feel alone in your grief following a miscarriage as they are unfortunately often not a subject that is openly discussed.

Of the articles that discussed the possibility of following Britain out of the EU, the majority concluded it would not be in their country's interest to do so.

Smith is discussing Corbyn in terms familiar to anyone who follows Labour politics; that Jeremy is a decent man, but he is not meeting expectations as leader and so must be replaced.

He has an obligation to the people to do that, because I think clearly last night what you saw 12 minutes for each in a very tightly formatted debate where there wasn't a free flow of discussions, where there wasn't follow up most of the time, and there were a lot of topics that wasn't discussed at all and I think we need to have that kind of honest debate.»

QUEENS, NY — Borough President Melinda Katz stated the following about the proposed rent guidelines for leases renewing between October 1, 2015 — September 30, 2016, as discussed at the New York City Rent Guidelines Board Public Meeting in Queens this evening: «Thousands of tenants throughout the city — including Queens — simply can not afford -LSB-...]

Not discussed in the meeting was any potential for a new ethics package following the arrest of Skelos on charges that he used his official power to help his adult son's business interests.

The governor doesn't spend a ton of time with the entertainer — he appears in Cuomo's public schedules just twice, once for a December, 2014 meeting in which the two discussed criminal justice reforms, and for a phone meeting the following month.