Sentences with phrase «not general courses»

Not exact matches

What's most interesting about the games, of course, isn't the general precepts, it's the details.

It's a good idea to have a decent serving of protein post-workout (at least 25g) but it's much less important than just eating enough protein over the course of the day in general so don't get too hung up on it if you schedule doesn't permit this.

Of course, to give credit where it's also due, it doesn't hurt to have general manager Theo the Brainiac extending a string of increasing wins per season (61, 66, 73 and 100 and counting) for five straight years.

Two and a half years into the mandate and no real result on the election promise.This sort of thing is par for the course, though.A tactic played over and over which the general public doesn't seem to be able to grasp.

The Secretary - General of the United Nations, Mr. Ban Ki - moon, officially opened the event by stating «The world can not continue on the current course.

Of course, the reality is that the U.S. economy isn't driven entirely by what the president or the government in general does.

HubSpot, for example, might not (depending on our analytics, of course) want to choose «inbound marketing» as a topic for a blog bundle; not only is it far too broad to be helpful, but perhaps leads that download content about inbound marketing as a general concept don't close at a very high rate.

Of course, given that God does exists, he wouldn't bother to appear to you for this general reason.

It's all contestable, of course, but Catholics do not seem, in general, to experience a tremendous personal encounter when they receive the body and blood of our Lord.

(Of course, I was focusing on the destructive elements of professional football, not condemning sport in general.)

These rather general remarks do not prove anything, of course; they only suggest one must live in an Aristotelian world to draw genetic successiveness so close to physical time as to call both time.

first, it is effected without any distortion or disruption of any particular determinism: for events are not, in general, deflected from their course of prayer but are integrated into a new arrangement of the totality of forces;

Of course, Wesley would also be critical of many forms of liberalism, but it is important that today's evangelicals not read their opposition to liberalism in general back into Wesley.

For example, the Bible says that time was created by God when He created the universe.19 Stephen Hawking, George Ellis, and Roger Penrose extended the equations for general relativity to include space and time, demonstrating that time began at the formation of the universe.20 Of course, the biggest coup of the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determination.

Of course, what she means is that they are valid as general guiding principles; but not always easily applied in specific concrete circumstances.

Of course there is a measure of ideological hype in such statements, but one can not help but be impressed with, for instance, the proposal that there should be a second chamber of the UN's General Assembly — a People's Assembly.

Not, of course, that Catholics and Orthodox don't have problems, but at least they have more plausibly institutionalized the general theory expounded by Hauerwas.

While I didn't disagree with the general sentiments — of course jealously and selfishness are wrong!

First of all, we should observe that Peirce believed his thesis that there is spontaneity to be explanatory of «the general fact of irregularity, though not, of course, what each lawless event is to be.»

From the ten year course in which Principia was produced, Whitehead retained not only the emphasis on its procedure but also its general aim of producing a universal system of thought.

In general, Jesus directed his attention to people of Jewish faith, members of the synagogue communities — that they were, of course, race - pure Jews can not be asserted in regard to Galilee, as has been shown (pp.

The general population to include many of the voters in California find g - ay s - exual activities, «unionized» or not, to be unusual and typically as - sociate such activity with the spread of AIDS which is of course wrong.

For of course it is not a question of an object but of the primordial causal condition of the very possibility of cognition in general, and so of the possibility of the operation of any actual final causality.

Of course, all process thinkers, including historical process thinkers, including historical process thinkers, inevitably assume a general cosmology, even if they choose not to focus on it and to keep it always tentative.

There are exceptions, of course, but the general picture seems not to be encouraging.

Such a system had serious drawbacks because the teaching materials were several centuries old, the study of Arabic — and no Chinese — was inadequate, so the students could read only a limited amount and could not speak the language, there was no general educational background for the religious courses, and the freedom allowed to the students often led them to form bad habits.

The general reason for the inquiry is to be found, of course, in the conviction that «the unexamined life is not worth living» — a principle that has been given a special form in the Christian demand for daily and lifelong repentance.

Of course, film, in particular, and pop culture, in general, have a long history of pushing the envelope, which isn't always a bad thing.

I wouldn't even consider that now, of course, (as it would be an unintended mockery) but I still think Biblical literacy is good for literary purposes in general and critical for anyone who claims to base their lives on the book.

