Sentences with phrase «not go into labour»

I secretly think my body will not go into labour until that bathroom is fixed.

This time round, although I had some Braxton Hicks contractions as early as 34 weeks, I didn't go into labour earlier and so was able to arrive at the hospital on the scheduled date in a calm state of mind for the surgery.

Not exact matches

The bread «which earth has given and human hands have made» represents the work that has gone into the making of the bread; not only the work of the farmer and the miller but the work of industry, of man's labour in the office, in the factory, or in the surgery.

(Actually it's less because that number includes deaths associated with pregnancy generally, and she's survived that long enough to go into labour, but the number is small enough that it doesn't matter much.)

You may not have met any of these midwives or doctors before going into labour.

When my older children announced that they didn't want to be packed off when I went into labour, and the midwives were happy for them to be around, I knew I should try and prepare them for birth at home.

I had the antibiotic on standby, and planned with my midwife that I would wait for another risk factor to turn up before they would be administered - ie go into labour before 37wks (didn't) waters broken for more than 18hours before birth (with my little rocket?

My gynae says they were excellent weights and it's a good thing we didn't wait any longer for them to be born because I would've gone into labour.

I will gladly follow your goal, I have to do something too, as my weight now is almost the same as when I went into labour with my twins, and I am not pregnant this time.....

I want to try to stay strong, just keep an eye on the baby and let him do his own thing, but I'm so scared that my body just might never go into labour on it's own — it's hard to make a decision when I feel like I don't have all the information.

Hormonal and can choose or not tell whoever when you go into labour.

Do they really think the public will go into the polling booth thinking «oh well I would vote for Labour but they can't be trusted on the economy, and I would vote for the Conservatives but they might deliver the wrong kind of recovery, so I think I will marry economic efficiency and social justice and vote for the Liberal Democrats instead»?

Since Labour went into the general election arguing that the issue of whether or not Britain was leaving the EU was settled by last year's referendum she urged colleagues not to «change tack».

«Where Labour needs to learn lessons is that twice now — and I say this with no personal animosity to either, I respect them both greatly, they're remarkable people — but twice in a row now we've gone into a general election campaign with leaders that we knew to be unpopular with the public, and people weren't prepared to speak out, and when they did they were attacked for disunity,» he says.

And the Lib Dems would be out of their minds to go into coalition before the election — «vote Lib Dem, get Labour» did for them in 1992, and it wasn't even true then.

While the right of the party have lectured Corbyn and the left for the past year about talking - down to voters, being «out of touch» and not understanding ordinary people's views, here Smith is saying he believes Labour should go into the 2020 election telling the 52 % of Leave voters they are simply wrong.

Simon can not be the «most senior Lib Dem MP outside Parliament» and the party didn't go «into a deal with Labour».

In addition it was increasingly clear during the negotiations that many senior members of the Labour party did not want a coalition with us and preferred the option of going into opposition.

A former adviser to Denis Healey and Gerald Kaufman, Richard Heller in 1998 published «Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night», to warn Labour against the euro.

He added: «I would want him to stay on and be the home secretary when we go into power because I think he is such a tremendous asset for the Labour Party, but I know how dedicated he is not just to his constituency, but how he has been a dedicated advocate for the North as well.

These moves aren't going to turn Labour into a mass party overnight, but they do create the conditions where this is possible again.

The campaign is not only based on extremely weak arguments but also on the idea that Labour should go into the next election saying «We believe not only that free movement should be possible with the countries with which we have the closest economic ties but also from every where else in the world.

The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.

Come 2015 or whenever the next election is, Labour isn't going to go into the election pledging to spend # 1 billion on giving cash handouts to the richest 15 % of families, and in a fortnight there are # 12 billion in welfare cuts plus untold billions more in cutting public services which will be higher priorities to oppose and pledge to reverse.

But according to the Sun she was turned away as she didn't have the correct paperwork and ended up going into labour on a flight from Chicago to Heathrow on her journey home.

«Labour will not go into coalition with the SNP.

«The Liberals have walked away from progressive politics» — Not what Blair, Blunkett, Straw, Reid, Burnham, Abbot, Harris or the half dozen others said at the time; they said you shouldn't make a deal and that it was better for Labour to go into opposition.

