Fine then stop giving them tax dollars again all this will do is force them to close because they will
not go against their beliefs, which means less health care available which we are going to need desperately.
Not exact matches
Interesting topic... I struggle with this idea because like most people that I imagine read your blog, I earned the money... creating a legacy of family who does
not have to provide for themselves
goes against my core
beliefs.
When someone calls that Imam one of the most evil people on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to
go out because they will be attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching
against Muslims (as opposed to the
belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.
Employees also pay as well, of course, but what we have here is a company, under the policies approved
not just be the CEO but by the board, that is being forced to pay for something that
goes against their
beliefs.
This could be a referance to that
belief and God could be simply saying «I know all and therefore I know that Pharaoh will
not let my people
go unless I do these things, but because he is
against me I will (in a sense) harden his heart on my scale and he will
not be in my afterlife.
The majority of christians have no idea about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout nonsense from a bible they have never read and judge or even hate others who do
not believe their
beliefs, all the while
not knowing they are
going against its teachings.
Restricting one group's
belief system from being represented is
not fair to non Christian religions and
goes against everything the founding fathers represented.
It doesn't work to fight
against them about their
belief, to make them wonder if we are safe (and considering several of us have kids in schools now) or if we are
going to do something
against them.
In September, the Greens filed a lawsuit
against the federal government, stating, «These abortion - causing drugs
go against our faith... We simply can
not abandon our religious
beliefs to comply with this mandate.»
However we as Christians can
not be required to teach what
goes against our
beliefs.
Bottom line, it is un-american to
go against a people based on
belief, when said orginization has
not directly harmed anyone.its a
belief that this country was founded on.
Therefore, criticizing the Pope for his words it is
not only ridiculous, it
goes AGAINST our
beliefs.
In closing Bill Nye the Science Guy... you can
not tell parents to
go against and
not teach their kids, the traditional
beliefs that have been handed down from generation to generation because it
goes against what you believe.
If the Christians that served in the crusades really knew what was
going on, they probably wouldn't have served, however, the leaders of the time used their
beliefs against them and got them to fight for what they called a «holy war.»
He should have known better that you can't continue as part of an organization if you are publicly
going against their core
beliefs and practices.
The results scientists obtain may
not be what they expected, and may even
go against their previous
beliefs.
Yet, instead of believing in a Creator and Intelligent Design, you, the science and fact believer,
go against the very basic rules of your same scientific
beliefs and claim the Universe was
NOT created, it just poofed into existence from nothing.
Isn't it interesting how angry the militant atheist crowd becomes when a ruling
goes against their «
beliefs»???
Isn't it interesting how angry the militant Christian crowd becomes when a ruling
goes against their «
beliefs» like for gay rights and abortion???
While both parties may be influenced by religion, one party moreso than another relies more heavily on that; because of that reliance that party essentially CA
N'T do anything positive for gay people because it would
go against their religious
beliefs.
Should be banned just the same as advertising Jesus and God can't be shoved out there because your political correctness just can't
go against someone's
beliefs.
Obama has no right to dictate to a private organization what they can or can
not do especially if it
goes against their religious
beliefs.
It still doesn't negate the fact that the RCC has religious
beliefs and is being FORCED by the government to
go against them.
It's
not right to demand that they
go against their
beliefs and offer a quality of life drug that doesn't treat or prevent an illness.
You can
not force a religion to
go against their
belief, no should any president be allowed to do so.
This is what they believe they shouldn't have to change or
go against their
beliefs if it is a Catholic Hospital.
BRC, I do understand fully, what I think you don't understand by having that clause in their employees insurance policy, they feel that they are aiding a person to get contraceptives or an abortion which to them is the same thing as
going against their
beliefs.
I have a problem with people imposing their
beliefs on others and saying «this is the way it is and there is no other way»... I have a big problem with creationists who
go against science and the proof of evolution, but I also have a big problem with people demanding that there is no God on people when it is yet to be proved, and will probably never be proved, that there is in fact,
not a God.
When what a person sees
goes against what they believe they can
not continue to hold that
belief, and it is nothing but dishonesty to attempt to change it after the fact as if they believed that all along in the first place.
It is
NOT right for the government to force ANYONE to
go against their
beliefs.