Or if you take «paying the penalty,» not in the sense of being punished, but in the more general sense of «standing the racket» or «footing the bill,» then, of course, it is a matter of common experience that, when one person has got himself into a hole, the trouble of getting him out usually falls on a kind friend.

This open - endedness of Whiteheadian thought is, of course, in seeming conflict with the terminal nature of Teilhard's vision, not to mention the thought of that vast number of Christian thinkers, contemporary as well as past, for whom an evolutionary / processive view of Christian doctrine in general is not viable.

Some work has been done in India, courses have been offered in religions other than Buddhism in Ceylon, there was a chair of comparative religions for a time in Turkey, but in general the scholars of Asia have not turned to a study of religions other than their own.

Of course not but to the general heteros - exual population it is yucky, unusual and not normal to them.

They usually take place outside the Divinity School, and they are intended, not for specialists in religious studies of any kind, but for a general audience of people, mainly, but by no means exclusively, undergraduate, whose courses of study may lie in other fields, but who are interested in listening to a non-technical presentation of questions with which theologians are concerned and perhaps also in taking part in discussions which are arranged to follow the lectures.

Of course, such an idea could not hope to be a blueprint for every theological school, but only «a kind of general prescription of the elements every blueprint would need to provide for» (106).

There is no reason for us to reject the possibility that in a similar way the chaotic and monotonous episodes of all experience, ours as well as nature's in general, may also contribute to the value of the whole when viewed from a cosmic perspective (to which of course we do not ourselves have access).

Newton was not orthodox in his theology and, of course, we do not need a supernatural mediator to describe gravity — Einstein's General Relativity will suffice — but the supernatural and the natural / physical are correlative in the Faith theology.

This stage may not be capable of precise definitions, but when it is fully reached the younger may be regarded as passing out of the domain of «Missions» and its future course lies in the region of general Church history.7

Of course, as economists know, homo economicus is an abstraction, but we can not think of human beings in general without abstraction.

Such an impression will of course be misleading, the consequence of taking the printed record too seriously, and it will not be total: Here and there in the general excited buzz, there will be visible an outcrop of the unchanging reality beneath, some out - of - date old cleric still raising a stubborn voice about the love of God, the burden of sin, the pain of Christ, the love of our neighbor, the pilgrimage of this life, and the Four Last Things.

Since nearly all of my Bible Institute work was in religion and I needed general education subjects for graduation, I hold a baccalaureate in religion from a college at which I did not take a single course in the field.

Many of the state colleges and universities do not offer instruction in religion, while some of them provide courses dealing with the Bible, general surveys of religions of the world, and philosophical and ethical concepts of the Judeo - Christian traditions.

And I freely admit I sometimes use too many extraneous, space - consuming, overly - descriptive, qualifying, words or sentences written quickly and in a stream - of - conscientiousness, run - on sort of fashion with occasional typos mostly due to fatigue of being up way too late (which also explains this post in general) after a long day of political discussion which refreshingly had little religious content though of course there is often much overlap between the two but posting is barely a hobby but more of an occasional passtime so now i wonder if what I write could be considered abuse as I've can't really recall seeing much if any sorrt of «text filibustering» not that this is exactly filibustering more a spontaneous text performance response joke and meant in jest to be absurdly long and useless so of course i hope you appreciate the spirit.

Of course, this does not amount to proof of his general hypothesis, much less of his metaphysics.

In a few cases this will undoubtedly be true, but if the general run of readers of the book — and it is not designed for specialists in the field — are anything at all like the students who, across the years, have enrolled in the writer's courses in the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detailed.

Of course it is not said as general truth, but with reference to the Kingdom of God; hence the question, «How shall we liken the Kingdom of God?

I didn't document and shoot photos of every dish I created (though more of them went on instagram), but I noticed my meals across the course of a day typically followed a general pattern.

I don't know about you but when it comes to Halloween (or holiday seasons in general) I like to have a little bit of fun and indulge — but always on my own homemade treats of course.

Of course sometimes that doesn't happen but in general, this season I've done that.

Of course we would play CL without his diva non sense last year... Should have wait season to be over before to ask to go, no respect for fans, team, meaning football in general; that's why he is not on list, no other reasons..