Sentences with phrase «not follow that theories»

Always useful to have a new theory on hand that explains why the Earth is decidedly not following the theory of global warming.

Not exact matches

We followed up with Stiglitz after the Davos panel, and he told us that Friedman's assertion «was not based on any economic theory.»

In theory, Occupy was a protest against economic inequality, a reaction not just to the gap between «the 1 %» and «the 99 %,» but to the widening of that gap in the years following the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009.

«But what is the best investment for folks in theory doesn't work unless they can follow it.»

In theory, the following should occur if congress and the President can not pass new legislation to avoid the fiscal cliff:.

Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.

I like to think stuff through and not follow every new idea and theory, which should be distinguished from facts proven scientifically.

The problem, however, is that instead of forcefully challenging all these conclusions — which do not directly and necessarily follow from science or from evolutionary theory — the scientific creationists encourage them.

I did not say that «Hitler was an atheist», I said that his regime followed «science, reason, the theory of evolution, and EUGENICS».

I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).

I don't think you meant what you said in the following statement: «And Not like most of us... Mr. Hawking has not put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything...&raqNot like most of us... Mr. Hawking has not put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything...&raqnot put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything...»

Following your logic, gravity is just a theory, not a fact.

So, no matter how convincing you think evolutionary theory is, it does not follow that it debunks the belief that there is a self - existent creator.

So following scientific theory is you can not reporduce the hypothosis or test it then how can it stand?

I would add, following the example of the best American Catholic «public philosophers» John Courtney Murray and Orestes Brownson, that we should, as loyal Americans [we Porchers and REM fans are all about standing for the place where we live], actually explain why our Fathers built better than they knew — which means criticizing their thinking and affirming [most of] their practice with a theory that at least wasn't completely their own.

Today, more than three hundred years after John Locke spelled out his theory that the greatest good is served by each person following his or her own best interests, some economists and politicians are still trying to bend and stretch this outmoded «explanation» of life to fit social realities that say it just doesn't meet human needs today.

After going into some of the theories of how the evidence about Jesus could have been «tampered» with along the way, he then shows how each theory does not have the evidence to support it, and in the following chapters, goes «link by link» through the chain of custody to show how the Gospel records we have today are an accurate reflection of what was originally written down, and are also an accurate account of what actually happened during the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

These difficulties facing the classical atomic theory are well known: secondary qualities remain inexplicable; no meaning can be given to the notion of an external world outside of the sense organs of the observer; organic time must be reversible — which it is not; we can never choose among hypotheses, since all of our mental states follow «from necessity,» so we don't have theories, but can only report autobiographies, and so on.

It simply does not follow that Hitler's warped interpretation of any scientific theory is something with which a sane human being, scientifically literate or not, would agree.

Although not in itself an argument against the opponent to abortion, nor an argument in favor of infanticide, the following consideration by Hartshorne indicates the counter intuitiveness of the theory of strict identity:

This helps explain why our debt burden has not yet triggered what standard economic theory would dictate: a steep decline in the value of the U.S. dollar followed by a severe contraction of the American economy when we found we could no longer afford the foreign goods we like so much.

Although a moderate theory of evolution is not objected to by the teaching Church at the present time, it does not follow that the theological question is thereby settled and that the whole matter henceforward is a purely scientific one.

Unfortunately, Whitehead did not adequately develop what he meant by peculiar completeness, and the theory of personal identity that follows goes beyond his explicit statements.

Anselm's theory, stated in his classic Cur Deus Homo, runs as follows: because we can not satisfy God's honor, which our sin has violated, Christ volunteered to become human and die for us — thus making good our past disobedience and satisfying our debt to God.

It is worthwhile to listen again to key passages of his letter to Canon J. Walker, which still retain much of their validity: «I do not fear the theory [of Darwin]... It does not seem to me to follow that creation is denied because the Creator, millions of years ago, gave laws to matter.

The universe, life, and physics isn't an accident... there are laws and theories that these things follow.

Otherwise, the experimental results would be one - time reports with no significance beyond isolated experiments, certainly not beyond the domain of the peculiar conditions that do prevail in the experiments Also, were there not an assumption of standard conditions, it would follow that theories would be constructed and confirmed with reference only to peculiar conditions prevailing in particular areas where the experimentation takes place (PR 194f, 499, 502f).

