Our theories are PROBABLE explanations for natural phenomena
not the factual histories.
Not exact matches
Those who take «the bible» as the literal word of god would do well to study the
factual history of the compilations of ancient stories of the OT and
NT that they cherish.
The book is
not remotely plausible as a
factual history, but after Lewis read it he was permanently incapable of believing in Whig
history.
A Resurrection of his physical body, such as is implied by the empty tomb and by some of the stories in the Gospels of his appearances, would point towards a docetic Christ who does
not fully share the lot of men; unless, indeed, bodily corruption were to be regarded as being bound up with the sinfulness of man which Christ did
not share (but, unless we accept an impossibly literalistic interpretation of Genesis 3 as
factual history, it is impossible to hold that physical dissolution is
not part of the Creator's original and constant intention for his creatures in this world).
Lampe details why he does
not take the story of the empty tomb as
factual history.
«I do
not accept the divine conception of either Jesus or Augustus as
factual history, but I believe that God is incarnate in the Jewish peasant poverty of Jesus and
not in the Roman imperial power of Augustus.»
In fact, however, as I have indicated, I do
not think that the Synoptic traditions should be taken for the most part as
factual history, but rather as reflections, cast in narrative form, of the theological thinking of the early Church about the Easter appearances and of various current controversies about them.
2) The bible is a work of fiction, or at least it's
not a fully
factual account of actual events in
history.
You adamantly refuse to recognise the historical fact that «scientific atheism» was both a foundational philosophical position and an actual policy of the Soviet Union and other atheist states from the time of Lenin on, and responsible for massive persecution, torture, suffering, humiliation and death far in excess of the numbers of the «victims» of Christianity - So now the
history that isn't in your book is
factual?
Don't just have blind faith in the theology of the past, rigorously investigate with an open mind and embrace the
factual history that is discovered.
Yes, I think it is... exactly how accurate, can
not, will
not, hazard a guess, but the recordings of our human
history annotated in the Bible have to have some
factual basis... I can
not imagine it is all fiction.
Given his
history as an oil and coal industry consultant who ignores 97 % of working climate scientists worldwide, why doesn't Arizona State consider it a problem for Dr. Balling to promote his political positions as if they were
factual?
MacKenzie Bezos wrote a very long one - starred review and one of the more notable statements she made was «While numerous
factual inaccuracies are certainly troubling in a book being promoted to readers as a meticulously researched definitive
history, they are
not the biggest problem here.
The credit reference agencies can
not offer an opinion to lenders on your «creditworthiness» - they only pass on
factual information about your borrowing
history.