Sentences with phrase «not established a belief»

Not exact matches

No entrepreneur can afford to create a company culture that isn't based on certain fundamental beliefs established right at the start of the enterprise.

It doesn't matter how much blood, sweat, tears, time and money you've put into your idea, your startup's worth is established by the investor's belief in you and your idea.

This is not so much a belief or strategy as it is a matter of fact; there are extensive, well - established guidelines from multiple agencies at all levels of government on how to work within the system, and harsh consequences for those who do not comply.

This prejudice favouring traditional religions demonstrates a degree of imperial ethics... Sometimes, while not based on established jurisprudence, the perception is that we are prepared to challenge in the courts a newer religion with different belief structures but are prepared to accept the more established religions.

Jesus said; I will show you my faith by my works: Faith without works is dead: (There is no life) = If we have the Faith of Christ (a gift from God) then we will have the works that go with it that is evident of our faith; the works will testify to our faith, then do we produce fruit that will remain: If our heart does not convict us to do what is right according the written word, then we are not in faith: Our hearts are far from the life of Words of our Lord penetrating into our hearts because our hearts are wicked; even Paul who said; follow me as I am of Christ; how was that??? In and by the Holy Spirit, even Spirit of truth as Paul takes us through the Words of the Lord to have us established in the truth: The Word of our Lord is as refined silver, 7 times in the fire: Jesus is the author and finisher of our faith, to them who believe: In the Bible one's «belief» and one's «behavior» are often compared.

«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»

4) Evolution is not a belief, it is an established scientific model that is also the pillar of multiple scientific disciplines.

Without establishing that your God exists, the Bible, scriptures, religions and all beliefs associated with that God are not valid.

You demand evidence for God that fits your standards yet the evidence of your own belief can not fit the demands you established.

This was done in a nation with a strong established church, so that the freedom enabled by religious toleration at its origins was a freedom of private worship and belief for dissenters, but not quite a freedom of common action in the public square.

Up to this point we have established the fact that inherent in the deliberations of reason is the subjective and predictive factor, that reason is hypothesis - making, that, in short, it makes acts of belief, and that in order to attain truth, belief as hypothesis - making is not only reasonable but necessary.

They assume not only a settled ecclesiastical system in the Church, but also an established body of orthodox beliefs against which to judge heresy and, what is most significant, a collection of Christian Scriptures.

The word «conservative» (from «con - servator» = «one who preserves») simply refers to a rigid conformity with orthodox or establish ways or beliefs, it doesn't refer to what those beliefs might be.

Thus C. F. Evans notes the possibility that «the concept of exaltation to the right hand of God... was prior to the idea of resurrection in establishing belief in Jesus» lordship and messiahship, for it leads directly to it, while resurrection from the dead, as such, does not».36

He has since given many signs of his support for the present pope; when many of his episcopal brethren were doing everything they could to undermine the motu proprio establishing the right to celebrate the «old Mass», he made clear his belief that the rite of John XXIII «is not a relic, not a reverting to the past, but part of the living tradition of the Church».»

All of these items — Jesus» Nazareth origin, his baptism by John, the Galilean locale of his ministry, his execution by the Gentiles — are examples of facts of which we can be especially sure because later interests and beliefs of the churches would have led to a denial of them if they had not been well authenticated and firmly established.

Further, as already indicated, I would add that this second condition does not need to be met at the moment the thought is articulated; otherwise, all creative advances in thinking, which break beyond established beliefs and theory, would be discarded as incoherent and even irrational.

Not identified with any traditional or established belief or practice.

The fact that later Christianity effected a link between the two beliefs and that today the ordinary Christian simply confuses them has not persuaded me to be silent about what I, in common with most exegetes, regard as true; and all the more so, since the link established between the expectation of the «resurrection of the dead» and the belief in «the immortality of the soul» is not in fact a link at all but renunciation of one in favour of the other.

I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».

Furthermore, the judge who ruled against the Leeds Adoption Agency said very firmly: «Those who follow religious beliefs long established across Europe can not be equated with racist bigots.

Take a good look, it isn't only atheists, and it isn't every individual, that are seemingly frustrated to the point of CAPS, that they can not choose their words wisely enough, to convey their established beliefs, or convince another mind of the veracity of there disclosed thoughts.

How have you established that the God in which she now holds belief is the correct God, and not actually a false God?

If you can't establish the fundamental (s) of your (hateful) belief system, you should just shut the fuck up.

Wow... it's almost as though evolution, as a firmly established scientific theory accepted by members of all religious beliefs, isn't being used effectively to indoctrinate children into atheism!

If a belief can not be established as demonstrative fact, any legislature based on that unsubstantiated belief can not provide equality.