Evolution theory is not a problem and most can see the rabbit hole science likes to follow.

The video criticizes the Obama administration, stating that the use of war does not follow Just War Theory, which has Roman and Catholic influences.

The key to all this is that science does not deal in absolutes there are more supported theories and less supported ones, acceptance within the scientific community follows the most well supported theory.

You said science does not have any idea of how DNA came to be... DNA was NOT the first genetic material on the planet DNA mostly likely came from RNA (auto replicating) this transition from DNA to RNA makes LUCA or the domains bacteria, protists and Archean (depending on which evolutionary theory you are followinnot have any idea of how DNA came to be... DNA was NOT the first genetic material on the planet DNA mostly likely came from RNA (auto replicating) this transition from DNA to RNA makes LUCA or the domains bacteria, protists and Archean (depending on which evolutionary theory you are followinNOT the first genetic material on the planet DNA mostly likely came from RNA (auto replicating) this transition from DNA to RNA makes LUCA or the domains bacteria, protists and Archean (depending on which evolutionary theory you are following).

Following a theory for which there is a mountain of evidence is not following «blindlFollowing a theory for which there is a mountain of evidence is not following «blindlfollowing «blindly».

To convince us that we should, Hartshorne needs to put forward a cogent theory of what «making sense» means, from which it must follow logically that nonsensical ideas can not be actualized.

Realistically, I prefer this to the alternative where Christianity has one central authoritative figure that dictates who is or is not a Christian (although in theory the Catholic church still follows that structure).

Whether particular theories of biological evolution stand or fall would not affect this basic perspective, or arguments and insights that follow from this.

We emphasize that we do not decide that a state «mandated statement violates the Constitution simply because it disclaims any intent to communicate to students that the theory of evolution is the only accepted explanation of the origin of life, informs students of their right to follow their religious principles, and encourages students to evaluate all explanations of life's origins, including those taught outside the classroom.

The Adam theory says man was made perfect and would not have died if not for the eating of the fruit, so according to the bible Adam would be alive today if he hadn't given in to Eve's pressure, as would all following humans had sin not entered into our DNA and passed death on to Adams children.

But even the most complicated conspiracy theories didn't get at the change in the American consciousness quite the way King did when he kicked off his career by having a girl named Carrie destroy her high school with telekinesis and followed it up with vampires devouring a small Maine town.

You say that Science has disproved stories from the Bible, well Scientists once said that there was an edge of the world and you would fall off of it if you went to the edge... they said that the Earth was the center of the universe and that the sun revolved around us... You are all so quick to throw out Christianity because you think 1 story doesn't make sense to you and couldn't have happened how it says in the Bible, yet so willing to follow scientists that constantly revise their theories and change what you inevitably believe.

I follow the science being done at CERN and am fascinated at how many theories are being proven valid, not to mention the amazing discoveries by the NASA Space Program.

Or it isn't a foul in theory, because a fake - punt - turned - pass - followed - by - pass - interference play had never actually occurred in Hochuli's lifetime of officiating, which now includes more than 450 NFL games.

Like most betting strategies, the Zig - Zag Theory should not be followed blindly.

Many parents — both those who follow his program and those who don't — would likely be surprised at some of the lesser - known points of his theory.

In the context of attachment theory, the hypothesis that single people as a group are more secure does not follow.

We don't need abstract, we don't need theory, we need: «here are the following fifteen things that need to be done immediately,» and then we'll take the next step.»

Following tumultuous court proceedings where Scondo, the owner of a comic book store, hurled accusations of a conspiracy theory, the Board decided it's not going to happen.

Speaking to BBC Radio Five Live following his election, Murphy said that while he disagreed with the «branch office» theory, he would not be consulting London on policy:» [t] he days in which anyone needed permission from the Labour Party anywhere else in the United Kingdom to make a decision about what happens in Scotland are gone and they're gone for good.»

Einstein's moral clarity, his insistence that we should accept nothing less than a theory that gives a completely coherent account of individual phenomena, can not be followed unless we reject almost all contemporary theoretical physics as insufficient.

Using this integrated approach, the authors revealed a new biological phenomenon, in which water motions do not follow the classical enzymatic theory, but generate long - lasting protein - water motions that last longer than a single catalytic cycle.

In the spirit of Gödel's proof, Hawking considers the following statement: This statement about the universe can not be proved within the theory of everything.