Sentences with phrase «not doing something at all times»

It may become bored and destructive if its mind and body are not doing something at all times.

Not exact matches

«You have to do something new for the customer that someone else is not doing, but at the same time you want them to be able to wrap their head around it a little bit.»
«But if for some reason that's not in the company's best interest,» he said at the time, «I'll find something I can do that will add value.»
It will post directly to your Instagram feed at the scheduled time, now that Instagram allows post management via third - party tools — something their terms of service didn't allow in the past.
It was in its infancy as a service at the time, but it allowed them to give their customers something they didn't know they wanted.
And while the lesson here is at times a bit, er, vivid, it's pretty sensible: either be happy or don't, and never do something now just for the promise of some ambiguous payoff later.
«Unless something big happens, [Apple] doesn't deserve to trade at 20 to 25 times earnings anymore.
Musk did not elaborate, saying that he would probably wait to say something more specific in writing at an unspecified time, though perhaps on the Tesla Blog, to which he contributes on a fairly regular basis.
It's not easy finding a connection between a big Australian cattle company, an American business that makes jet engines, and the Western Australian government's insurance arm, but if you look closely they're all doing something at the same time — selling property.
Worse, when I actually did have time to indulge in something entertaining — reading a book, watching a movie or attending a college football game — it was almost impossible for me to fully enjoy the experience due to the gnawing guilt that I was not at trade show or making a sales call or reconciling the financials.
Don't start a new program without looking at your company budget and employee schedules to see whether the endeavor is something your startup can afford at this time, says Parcells.
Even Dr. House and his team of ace diagnosticians may claim at times that something is likely wrong with the MRI machine when the image it has generated does not support their current diagnosis.
It's an especially good feature if you're reading a long article or simply don't want the phone to go to sleep when you're looking at something longer than the screen's default 30 - second time - out period.
However, if you want something done right repeatedly, day - in and day - out, all day long, and you don't have the time to do 10 full - time jobs all at once, you can't do it yourself.
Even if your uncle is a terrific guy who sincerely wants to give you money, you should get something in writing — a letter will do — saying that he does not expect you to pay him back at any time.
At the same time, building businesses in machine - like fashion just doesn't seem like something I'd enjoy doing.
Sure, the task at hand sounds very easy at first, but using the wrong strategy will lead you to waste time and money and possibly get you in trouble with Google — which is something you definitely do not want.
Without taking the time to think carefully about where your notions of achievement and purpose come from and what success means to you, you're in a terrible position to decide if this week's hot «how to be successful» advice applies to you or only to someone who thinks the point of life is something you actually don't value much at all.
I probably was a little more flexible on the stay at home path for a time being because I was able to create something unique for myself so I didn't completely leave the work life.»
If you don't want to sink much more into something you'll only use for a couple hours at a time, try the Koss Fitclips.
These efforts made us feel good because we were doing something but the programs were not producing significant, measurable results.At the same time, drawing on publishing experience I had gained in my prior position as Asia marketing director for the online division of Knight - Ridder, at the time one of the largest newspaper companies in the world, I quietly created content - rich marketing and PR programs on the Web.Against the advice of the PR agency professionals we had on retainer (who insisted that news releases were only for journalists), we wrote and sent dozens of releases ourselves.
There's always something happening in the industry you need to be responsive too, but you can't tell what and when at the time you are doing the plan.
At times, like when he hears something he doesn't approve of, he looks like someone you would not want to cross.
You don't have the pressure to create active income because you're living off your passive, but at the same time you are still growing, moving forward, and giving something to society.
Most people don't have the constitution to lose at something 99 times out of 100.
Because it serves to remind us that even today the «money» that commercial banks and other private - market financial firms produce is in an important respect not the real McCoy at all, but ersatz (if often more convenient) stuff that serves in place of it, and does so only because the firms that supply it, not only make it very convenient to use (e.g., by swiping a debit card), but at the same time offer its users something akin to money - back (which is to say, a «money proper» - back) guarantees.
If the fundamentals and the technicals are completely opposed to each other, if the economic data is completely mixed, if the trends are sometimes showing up and sometimes showing down at the same time, and we have all sorts of different ways where we can find that, a lot of times the best approach, and this is something people don't ever want to hear, but I tell them often, is sometimes the best trade is no trade at all.
At The Motley Fool, we believe investors «gamble» every time they commit money to something they don't understand.
And when asked where the ideas came from, the company's executives always said something like «we see behaviors from our community and we try to build on top of them» or «I don't spend too much time looking at what other people are doing or not doing
[JC] The thing I do with my wife (who is also a graphic artist) is we go on tons of vacations.So, when I get back from tour (after about a week or so) we'll go on a vacation together.It gives my wife something to look forward to, and during that time I'll try not to do any work at all.It's kind of goofy, but I think we have a lot more quality time versus quantity time.
