Sentences with phrase «not doing something about global warming»

Having a conference is not doing something about global warming the populace says.

Not exact matches

If you believe, along with almost every scientist who has studied the issue, that global warming poses a genuine threat to humanity, doesn't this suggest that we should be doing something about it?

Who either don't believe in Global Warming or don't believe in trying to do something about it.

This approach also relieves pressure on politicians who want to do something about global warming but don't want to impose burdens on the public, a key consideration at a time when high fuel prices and the economy are explosive issues.

From the standpoint of doing something about global warming, the uncertainties are irrelevant unless we don't care what kind of world we leave for future generations - of humans and polar bears.

Even if Americans were in agreement that something should be done about global warming, and they clearly aren't (yet), our political system would choke up like an overflowing septic tank.

The entire scam — essentially blaming Exxon for knowing something about «global warming» it couldn't possibly have known because, hey, nobody did at the time; they don't even know now — was purely designed as a shakedown.

... People think something more like... «Oh look, people who talk about global warming pick and choose the data which they tell us about, and omit that which does not support their view so as to make their own view sound more convincing».

Such rapid warming is problem [mostly] because it tells something about global warming we don't already know - it's unexplained [or indicates that some kind runaway effect could be possible].

Gore's thesis is fourfold: (1) Global Warming is real, (2) Global Warming is a potential catastrophe to human civilization, (3) we CAN do something about it if we act both quickly and responsibly and (4) we are all in this together; it is not (or should not be) a political debate.

People — whether Americans, Europeans, Chinese, or Brazilians — want to do something about global warming; they just don't want to pay much more for energy to do it.

If Waxman pursues it, he could bring together moderate Democrats and Republicans who want to do something about global warming but don't want to spike energy prices.

He isn't a climate - change denier; he says he was «on the side of those who believed in anthropogenic global warming and who believed something ought to be done about it».

Given that we only have one chance to get this right before it's too late, our top priority must be to make sure that we do not settle prematurely and sign a weak bill into law in the name of doing something about global warming.

If human CO2 does actually have something to due with increasing the rate of global warming, whatever scientific evidence you wish to choose shows that the puny amount we add, (less GHG than what termites emit), not only doesn't amount to anything worth worrying about at all — it is so small that it is IMPOSSIBLE to have an effect worth worrying about.

But opposition to doing something about anthropogenic global warming comes largely (although not entirely) from two different sources: fossil fuel interests and the ideology of libertarianism.

In an email to the Guardian he says: «Climate change is no longer something we can aim to do something about in a few decades» time, and that we must not only urgently reduce CO2 emissions but must urgently examine other ways of slowing global warming, such as the various geoengineering ideas that have been put forward.»

SCARBOROUGH: In his movie, An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore claims global warming will cause more flooding on a catastrophic scale if American politicians don't do something about it now.

I can't find the context of the text fragment used as an example of the «minimizes» subset of Level 6 in Table 2 but the most likely reading of the fragment by itself is that it assumes that humans are causing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations to increase and that this is causing or contributing to global warming, so the fragment does say (or at least imply) something about human attribution.