I think the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP) can
not get any more votes than they got this last time because there is no way that they can spend the same amount again on campaigning for the second round.
Not exact matches
And we organized «
get out the
vote» efforts that helped
more than 2 million people register to
vote who might
not have
voted otherwise.
I'd feel a bit better if they were going to use the revenue to expand our economy so we aren't just resource based, but governments see a way to
get more so they can spend it buying
votes.
And you may
vote a certain way or
not but that doesn't matter, you've
got 27,000 employees and I think the fact is that you're operating under a Federal Trade Commission consent decree from 2011, that's a real thing and it goes for twenty years so when someone said «do we need
more regulations, do we need
more legislation?»
I have always said that there must only be one standard to government decision making — what makes Canada
more prosperous —
not what
gets more votes.
Romney won't
get my
vote, but he at least seems reasonably normal and will look better and better the
more he stands next to any of those three.
You must
not be paying attention to
not only how people will be
voting, but / and even
more importantly the people (especially the hyper - religious) that are running for and
getting voted into office are with zealotry... attempting, and in some cases passing laws that are based on their «religious beliefs.»
I don't know if it's ever occurred to any of speakers that all those kids are someday going to
vote, or might have to figure out their change at the Taco Bell if the computer goes down, or might be passing out pills in the rest home, so the better schooling those kids
get now, the
more helpful they'll be to them in the future.
i don't think it will pass but its just about
getting it in the headlines... the next bill will be
more to the point and far
more misunderstood so it make really make it past the
vote.
To finish, religion and government should be completely separated, religion should be private and should
not be discussed / debated to
get more votes and they should stick to what really matters which is
getting the economy back on track,
getting people jobs, and
getting corruption out of businesses / government.
They both belive when they die they well have, meet there 7 wives in heven u think that's
not a cult?if america
votes in a CULT member to run our country the gates of hell well open and we better be ready america.so america there is 2 of them I for one am
not well to go back 150 yrs.6 on one off mentality.I grew up around those people and they r sick like the musliums they wear grab also but they hide there's under there clothes.what
more r they hiding plenty.ask them how many times they r babtized
not in there they take someone elses name everytime they
get diped that is why there cult is so big ask one and they well lie or come up with even a bigger lie.they need to be fully investagated ppl.don't let the deep pockets and smile fool u.
They're targeting a large swath of the population who is normally
not politically engaged enough to
vote in non-presidential elections, but has been much
more politically engaged since Trump
got elected.
There are four
more voting updates to go, and now that Giants» have seen that their efforts haven't been enough, maybe they'll try harder to
get Nori Aoki to Cincinnati for the July 14 All - Star Game.
Me asking why Seo would be preferred to play on the right rather than left
got more up
votes than down and considering I
get down
votes for my arrogance... I would
not say the question I asked is clear for everyone, or if it is then it is in favor of what I asked.
I
voted for Alexis why, cos 1) he runs around too much without an end product most times 2) his game is
more readable by most defenders now 3) if he's all that, why did Barca
get rid of him 4) his interlink play is
not that good 5) he gives the ball away far too often 6) too independent really -
not much of a team man
Getting Congress to act the adult, to
vote in the best interests of children, shouldn't be an even
more daunting task.
I guess Obama and Sebellius can make the Affordable Health Care Act
more affordable by denying such care to these unfortunates to
get them to die young and wipe them off the slates completely — the burden of keeping them alive to age 18 to glean another Democrat
vote deemed
not «cost effective».
oh sorry I need
more than one
vote, they are all amazing and I really can
not choose so if I have
got to put them in order I choose No 2 then 18 then 4 then 10 then19...... ok so I had better stop and if it really has to be only one
vote then its
got to be No2.
Though, if it were some measure generally opposed by the ruling majority and there were enough defections, then the missing 7
votes would have
more of an impact on something
not getting passed.
We also have mandatory
voting, so that the winner isn't decided by «who can
get more people to
vote», nor by voter suppression techniques.
It is very difficult for third parties to make any kind of progress in first past the post systems, as few people will be willing to
vote for a third party when that means they don't
get to express their choice about the
more dominant parties.
Background: Over the recent months of observing different campaigns for presidential election in the U.S. and their one - sided views on everything, I
got to the point of thinking that indirect
vote by representatives of the people is
not working any
more.
The Wilson Pakula threshold for anyone
not enrolled in the party who wants to run on the line, as you'll recall, is just over 50 percent of the weighted convention
vote —
more than twice the 25 percent necessary for party members to
get onto the ballot.