Mo one is saying that employees can't use contraceptives, just don't make the employer pay for them when it
goes against their
belief, it should be up to the business.
i think this could officially be the start of the end for wenger his blind arrogance has cause him to buy welbeck in the sheer
belief that
AGAINST THE ODDS HE CAN BEAT THE REST OF THE BIG 4 WITH ONE ARM BEHIND HIS BACK we should be buying top top top european c / l standard players
not sunderland spuds everton standard players thats about welbecks standard of club in all truthful reality he is an honest hard working player but wenger thinks he can coach the mediocrity out of him he is truely insane its a guaranteed source of goals we need
not more fancy hold up play and «pace» and missing chance after chance so the postman is to be joined by the manchester metro tram absolute disgrace he has kidded on ozil and sanchez they must be wondering what is
going on atm they are seeing the true wenger now just panicking and
not panicking very well to that effect and for some reason wenger has
gone all kinky for english players for some strange reason at least chambers has great potential welbeck has past that stage and is a seasoned pro now and he is no where near what we need wenger is trying to show how great he is by whiping the back out of the same players week after week in the vain hope that he can win the league without rotating ever and they will get injured and he wont have learned his lesson and we will pay for it in the end best last day transfer would have been a 4 year contract for klopp
I say we forget him and
go into the game with the
belief that we need to win this match
against chelsea
not we need to win
against mou... hopefully the boys will give their best am sure.
«We have to organise that the players who
go forward [
against Chelsea] do so with 100 per cent
belief and the players who do
not go protect us from being caught on the counter-attack.
Oldham infer in the statement their
belief that signing Evans would still have been the right move and were it
not for threats made
against the club they would have
gone ahead with the deal.
It was definitely a game of two halfs
against Watford, So lets
not kid ourselves with premature
belief's that we are
going to challenge City, Utd and Chelsea for the title.
The good thing in football, though, is that you can bounce back straight away with this game
against QPR.Everyone was angry and disappointed after the [Norwich] game, there's no hiding from that and I'm
not going to tell you differently, But there is spirit and
belief in this squad and we've shown that when we play to our full potential we can beat anyone in the world.I genuinely believe that.
The point is when I am faced with someone that is insulting the choices I have made or giving unsolicited advice that
goes against my
beliefs, I don't need to cower in shame.
It's
not easy, because it
goes against a tidal wave of generations of cultural
beliefs and myths.
On Monday, the head of the Catholic church in England and Wales, Cardinal Cormac Murphy - O'Connor, warned church - run adoption agencies could
not adhere to the new rules as it would
go against their «conscience» and
belief that homosexuality is wrong.
Heastie characterized some member's opposition as a «core principle» for some Democrats, and he says he won't ask them to
go against their core
beliefs to vote for any measure.
«The ever greater centralisation of power beyond the democratic control of the people is
not in keeping with the needs of the twenty - first century; it is
against the spirit of our age; it diminishes our ability to pursue our own global relationships, and in its lack of accountability and legitimacy it
goes against our fundamental
belief that people should only be led and governed with their consent.»
The clock ambiguity
goes against not just the Newtonian
belief in universal law, but the even more deeply held faith in law itself — in the idea that nature is guided by timeless rules that can be described in mathematical terms.
Not only would jeans every day make for a boring blog it would
go against my
belief to dress nicely so you feel better.
You are forced to pay over $ 1,000 a year to an organization that you think
not only doesn't represent you but frequently
goes against many of your core
beliefs.
So, the union forcibly takes money from teachers and spends much of it in a way that
not only hurts children, but also
goes against the political
beliefs of many of its members.
«We are struggling
against belief systems such as «fix the kids,
not the schools» and expectations that
go along with poverty.
I will
not read stuff that
go against my personal
beliefs.
«While interests on both sides of the issue will debate the relevance of the manipulated or otherwise omitted data, these revelations undermine confidence in the scientific data driving the climate change debates, WHICH IS WHAT WE WANT, AND WHICH I DO
N'T WANT, AS IT
GOES AGAINST MY DEEPLY - HELD
BELIEFS»
People don't question Daily Mail when they run articles on Islam, they only do when they
go against their other
beliefs.