Sentences with phrase «not everything they claim»

The Church knows that not everything claimed for God's Word can be accepted as such, despite the convictions of its advocates.

Earlier we talked about «overrated health foods» that are not everything they claim to be.

Not exact matches

Don't let the illusion of perceived influence fool you into trusting a leader who isn't exactly everything she claims to be, and don't fall into the same trap yourself.

Watch out for: The optimist who tells you that everything is going to go viral, or who claims that something's viral but can't back up the statement with numbers.

The cynic in me, of course, doesn't believe Freddy's claim that under the Cooperative, everything will be better.

«We will do everything we can to assure that these claims do not distract us from our ongoing efforts to rationalize...

encrypts everything and claims not to store user data on its servers.

It's sad that the ones claiming to be the most intelligent, didn't want to be friends with the most intelligent being in existence, the one that created everything they'd study, and knew their end from the beginning.

Your own behavior proves it.Just like Tom Tom you don't care what some Christian says.You disregard everything but claim that whatever may change your mind.

But God don't lie... he made you and he claims everything he made is good.

Its all nice and fun to pretend that perhaps a meteor strike caused life to begin but you still fail to tell me who created that meteor, who created everything that was needed for life to exist... really... that had to of been a start to it all somewhere and I would love to see an atheist stumble on explaining only «what they claim to know» while refusing to believe what they don't know and can't see.

Finally, I don't think I need to offer statistics to address such claims as women are «taking control of everything» and «starting to dominate» among «doctors, lawyers, bankers, accountants.»

But I trust that our countrymen will not be softened to that kind of crimes and criminals; for if we should, our hearts will be hardened to everything which has a claim on our benevolence.

since he didn't we can assume that phrase (like everything else he claimed to have uttered) should be attributed to the Egyptian sun god Horus for whom Jesus was completely plagiarized from.

I am a believer who does not claim affiliation to any sect because they all add their own prejudiced dogma most of which is that you have to believe that everything in the bible is beyond refute.

In a time that promises the reconcilation of happiness and productivity through chemical mood control, we can claim a right to our «natural moods» only if we can show that they aren't — like everything else in the cosmos — finally random collections chemicals or just tools for species survival but are natural gifts or indispensable clues to the truth about who we are.

Afterall does nt the bible claim that everything else on this planet is for your enjoyment!

The bible claim that God knows everything is not dis - proven by sheer rejection of the theology (where we just choose not to believe) nor can it be rationally rejected just because we do not know (we'd be displacing rational approaches with our own theology).

Its easier to related to Muhammad than to Jesus or Buddha because he never claimed that he was of divine origin, he was as shocked at his revelation as anybody else, he frequently said many times «I'm a man amongst men,» he frequently said «all the good that happens comes from Allah and everything that is not good is my fault,» he's very human and that is what makes him relatable.

------ By the way, Bob, I don't claim to understand everything.

and you believe everything you see and hear from the media, especially the ones who claim to be objective when in fact they are totally not?

The «my jaw dropped open» moment: Dawkins says he humbly admits that science does not know everything and Bill jumps in to claim that humility is after all a Christian trait.

What would say to those who would claim that because God does not lie Titus 2:1, and that He is perfect, that to say His word is inerrant would contradict everything the Bible has to say?

I would never suggest that everything atheists do makes sense or is good, just as I hope you wouldn't try to claim everything Christians do makes sense or is good.

Just like everything else in the world, there are those that claim to be something but do not follow the actual teachings of that religion.

I do not claim that we believe in everything, nor that we are free to.

Besides no one said I was an athiest, but unlike you I don't claim to know everything, but leave myself open to see the world through proof.

One can live on little food, but not on none; one can defy his environment, but never wholly escape social claims; one can get more education, but can never know everything; one can live to a ripe old age, but eventually the grim reaper comes his way.

Indeed, he might well claim the realization of Francis Cornish as his personal testimony: «Somehow I've drifted into a world where religion, but not orthodoxy, is the fountain of everything that makes sense» (p. 378).

Radical theology isn't everything and doesn't claim to be.

Second, I have never claimed that as a human I will have the answer for everything, but the one answer I will never use is «if I can't understand it, it must the doing of a supernatural being».

You have got it all wrong, but may I ask that what poof do you have about what you claim, Allah is the almighty and is not a deceiver, Allah in the Qur» an in referred as the most merciful, all forgiving, creater of everything and self subsistence he does not require anyone to support him and Allah is having no son neither wife, and tell me how can a almighty supreme being have sexual relations?

Atheists do not claim to know everything, they simply are not convinced by the things that have convinced you.

This is certainly not different from William James's claim that determinism implies the static «block universe» nor from Bergsons's identical claim that in the universe of Spinoza and Laplace «everything is given» («tout est donné»).

I'm not aware of any atheist who claims to have created everything.

She claims she doesn't need to read it, because the title tells her everything she needed to know.

From that perspective, one knows that not everything that is real is observable, that even scientific knowledge is partial and fallible, and that religious and scientific truth claims can in principle be perfectly compatible, even complementary.

Well Lawrence you can't dig yourself out of the hole you made when you claimed that everything has to be created.

Even if you would know everything there is to know about Shinto, that does not give you the right to claim that god (or gods) is protecting a specific building from a tsunami, on the top of a hill, no less.

I don't see anyone claiming to know everything, so I guess you're just talking about your god or something right?

Or it could be that not everything can be easily understood by the human mind — so the paradoxes you claim are illogical may not be to you.

We fall for anything, hate everything, curse people to heII when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claim victory for hurting anyone who's not a Christians feelings, while standing for bigotry and racism, but will gladly use poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grader.

I don't believe for one moment he knew everything and I've never heard anyone claim he did.

suni people is true islam, although some are claimed to be suni, but suni is not terrorism or sheit, suni is that we do everything allah told us to do and forbiddent all things he forbided, and as his prophet mohamed says and did.

I think you would really have to stretch things a lot to argue that there wasn't an actual person who was the root of the Jesus legend, but to say that everything outlined in the Gospels is a historical record of that person is something that very few scholars would claim, and I can't think of any who would try to argue that claims to godhood can be seen as historical evidence of actual godhood.

All I can say is that I've been around long enough to know that I haven't learned everything yet, that my mind has changed before and can be changed again with new evidence, and that anyone who claims to know that something will remain true forever is a damn fool.

Bill, can explain to us why everything the lDiots claim is irriducibly complex, turns out to not be?

Atheists don't claim to know everything or everything — that's retarded — nor does Atheism connote a positive theory of the impossibility of the supernatural.

We can not and need not reinterpret everything in the Scriptures to agree with Jesus, which is what would be required if we claimed the Christ as our principle of interpretation.

The unlimited freedom of everybody to claim absolute freedom for everything works like a sort of secret brain - washing by anonymous powers which does not necessarily abolish freedom but narrows in advance the sphere in which the individual can make his free decision.