Sentences with phrase «not follow from»

The result it imposes in that case does not follow from the application of legal rules to the parties» account of the facts or law (which could include the conclusion that the account is frivolous, untrue or unmerited).

55 It should also be noted that, contrary to the submissions of the German and Italian Governments, while the principles stated in the Ruiz Zambrano judgment apply only in exceptional circumstances, it does not follow from the Court's case ‑ law that their application is confined to situations in which there is a blood relationship between the third country national for whom a right of residence is sought and the Union citizen who is a minor from whom that right of residence might be derived.

59 Should that court find that, in the circumstances of the cases before it, such a denial does not follow from the refusals of residence permits at issue in the main proceedings, that would be without prejudice to the question whether, on the basis of other criteria, inter alia by virtue of the right to the protection of family life, Mr O and Mr M could not be refused a right of residence.

Therefore, while EU fundamental rights law encompasses the general principle of non-discrimination, and binds the member states where the national situation at issue falls within the scope of EU law, «it does not follow from this that the scope of Directive 2000/78 should be extended by analogy beyond the discrimination based on the grounds listed exhaustively in Art 1 thereof».

The second is that one of the fundamental goals of a democratic society is finding practical ways to resolve differences where agreement does not follow from debate.

Whilst this did not follow from a natural interpretation of the wording of the legislation, words could be implied into the 1998 Regulations to ensure that they reflected the judgment of the ECtJ.

It does not follow from the fact that an individual takes a vacation, that the individual can not be suffering chronic pain.

It did not follow from the fact that the plumbing had saved lives to begin with that the switch from lead to copper plumbing was not a good move.

However, it should not follow from the fact that optimal choices are unavailable to use that therefore there are no constraints on how to behave at all.

You final sentence does not follow from the evidence supplied so far.

As this suggests, becoming a denialist does not follow from carefully weighing up the evidence (that is, true scepticism) but from associating oneself with a certain cultural outlook and taking on an identity defined in opposition to a caricature of those who support action on climate change.

The implication does not follow from the stated fact.

Perhaps most importantly, engineering research does not follow from (and the blue LED even contradicted!)

If not (and his «buckets» example suggests not) when why does this not follow from Jelbring's theory?

Regardless of whether Mann's participation in Jones» deletion enterprise constituted research misconduct or not, this particular finding of the Inquiry Committee clearly does not follow from the information that they presented in their record.

Relativism does not follow from a post-normal conception of science.

Accepting the assertion that humans are primarily responsible for climate change does not follow from knowing that carbon dioxide is a so - called greenhouse gas.

Even if «climate change is real», it does not follow from it that it is right to treat people in this way.

With these assumptions in mind, my comment is this: it does not follow from these assumptions that any response to climate change is required.

What does not follow from this, however, is Ed's suggestion that «the debate can crucially move on to what action is needed to deal with a warming planet».

No, this does not follow from my reduce vulnerability statement.

First: The second does not follow from the first.

The conclusion that we should try to prevent young people from using e-cigarettes is pretty obvious but this does not follow from the study.»

«Marginalisation of the «less gifted» does not follow from finding genetic influence on educational achievement,» says Plomin.

In fact Brand's argument is a great example of a non sequitur, as one point does not follow from the other.

You said, «You assume that a perfect being can not be relational, but that does not follow from the concept of divine perfection.»

Also, what occurred at Abu Ghraib was not shown to have occurred at any other facility where interrogation was conducted, and so his conclusion that the abuse was «connected to the conduct of interrogations,» which nowhere appears in the Taguba Report, does not follow from the available evidence.

But the process theologians» conclusions do not follow from these premises as they seem to think.

But it does not follow from all this that one can then treat these four equations as a set of simultaneous equations expressing various relationships between the members of the joint class A, B, C, and D. Certainly, the four statements (a), (b), (c), and (d) do not in themselves provide a basis for treating the equations in this way.

As I have indicated earlier, it does not follow from this that it would be appropriate to say that «God does not exist.»

They do not follow from his Kantian anthropocentricity but from his Christian Christocentricity.

However, it does not express White - head's own attitude toward life, and it does not follow from more careful reflection on the metaphysical situation.

However, (10) does not follow from Aristotle's dictum and may obtain even if it does not.

Our enchantment, therefore, does not follow from our rootedness in the larger world as such but only» from certain negative elements in that larger world This point the deconstructionists tend to de-emphasize while Whitehead places it at the heart of his philosophy.

It may well be true that nothing purely private and individual can be called historical — the historical is essentially social — but it does not follow from this that nothing is historical which is not universally witnessed or experienced, even by those who are physically situated to witness or experience it.

Because of that aspect of creativity, there can be no ultimate explanation for the specific characters of things, except their own nature, i.e. their creativity: what they are does not follow from the essence of ultimate Being (as in Spinoza), nor from the ultimate decision of a God.

Any enjoyment that Hitler experienced in genocide was experienced by God too, but it does not follow from this that God wills genocide.

It is not the modern world view which makes Christianity hard to believe, but the Weltanschauung of self - subsistent finitude, which, though connected with that world view, does not follow from it.

Yet I equally hold that the denials in question do not follow from the affirmations and are, in that sense, arbitrary.

Yes children are precious but that does not follow from atheism.

The point is that Christian's proposition that morality does not apply to God does not follow from his argument.

The Christian belief that God is creator does not follow from the acceptance as authoritative of the first chapters of Genesis.

But it does not follow from this that he has become any wiser.

It does not follow from this statistic that sexual problems caused all these divorces.

Another example: it does not follow from belonging to the set of human beings with valid tickets for a particular flight that a given person may properly board that flight.

This claim does not follow from the definition of «duration.»

But it does not follow from this that the disposition can, itself, be simply reduced to the events in and through which it manifests itself.

It does not follow from the decriminalization of suicide (as the Supreme Court seems to imagine) that suicide is morally right, nor was suicide decriminalized because we had decided that it is morally right.

Certainly it does not follow from the decriminalization of suicide that assisted suicide and euthanasia are right.

Or again, it does not follow from this emergent reading of the human situation that the structure of man, that is, «personality,» is dominant and sovereign in value.