This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.
Also, morality is not external (if byexternal that you mean something that you can know is right or wrong has to be determined by a larger body or set of policies created by someone else many years ago to be official), and morality does not necessarily flow from religion (plenty of Catholic priests, Islamic Imams, Protestant preachers wave their hands high in the air in the afternoon, at praise time, and when the lights go down they crawl on their bellies, and hands and knees like snakes and dogs).
I'm sure I'm not using the right wording but it is easy to say something is outdated dogma by only looking at the last line of a book that has been in process for 2,000 years (i.e. 9 times older than the government trying to tell it what to do).
How is it that an inspired woman could write scripture (e.g., Mary's song), and an inspired woman could determine for both a king and a high priest whether something is scripture (e.g., the prophet Huldah in 2 Kings 22 and 2 Chronicles 34)-- or at least could do these things in the time of the Old Testament — but an inspired woman can not now teach about God?
It did mean something to me, even though I didn't realize it at the time.
In short, we do not know whether we are dealing again with something like Kohlberg's conventional stages, but this time focused on care rather than duty, or whether we would find a wide variety of interpretations based on varying degrees and levels of social perspective - taking, leading to compassionate response at and beyond the level of face - to - face concern.
You need to give it some time, and also, if you don't carry through, consider it something to try later on when perhaps you'll be at a place where it can be more useful.
People like you in the past often chose to believe God did something science couldn't explain at the time, but could explain later.
I didn't realise it at the time, but singing songs like these together helped to foster something deep and meaningful in my life.
When I jumped (and I do mean jumped, a ready or not here I come, head - first dive) from the Sunday - mainstream - church - going - because - it's - what - you - do nominal / cultural Christianity that I was raised with into «serious» Christianity (to use the vernacular: born again, spirit filled, Bible believing, charismatic, etc.) and became what was at the time called a «Jesus freak» (it was 1972) I expected something from the church which was very different than what I found.
She had apparently got to the point where she honestly did not know that a child is the natural fruit of a union between a man and a woman: in her understanding «sex» is something done for pleasure, according to one's desires, whether lesbian or homosexual or whatever, and procreation an entirely different matter connected with options presented at various times, possibly involving in - vitro fertilization and test - tubes.
The following is the answer that + Vincent gave at a press conference, to a question about the provision of an Ordinariate «cathedral»: «I think that is something probably beyond their resources at the present time, and I don't think the Ordinariate would thank us, actually, to simply give it responsibility for a church that it would have to then maintain and upkeep.»
everything is made up of atoms (don't believe me do some research) its the different variables of heat and light and things like that that cause different reactions to make different things and these things when they interact can create something completely different and you and slowly the process of mitosis or miosis starts to work and form stuff hell i learnt that in high school and it was a catholic one at that a millions of years ago i bet the universe was completely different and had things in it that our minds cant even imagine that have since changed over time from action and reaction to what we have today and in another million years who knows with all the different gases we pump into the air and the weather getting more intense on both ends of the scale life as we know it will be different the human race will have to evolve to survive and will probibly form into a slightly different species hell maybe well evolve into 2 different species like in the movie time machine
And I have eleventy - billion of these moments a day too, seemingly small, times when my breath catches and I have no camera or pen nearby so I'm going to have to rely on my something in my soul remembering it forever because it's a step up a mountain, a roll of the rock of my own stubbornness, and I don't have any gods at the top, pushing me back to the bottom, laughing at my futile efforts.
These «blood moons» are completely natural occurances, something they didn't fathom at the time.
If every time we didn't understand something we stopped at «goddidit» we would still be sitting caves waiting for the next thunderstorm to create a fire so we could cook some food.
If I created some tech tv show that stated that this and that happened a gaggle - ga - zillion years or after something else, it would make no sense, because it does not relate to the time at hand, that is, the time on your watch right now, based on some calendar.
IF WE COULD GET THE REPUBLICAN»S OUT OF ANYTHING THAT IS POLITICAL THEN WE WOULD HAVE SOMETHING TO BE PROUD OF!!!!!! I»M ASHAMED TO SAY I USED TO BE A REPUBLICAN NOT ANYMORE EVEN AT THE POINT OF A GUN I WILL NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN AGAIN!!!!!!! AFTER WHAT REAGAN DID TO OUR TRADE UNION»S IN 1980 AND THE REST OF THE REPUBLICAN CRIMINAL»S ARE JUST AS BAD!!!!!! I CAN THINK OF SEVERAL REPUBLICAN GOVENOR»S THAT I WOULD NOT WASTE THE TIME TO SPIT ON OR THE SALIVA!!!!!!
In concept I want to put in writing like this additionally taking time and actual effort to make a very good article but what can I say I procrastinate alot and not at all seem to get something done.
They call them peddlers of religion, and they do not mean that in a positive way, but rather are referring to people they believe are trying to push their own agenda of a psuedo - religious toxic mix of some sort of religious something, politics, power, control, personal profit (think $ $ $) and efforts to feel good about ones self while at the same time looking down on neighbors (condescension) rather than loving neighbors.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z