Justice Thomas, in dissent, wrote, «The practices and beliefs of the founding generation establish that «the freedom of speech,» as originally understood, does not include a right to speak to minors (or a right of minors to access speech) without going through the minors» parents or guardians.»

One can imagine it is logically possible for same - sex marriage to be established, while those who believe it is not marriage are fully protected in their religious freedom to act on that belief.

Whether formulated by Durkheim (a system of beliefs and practices related to sacred things), by Weber (that which finally makes events meaningful), or by Tillich (whatever is of ultimate concern) religion in its «classical» sense refers not so much to labels on a church building as to the imagery (myth, theology, and so forth) by which people make sense of their lives — their «moral architecture,» if you will.6 That human beings differ in their sensitivity to and success in this matter of «establishing meaning» there can be no doubt.

In a similar fashion, the Revivalism of the Great Awakening transformed certain of the central symbols of Puritanism and introduced new values and beliefs which questioned not only the authority and function of Crown and Parliament but also the traditional role and power of established clergy and magistrate alike.

Yet we may with confidence assert that, for the time of the Judges, such law as existed in established usages like blood revenge, and in certain tribal and family customs, was not sufficient to supplant the belief that might constituted the supreme socially valid norm, qualified mainly by the restraining magical powers of the oath and curse.

For the folks commenting that God can see thru your false belief, Pascal addressed that: «Following his argument establishing the Wager, Pascal addressed the possibility that some people may not be willing to sincerely believe in God even after acknowledging the enormous benefit of betting in favor of God's existence.

We have no sin God created Adam & Eve to rule Earth... Jesus was Assassinated by conspiracy among those from the Children of Israel who took him for a Corrupter corrupting their beliefs... and since Judaism did not invite converts they had to officially establish a new religion to convert non Jews to it and then use them as a sword in their hands to fulfill their prophecies of ruling the world...!

It is easy, of course, once a conceptual dualism of this kind has been established, to argue that culture can not be understood sociologically unless it is «explained» in terms of social structure — unless the «sources» or «causes» of religious beliefs are located within such obdurate features of the social world as class interests, power relations, social networks, family backgrounds, and the like.

While you can not knock his confidence and self - belief, you can instantly label him a» disillusioned kid», with the former Inter Milan prodigy having turned 20 just last summer has already established a reputation for being highly - strung, temperamental and a bit of a baby.

Contrary to common belief, when a man's name is on a child's birth certificate as the father, this doesn't establish paternity.

«The secretary of state acknowledges that clauses 2.43 and 2.44 of the Funding Agreement, and clauses 23E and 23G above do not prevent discussion of beliefs about the origins of the Earth and living things, such as creationism, in Religious Education, as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory.»

It's more the belief they can't win against the two established parties.

In Australia and New Zealand, there does not appear to be a singular definition of the philosophies that underpin naturopathic practice, but essential to most is the unshakeable belief in the healing power of nature that is, living systems have an inherent ability to establish, maintain, and restore health.

We don't just want to sit on the board, we want to mobilize parents to take back their school district — establish a new culture of leadership and a belief that every school can succeed.»

We didn't just say what our core beliefs were, we started abiding by them from the day we established our business.

Leonor Antunes said: «I am interested in the dialogue that a specific craftsmanship establishes within a certain perspective of modernity — particularly how architects / designers engaged with the vernacular — revealing not a nostalgia for a world before modernism, but rather a legacy regarding a belief in the artwork as representing an ongoing engagement in a process.»

Interesting, isn't it, that Krosnick has conducted a poll amongst the public, to see if their beliefs match those of the scientists, but neglected to poll scientists to establish their views.

The human condition is such that shaking somebody from the comfort zone afforded by a well established belief is not easy.

The course doesn't waste time wringing its hands over whether or not to call deniers «deniers» — a true skeptic, Cook explains in his welcome video, «doesn't come to a conclusion until they've considered the evidence,» while «someone who denies well - established science comes to a conclusion first, and then discounts any evidence that conflicts with their beliefs.»

«Dogma is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, ideology or any kind of organization: it is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practioner or believers.»

Judith >... established belief or doctrine held by a religion, ideology or any kind of organization: it is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practioner or believers... The term «dogmatic» is often used disparagingly to refer to any belief that is held stubbornly.»

«The IPCC is a disgrace to science... Its reports are not an honest assessment of climate because they omit, dismiss or distort research findings that do not conform to a certain belief... The IPCC was established on the basis of alarmist claims that were given a political di...

The barrier here is the belief that blogging isn't all that important: you need to help establish that it is important, that it's a priority that deserves and requires the lawyer's time and attention.

For civil law purposes, an excuse of self - defence based on non-existent facts that were honestly but unreasonably believed to exist has to fail; the belief has to have been reasonably held, and it may be that even that will not suffice to establish the defence.