Sentences with phrase «not fit the role»

As woman you subconsiously feel guilty for not fitting that role and it can really wear a soul down.

«I'm a politician and I know it's an occupational hazard; sometimes to have your opponents vilify you so I don't take it as anything... I am campaigning and I am saying that we need at this stage of Ghana's history somebody who can bring the country together and my opponent's track record does not fit that role because in his own party, he is not able to bring his people together.

«I'm campaigning and I'm saying that we need at this stage of Ghana's history somebody who can bring the country together and my opponent's track record does not fit that role because in his own party, he is not able to bring his people together.

Not exact matches

Another former employee said that while there are no «right» answers to these questions, there are «appropriate» answers, in the sense that what someone reveals about their thinking and value system either fits or doesn't fit into what is expected of the role in question.

And if getting to know you makes them think you're not a good fit for the role, it's just as well.

Speaking the right language will not only show that you're interested in more than your current role, but it will also demonstrate your intelligence and fit within the company.

There isn't a one - size - fits - all approach for how to set up these emerging roles.

Companies that do this wind up becoming a revolving door, whether it's because prospective employees see the role as a temporary landing pad and are less interested in learning, or because you decide later on that they aren't the right fit.

Sadly, this role was not a good fit.

Fine however, won't let gender play a role in her business strategy advising women to, «build your business how you see fit and be the kind of leader that you think you should be and don't apologize for it... Authentic innovators, no matter their sex, build fantastic businesses and are far more inspiring as leaders.»

I also know it's likely because both were forced into roles they may not neccesarrily fit.

The point is to make a life together, based on your unique circumstances and gifts, not to force yourselves into prescribed roles regardless of how they fit.

But the lack of «fit» between my dad's theology and the choices of others who had a role in planning elements in the worship service were more often than not due to well - intended but theologically unfortunate inclinations.

I could be successful academically and then professionally and bring honor to my family, but I also needed to temper those goals because I needed to be fit to be married, which meant I couldn't be too successful and forget that my role would also include daughter - in - law.

You can hold that a woman is so made that she enters into her sexual identity and so finds a particular fulfillment by giving cooperative support to a male leader, or that she is not; you can hold that a man is so made that he enters into his sexual identity and so finds a particular fulfillment by taking responsibility for a female helper, or that he is not; and you can argue across the board for whichever view of Bible teaching on role relationships fits in with your idea.

At first, the uniform may not fit; we may find ourselves dwarves dressed in the clothing of giants; but we are called to grow into our role.

They did not seem quite fit for their roles.

Although labor unions did not fit the model, they were eventually tolerated and even given a respected role.

If a man has been confined into believing he must adhere to traditional gender roles all his life, he may not be a fit for being a stay at home parent.

It is my view, however, that abandoning the discussion of what a substance is and of whether there is anything that fits this requirement has not removed substance thinking from a dominant role in academia as well as in much of our society.

For example, a «macho» man and very «feminine» woman each fears, represses, and projects onto the other those feelings and tendencies in themselves that don't fit the rigid sex - role stereotypes of their culture.

Despite his own monastic formation, this eloquent preacher to the turbulent, variegated «audiences» of the two Eastern capitals was certain that monks were not the best fitted for the role of priests, but rather those «who, though having their life and conversation among men, yet can preserve their purity, their calm, their piety, and patience, and soberness, and all other good qualities of monks more unbroken and steadfast than those hermits do themselves.»

Losing Mustafi is a blow but we have other centre backs to cover, but that left wing back role is not so easy to fill and maybe the Gunners would revert to a back four with Bellerin and Monreal as the full backs if Kolasinac was not fit.

Unfortunately that is a big question mark following a number of setbacks in recent years, but Arsene Wenger is trying his best not to overuse the creative midfielder, and with any luck his extended time working into his key role will help him to stay fit through - out the campaign.

I don't think there really is any player available right now that will fit that role.

for someone who brags about watching arsenal regularly, u do nt seem to have seen that ramsey had a reduced role last season, was injured and even when fit was surprisingly benched by wenger.

We're not asking him to play centre back which he obviously doesn't have the physique and mentality for the role, we're asking him to do more than he was doing so he fits IN to us, just as much as we adapt to him.

And on top of it he has great technical skill to fit in the mould & not be a simple destroyer just like Kante & maybe more... 5) Now getting both would be too much to ask... specially with our already stacked midfield & with Elneny bright outings since trusted into a bigger role spell good things ahead of next season & with full preseason... even Coquelin is playing less!

Arteta has done what not many players could do — fit and mould into a role he is not really capable of doing.

Whilst there is no denying that Brendan Rodgers could well do with attacking alternatives one would have to wonder how an 6ft 8in forward would fit into the Liverpool's boss's style of play, not least as Andy Carroll was loaned out to West Ham due to his apparent unsuitability for a forward role at the Merseyside club.