Labour goes into the election with 34 % to 36 % locked up - not so far away from being the largest party.

He came out too slowly, he was very half - hearted about his attempts to campaign and Labour voters simply didn't get the message and we're now moving into a really tumultuous time, there are going to be really difficult decisions to be taken on behalf of the British people.

He formed an alliance with Chuka Umunna at shadow BIS to block Labour from going into the election supporting a referendum (it feels relevant at this point to note that this was because Alexander believed that Labour was not in the right shape to win a referendum after decades of built - up anti-immigration sentiment).

The speech did not go into any policy specifics, except to mention historic Labour policies that she is proud of «from the NHS to the minimum wage to the equality legislation».

And a Labour - Lib Dem deal probably couldn't happen either, once the government has gone into an election with a Commons majority and come back having lost it.

He couldn't have gone into the next election as Labour's future Chancellor, as his recent bungles with figures demonstrated, but the resignation doesn't look to have been forced by Labour's leader to sort the problem now.

The prime minister does not go as far as the Labour leader, who has said the whole incursion into Gaza is wrong, or Nick Clegg, who has said Israel's actions appear to be a disproportionate act of collective punishment and called for talks with Hamas.

Not so long ago, I asked a very senior Lib Dem to name the single largest obstacle to his party going into government with Labour.

then the unions need to put their oen candidates forward has most of this party has we now isnt a true labour party but sadly who do you vote for has its more the same i cant see a way forward but you state the monies from the election 1997 then this must haver been tory money has blair was maggies product put into lanour to take em to the tory lite whot ever i can not in all my days say to my friends vote for them has untill the tb of this party go back to their tory party jeff3

It was clear that if we went into coalition with Labour, we would not be establishing a new government, we would be chaining ourselves to a decaying corpse.

There is so much convergence, in fact, that the Lib Dems» problem with going into government with Labour might be not be the number of disagreements, but the absence of them.

I suspect when you state people are going for the nationalist then state Plaid your not taking into account the mess Plaid made going into coalition with Welsh Labour, they like the Liberals became the mouth piece for Labour forgetting everything people had voted for them.

D'Ancona writes: «After one meeting of the party leaders in which the Labour leader had moralised a little too much, Clegg turned to Cameron and said: «Now you can see why I don't want to go into coalition with him».»

I thought the ballot would allow Brown to be deselected at the next party conference, but I'm not sure how the labour party democracy works Could that mean that effectively the Labour Party could go into the next election with a caretaker until that conference takes labour party democracy works Could that mean that effectively the Labour Party could go into the next election with a caretaker until that conference takes Labour Party could go into the next election with a caretaker until that conference takes place?

He writes: «It was clear that if we went into coalition with Labour, we would not be establishing a new government, we would be chaining ourselves to a decaying corpse.

If the agreement on party funding isn't also implemented at this point, then Labour will go into the next election either: having to ask the unions for enormous discretionary donations to fund the campaign, rendering pointless the process started yesterday, or fighting an election with a fraction of the funds available to the Tories.

Then, as if things were not going badly enough for Corbyn, there was last Friday's launch of the Shami Chakrabarti report into anti-Semitism in the Labour party.

If I didn't believe that, I would make a point and go into the lobby with Labour.»

If you want to escape the insidious spread of UKIP thinking, go to London and the metropolitan cities where immigration has not only enriched out lives, but also brought fresh layers into the Labour Party, fighting on class politics and winning seats galore in last May's local elections.

The SNP have already clearly stated (repeatedly) they will not go into coalition with Labour.

During his doomed leadership contest David Miliband said Labour could not afford to go into the 2015 general election with no business support.

JON SOPEL: Now you went into the last election, the Labour Party did with a very clear manifesto and unless I'm very much mistaken I don't think there was any reference to nationalising key parts of the industrial and financial sectors, getting rid of nuclear weapons, slashing defence spending and higher tax rates for the better off?

Wouldn't matter who won the leadership just gone nor does it matter who leads Labour into GE2020 — there is simply no way they would win it.