And we didn't
get it Daniel Wesangula Read
more Most of Kenya has remained calm since the
vote, but several people have been shot and killed in clashes between police and opposition supporters in poor neighbourhoods in Nairobi, as well as in the western city of Kisumu
You wouldn't claim people
get more votes under other forms of runoff
voting (two round system or exhaustive ballot for example).
They don't
get two
votes, Paul, because their first
vote is discarded, it doesn't count any
more.
We shouldn't be surprised then that campaign spending — which largely operates on turnout — has
more effect for candidates whose voters require a little
more persuasion to
get out and
vote, than those who will turnout regardless.
As the electorate becomes
more and
more fractured, small extremist parties might
not actually grow in size (the voter base for extreme views remains the same), but the need to
get that last one or two
votes to build a majority coalition becomes greater and greater, making the negotiating position of extreme parties much greater, and allowing them to force their platforms onto the coalition in exchange for their
vote.
When the Tories
got destroyed in 1997 (with
more votes than Labour
got in 2010) Tory activists didn't plan to force the elected government to back down from pursuing its agenda.
«I assume the Assembly will
not designate someone, other than maybe a placeholder, unless they
get more than 50 percent of the
vote at the meeting,» Jacobs said.
«And that means you can ensure there is stable government but you can still
vote according to your principles... that might mean that you don't
get the ministerial car but it would mean you could sleep a little
more comfortably at night.»
What I don't
get is why did they win when under the party totals, Labor clearly had nearly 800,000
more votes in the party totals as compared to the Liberal National Party?
I don't put much store in opinion polls, but if true it would only indicate roughly what you would expect to happen at this point in the parliament - 32 % isn't that much lower than Labour
got in the 2005 General Election and all it would suggest is that the Liberal Democrats are having a reversal - tactical
voting could see them holding onto many of their current seats, indeed it is even possible that if they
got 17 % of the
vote that if it focused in an area that they could actually end up with
more seats, where the switches in support are occuring is crucial - if they are focused then if the Conservative Party were to
get 39 % then it might still result in them
getting fewer seats than Labour or in extremis winning a 150 seat majority or so?
«Technicality she [Vazquez]
got more votes than every candidate that ran and a lot were
not duplicates — they
voted for one or the other,» according to a source familiar with the situation.
I don't see how Labour could accept second place to the Lib Dems if it
gets more votes as well as seats.
Lancman and Avella said they will push legislation in Albany to reform the
voting process, including allowing college students to be election inspectors even if they do
not live in Queens, which is currently mandated, in order to
get younger people who are
more adept at technology working in elections.
The public was demanding
more, we were told, assuming away the significant number of people who
voted for UKIP simply to
get one over on the establishment parties or who may have
voted on an aspect of UKIPs policy that doesn't involve the EU.
I might have taken a swing at it if I didn't observe that fact - based but politically polarizing answers on this SE
get voted on by political alignment
more than quality.
The answer for the losing parties is to work harder to win
more votes -
not to demand that their voters
get more votes,
more bites of the cherry, than anyone else.
But it does happen and
more often then
not, its when the popular party
gets so cocky that they feel they can nominate any lousy candidate they want and still have enough
votes to hold the safe state.
While Asian - Americans historically have faced
voting barriers and discrimination, our goal is
not solely to
get more minority candidates elected.
But
more senior figures in Tory Brexit camp backed Cameron and insisted a confidence
vote would
not happen because the rebels would
not get enough support.
With just two
more full days before the ballots are set to be counted, most PEF members who plan to
vote have probably returned their ballots: If
not they risk missing the 9 a.m. Thursday deadline (the association
gets a morning mail delivery).
«If I had
gotten [six]
more votes, I wouldn't have considered the town board,» said MacIsaac.
Republican operatives concede that Cochran failed to deploy technology in any meaningful way during the early June primary, when McDaniel led by
more than 1,300
votes but couldn't
get the nomination outright because he didn't have a 50 percent majority.
«Bill de Blasio wants Melissa Mark - Viverito to
get as many
votes as possible so that he can claim
not only a win but a huge mandate and have even
more leverage and power to push his agenda and diminish the power of critics and skeptics,» said one labor insider.
Labour are also doing worse the better they did in 2010, but mainly because they are
getting more Liberal Democrat
votes where they started weaker and
not so much because they are shedding
votes to UKIP
more where they started stronger.
More worryingly for May, Tory grandee Nicholas Soames also posted on Twitter: «It really won't be enough to
get people to
vote against The Corbini.
She did
get 10 million
more votes, don't like it?
The bill was also
getting more and
more unpopular as the «debate» went on and
got uglier and it started becoming apparent that anyone who
voted for the bill that wasn't in a totally safe district would face major challenges in reelection bids, especially for republicans, for supporting the bill, so passing fast there was hope that the public's short memory would forget the worst transgressions.