Not exact matches
The campaign isn't just about touting Sobeys» produce section, but also encouraging shoppers to
eat more greens and to find new ways
of adding veggies into everyday cooking.
So, yes, there is a decline in the restaurant industry's sales, but it's probably
more because
of how relatively expensive it is to
eat out,
not the back - and - forth between Trump and Clinton.
«In some
of our markets the reality is that we haven't been changing at the same rate as customers»
eating - out expectations — or
more specifically, their expectations
of us at McDonald's,» he said on the call.
In other words, exercising after a long period
of not eating could set us up for a longer,
more intense fat burn, noted Eric Doucet, the lead author on the study and a professor
of kinesiology at the University
of Ottowa.
Plus when you drink a bottle
of water before you
eat, when you sit down at the table you'll already feel a little
more full and won't be as tempted to
eat past the point
of hunger.
While this is a blow to the idea that nationwide calorie menu requirements will dramatically alter the way America
eats, it doesn't necessarily mean the policy is useless: perhaps, as the authors speculate, it may be
more effective in sit - down restaurants where dining expectations are different, or for specific groups
of particularly health - concious diners.
Eating a mid-afternoon meal replacement bar doesn't just bridge the lunch and dinner gap, it's an easy way to get in the habit of eating smaller meals more frequ
Eating a mid-afternoon meal replacement bar doesn't just bridge the lunch and dinner gap, it's an easy way to get in the habit
of eating smaller meals more frequ
eating smaller meals
more frequently.
The memory -
eating disease, expected to afflict 15 million Americans by 2060 (and tens
of millions
more around the world as life expectancy increases), has no cure; a new drug for the condition hasn't been approved in well over a decade; initially promising experimental treatments seem to be failing with clockwork regularity; and there's
not even a definitive consensus on what, exactly, biopharma companies should focus on while developing Alzheimer's medicines.
While Fredette's job isn't always glamorous (it involves frequent meetings with the company's marketing and consumer research departments),
more than 50 %
of his time is spent in the kitchen, where he experiments with flavor pairings, makes ingredients, develops recipes, mixes test batches, and yes —
eats a lot
of ice cream.
Sadly, Zuckerberg did
not say much
more about baked goods for people who really just want to be
eating cake in the morning, maybe because he realized the limits
of the analogy.
«After
more than a decade
of our
eating biotech foods, there has
not been a single scientifically confirmed case
of human illness that can be attributed to food biotechnology,» he writes.
It's nice to know if something you want to
eat more of is healthy, but intellectual ideas don't motivate.
If you want to
eat less junk food, instead
of trying
not to
eat potato chips,
eat more fruits, nuts, carrots, and other quick healthy food.
Some days you can find a burger or lasagna oozing with cheese in the Cantina — we haven't taken an abstinence - only approach to nutrition management — but on an average day,
more than half
of our employees
eat a salad, even when presented with yummier choices.
And the ideal road toll should properly reflect the amount
of road being used — in the same manner that people who
eat a lot
of bananas pay
more than those who don't.
You will
not only burn
more calories
eating a series
of smaller meals but also avoid the afternoon crash and end
of the workday slump.
«They want to make up their own dictionary version
of what meat is, and these are people who do
not eat meat,» says Suzanne Strassburger, whose family has been in the meat business for
more than 150 years.
For example, Crockpot it if you don't cook to
eat cheap and healthy and gain tips on what to do with leftover turkey slices, how to make various curries and make tons
of beans
more palatable.
«Ten percent less fat,» might
not actually mean very much less fat, and it does
not necessarily mean that you can
eat more of it or that it is really
more healthful.
«Repeatedly, and in different ways, throughout this book, you actually demonstrate with a generous mix
of insight and proven examples, how» dog -
eat - dog» marketing simply isn't necessary; how ethical marketing is
not only easier to implement but far
more effective!
If being able to
more easily purchase meat and poultry raised without antibiotics is important to you, Halloran has this advice: «Wherever you
eat, ask restaurant managers about their meat sourcing policies and practices and make sure they know that you're looking for options that are healthier
not only for you but for the animals and the environment, too — including meat produced without the routine use
of antibiotics.»
If you want to
eat less junk food, instead
of trying
not to
eat potato chips,
eat more fruits, nuts, carrots, and other quick food.
I am
not big with cooking pies and dessert in general, but had quite a chunk
of butter left and there was no way I would
eat it all on... Read
more
«The later stages
of the 2009 — 2017 bull market are a valuation illusion built on share buyback alchemy... The technique optically reduces the price - to - earnings multiple because the denominator doesn't adjust for the reduced share count... Share buybacks are a major contributor to the low volatility regime because a large price insensitive buyer is always ready to purchase the market on weakness... Share buybacks result in a lower volatility, lower liquidity, which in turn incentivizes
more share buybacks, further incentivizing passive and systematic strategies that are short volatility in all their forms... Like a snake
eating its own tail, the market can
not rely on share buybacks indefinitely to nourish the illusion
of growth.
Transaction costs can
eat up a significant portion
of your yield if you are
not careful; trading
more efficiently is always a good idea.
So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer,
not eating certain things, sabaath and many
more just because he said so, even though we have no record
of him saying anything, just records
of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».
