Christianity is not a blind faith — it's
not fideism.
Not exact matches
Well, whether I was right or
not, among the responses I provoked none surprised me more than the accusation of «
fideism.»
More often than
not the philosopher is maligned as the progenitor of European irrationalism and
fideism (la Isaiah Berlin).
Their critique of reason opens the door also to forms of irrationalism and
fideism that the deconstructive post-modernists do
not, in fact, want.
One can have recourse to
fideism and subjectivism, but the question remains: How does one show that
fideism is
not myth?
However, from my perspective, it is
not his pacifism that makes Hauerwas vulnerable to charges of
fideism and sectarianism.
Whether Mr. Hollinger knows it or
not, he and the pope are on the same side in contending against both ideological secularism and religious
fideism.
Does
not his entire enterprise threaten to veer toward
fideism since it lacks the support of a meaning that could announce its other origin by confronting me?
To believe that whether or
not scholars are Christian is irrelevant to the excellence of their scholarship is to reject a rich philosophical and theological tradition and to adopt a form of the
fideism for which many Catholics justly criticize many Protestants.
But the tension between
fideism and scientism didn't make sense to me; somehow, the whole cake had to be cut a different way.
The main entry in our Cutting Edge column shows how this relationship, contrary to the apparent monism
not to say
fideism of Professor Ayala the 2010Templeton Prize winner, is related to a proper understanding of the relationship between science and the spiritual.
While the pope labels the paradigm technocratic, the criticism is
not of technology per se, but of an uncritical techno -
fideism — a «blind confidence in technical solutions» — and of the market logic that harnesses it with a single - minded focus on profit, without thinking about the actual goals of human activity.
There is no reason, in principle, that science and religion need to be odds, but the worst of the AGWers do
not simply adopt AGW as a religion, but as the crudest form of
fideism.