You cant escape he fact that Podolski was played rarely and when he was he was played out of position much the same way that Wenger has assembled a squad of players most of which are a talented bunch, but, Wenger has failed to build a team who fit n with each other, we have a midfield that overtly populated with players who al excel in the same role BUT have no solid defensive midfield talent and no options in defence when players have crap periods or are long term injury problems.

Sutton doesn't work with what he has to get the most out of them, he jams them into roles they don't fit.

If Welbeck isn't fit then we have other players who can play the wide right role, Wilshere done well when he has come on and he could do well there for a game, Gnabry is back from injury and may be match fit.

He is clearly not yet 90 - minutes fit, and in the meantime he will play the role of rich man's Alan Gordon, as Josh Guesman long has advocated.

2) No leaders across the pitch: Özil for all the money is no leader but a technically gifted player who can split a defense with an exquisite vision and pass, Sanchez for all the dribbles as the potential but is not there yet, Cazorla will never be in the conversation, Mertesacker is not fit to be one anymore, Coquelin for all the good he has done is too tender and inexperience, Giroud no WC player to assume the role... the only one who can seriously be a leader is Wilshere but unfortunately until he becomes consistent and set the tone with his talent and passion... 3) Mertesacker is a shell of himself and it would be an embarrassment to see him continue to play in his current form, get Gabriel out just for the sake of showing anybody in this team that there's no place for under performers: we paid good money to get him so play him!

Guardiola will undoubtedly look to stamp his mark on the squad this summer, and that will involve selling players who don't fit his style and signing individuals with certain characteristics that can slot in and play the role that he needs.

One thing is for certain in my mind, when both fit, Wilshire is head and shoulders ahead of Ramsey who just doesn't have a football mind or any discipline at all, so he leaves his DM partner exposed when he plays in Santi's role.

Wilshire might actually be a better fit in that role, though he does not score like Ramsey does and Arsenal need goals from the CM position.

Arsenal squad (2014 - 15): Won FA cup Arsenal Squad in summer of 2015: Poldi out, Two goalies out, Flamini is gonna go, Jack Wilshere in injured, Alexis is not match fit, Giroud doesn't know where goal is, Ramsey only loves to scores he forgets his midfield role.

maybe he is not fit for a starring role now but i give him a max of 1 yr and i believe after nxt season he is going to take all you gooners your breaths away

We need really somebody like Cazorla playing, and if he's not going to be fit enough to play, then we must buy a top - quality creative mid-fielder to play his role.

So with Cazorla now fighting for the box - to - box role as well as Rambo and with boith of those and Theo Walcott options on the right, Wilshere not only needs to stay fit, he needs to up his game to have a chance of playing for Arsenal.

I would also not be against starting Chambers at DM for this game; he has earned a spot in the starting 11 but if Koscielny and Mertesacker are both fit to play they should take their starting jobs back; starting Chambers at DM will give him good experience in the role and with our preferred CB pairing behind him he won't have to worry about being perfect in that role.

I'd have focused more on Torres (which I did), the lack of CB depth (I'd prefer to have two quality CBs to back up a 3 back rather than just one with one of the starters being a converted CDM), the lack of players who fit the outside mid role well in this formation (which, hey, maybe that's part of what you were referring to), and the fact that when you play more attackers higher up the pitch, it often requires a team to be able to implement a high pressuring defensive line (Dempsey and Bruin are not suited for that).

I kind of agree with you.If Xhaka is a CM and Ramsey is a CM this means we have to CM's in the centre which I just don't get.This raises questions whether Xhaka's role in the team is well defined.If the likes of Wilshere and Ramsey are fit we must sell before we bring in another CM.Those two are very good but their fitness is a problem.

The United manager admitted yesterday that he only has one fit centre half available for tomorrow's game at West Ham, and many would argue that his injured defenders aren't good enough anyway - playing a striker or a winger in an unfamiliar midfield role ahead of them is not going to help

Although he's played second string to Ibra at psg he is out and out quality and put back in as CF I think he'd fit perfectly and rip it up in EPL I agree totally with need for DM and Krychowiak he's a definite matic for sure, the Coq is good but still needs development and personally I don't rate Arteta in that role

Personally love Elnenny too much, but I just do nt see how he fits in our squad anymore Just a squad player in a role with many squad players already, and even further worsened by the new system

If Carzola was fit, I would have him play the number 10 role in those difficult games not Ozil.

Same could be said for Giroud, look how he got dropped to super sub role last season, Giroud was fit to start most of them and if Wenger love had played a part like you said then Welbeck wouldn't have been given a chance at the end of last season and Giroud would have had a lot more game time.