«Doing this challenge during the 30 days
of Ramadan is even
more of a test as I won't be
eating or drinking during the day.»
A
more reasonable argument against wine is made based on an interpretation
of Romans 14:21: «It is better
not to
eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.»
Why does God have to tell you people everything... maybe he wants you to figure out on your own that these aren't the days
of the flood any
more, there are plenty
of things to
eat besides killing one
of his defenseless creatures.
According to the Bible God hated
more than he loved, and the crap that is the 1st few books
of the old testament, which s barbaric and evil,
not only to those men that are an abombanation, but those that
not only
eat pork, but touch a football, shellfish, work on the sabbath, blasphamy, slaves who do
nt allow there master to sleep with there wifes / daughters, and those that dared
not idolise him because he is a jealous and vengeful God!
The study, published in the January edition
of the British Journal
of Psychiatry, says spiritual but
not religious people, as opposed to people who are religious, agnostic or atheist, were
more likely to develop a «mental disorder,» «be dependent on drugs» and «have abnormal
eating attitudes,» like bulimia and anorexia.
Tearfund said a third
of all food produced globally is
not eaten and waste on this scale is «fueling climate change, causing
more droughts, floods and less reliable rain, making life harder for the people in poverty across the world that Tearfund works with».
Emmanuel Levinas says, «Life is love
of life, a relationship with contents that are
not my being but
more dear than my being; thinking,
eating, sleeping, reading, working, warming oneself in the sun.»
Although I can
not prove the existence
of God to anyone, including myself, he is
more real to me than the food I
eat.
And her comparison between loving Christ and loving
eating could
not be
more evangelical: you stop loving Christ if you make him into an idol so that he is no longer the God exposed in the flesh, born
of poor and displaced parents, in a stable amid animals, dung and flies, who hung helpless on a cross and who promised to be among the hungry, the sick, the little ones
of all ages, in every street child.
She discusses theology intelligently, stating the case for obedience even
more strongly than did God: «From the fruit
of the tree that is in the midst
of the garden, God said, «You shall
not eat from it and you shall
not touch it, lest you die.
This is the time
of year we start to think about what we have or don't have, usually spurring on our New Year's resolutions to
eat healthier, start working out
more or accomplish something we've always wanted to do but never tried.
Unlike the Christian god that wouldn't ever change his mind or doctrine... except for cursing the world for
eating an apple... except for telling Abraham to sacrifice his son, but then stopping him... and except for killing nearly all life on Earth and then because
of the guilt says I'll never to do that ever again - in exactly that way... and except for deciding that 2
of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any
more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and except for forgiving all sin, when «In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the
eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host
of others... and except for... and except for...
So what makes these prayers any
more ridiculous than praying for world peace, or a loved one to recover from an illness, or strength to
not eat a whole bucket
of KFC.
«I prefer a church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security...
More than by fear
of going astray, my hope is that we will be moved by the fear
of remaining shut up within structures which give us a false sense
of security, within rules which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door people are starving and Jesus does
not tire
of saying to us: «Give them something to
eat.»»
Eating dinner isn't like this; making love isn't like this; national identity isn't, for most
of us, like this: all these are mere parts
of our identity, elements to be placed in a larger and
more encompassing context.
And if a friendship can
not survive the setting
of boundaries, we must question whether it ever was very deep: Was the friend anything
more than a consumer,
eating up our time and affections?
For example, the man who fasts develops strength
of will because he decides
not to
eat or drink; he becomes
more considerate
of his fellowmen; he becomes pious and virtuous; his spirit is enlightened and his body becomes clean
of sin.
Essentially, James Alison seemed to be arguing that original sin wasn't
eating forbidden fruit, but in in the improper imitation
of God, and (
more importantly), trying to cover up what we have done by blaming others for our own actions.
Why is it that we continue to flock to megachurches,
eat hungrily from the hands
of prosperity - gospel preachers and buy Christian - living books that aren't much
more than humanistic doctrine camouflaged as biblical exhortation?
You don't need to grab the biggest piece
of cake any
more, because you are one body, and her
eating it is as good as your
eating it.
The woman, for her part, also says the thing which is
not, albeit in innocence: she answers
not the question that was asked, says
more than was called for, identifies the forbidden tree as the one «in the midst
of the garden,» adds «neither shall ye touch it» to the prohibition, and, most importantly, converts the predicted consequences
of disobedience («for in the day thou
eatest thereof, dying you will die»; 2:17) into the reason for obedience («Ye shall
not eat of it... lest you die»; 3:3).
Yeah, your god had to sacrifice himself to himself to appease himself so that he doesn't torture
more than 99.99 %
of his creation for all eternity because our great - great grandmother talked to a snake and wrongly
ate a piece
of fruit before she understood what «wrong» was.
Out -
of - control
eating seems so awful it can
not even be talked about in public; discussing masturbatory practices and sexual preferences would be easier — and
more socially acceptable — than discussing fantasies and fetishes having to do with food.
If it is true that there is
more heavenly rejoicing over the lost sheep that is found than over the sheep that have
not strayed, God's embrace shows one important sense in which the history that began with the
eating of forbidden fruit in the Garden and that will end in the heavenly city is a good one.