The credit supply should take increasingly the form of private debt,
not government debt.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are
not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance
debt, including our ability to obtain the
debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other
governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may
not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign
government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Fill the bulk of your portfolio with a combination of high - rated bonds (weighted toward corporate, rather than
government,
debt) and high - quality, dividend - paying equities, and you likely won't take a hit.
And while Macdonald did
not look into it, other studies have pointed to another major influence China has had lately on many countries, including Canada: how its high savings rate and mounting foreign currency reserves, much of it invested in benchmark U.S.
government debt, have depressed interest rates around the world.
Canada's
debt - saddled
governments aren't in a position to reprise the 2009 stimulus spend, and Canadian consumers definitely shouldn't be further stressing their credit cards and bank lines.
Also, while consumer
debt is falling and corporate
debt is
not yet at crisis levels, keep in mind that
government debt has skyrocketed — ironically, as a response to slow growth in the global economic system.
Improving crumbling infrastructure and creating new jobs is a worthy endeavour, but it will add significantly to Ontario's
debt load, whether or
not the
government goes it alone on projects or partners with the private sector.
«There won't be enough money in the
government to allow for a tax cut and fiscal stimulus program if in effect the
government can't even pay the interest on the
debt without borrowing the money.»
He then turns to a related point, which is that the Fed is somehow «monetizing the
debt» — printing money so that the
government doesn't have to legitimately pay off its obligations.
So freezing the
debt limit doesn't «take away the
government's credit card.»
If the Fed were monetizing the
debt, then it would rip up the Treasuries it buys, so that the
government doesn't have to pay them off.
While the BoJ has argued that central bank asset purchases would
not work in the absence of structural reforms, strategists said that high
government debt levels will constrain fiscal expansion.
Governments need to retrench fiscally, but this should
not be pursued in the short term while the world economy is in danger of falling into recession when heavy
debt loads are to be paid.
We are beginning to see the drag on growth brought about the inexorable rise of total (
not just
government) US
debt.
That's because while declaring bankruptcy would help the sunny Caribbean island restructure and reduce its $ 72 billion
debt load, it wouldn't help Puerto Rico slim down its costly
government operations in order to avoid getting in trouble again.
Second, while it makes sense that an environment in which investments, like
government debt, are yielding a smaller return might cause people to spend less today in order to make their retirement goals, there just isn't a lot of evidence that this happens in the real world.
If the U.S. doesn't exempt Canadian
government debt under Volcker, then it would «significantly impede» how the banks handle their liquidity and funding requirements.
Foreign
government debt, however, is
not exempted.
It won't be easy considering some of the larger events taking place around us: the ever - shifting European
debt crisis, Congress» inaction on deficit reduction, and a general
government stalemate here at home.
The legislation, called PROMESA, would create a federal oversight board to help Puerto Rico
governments balance their budgets, improve financial reporting and facilitate
debt restructuring when voluntary agreements between creditors and borrowers can
not be reached.
The Fund said China still hasn't addressed the underlying causes of the ongoing expansion in
government and corporate
debt, despite measures to bolster financial stability this year.
While states technically can
not go bankrupt, the assumption is that the federal
government would step in to resuscitate them should they default on all of their
debts.
It is illegal for the U.S. to spend past its self - imposed cap, but it is equally illegal for the federal
government not to honour its
debts.
The only reason the economy stays afloat, he believes, is that the
government maintains a closed system that doesn't require bad
debts to be written down.
Sovereign
debt crises tend to be messy and drawn - out — as Greece has shown — because the world lacks a global bankruptcy process to restructure
debts that
governments can't pay.
Tomorrow, in part three of our four - part series «Why we can't stop spending,» we look at how
government policy has aided and abetted Canadians» slide into unsustainable
debt.
It may now be forced to default on its
debt to international lenders if
not bailed out by the Russian
government.
# 2: They acknowledge the
debt, but tell themselves fairy tales that it doesn't matter... or that the
government is going to somehow «fix» it.
Don't look to the taxing power of
governments to bring sovereign
debt back in line.
Is it hereafter condemned to slow growth and unsustainable boomer - driven
debt because the
government can't pass sensible reforms?
Goal: Free Entrepreneurs with any
government back taxes, ridiculous child supports (which most of the money will go to the system
not the child), unexplainable fines, medical bills, and
debt.
A
government that is sovereign in its currency, has no foreign denominated
debt and a central bank that can issue its own currency does
not have to worry about someone else telling them that they need to raise their interest costs.
And if you don't pay back the taxes for a long time, the
government will eventually enforce the lien by seizing and selling your property to satisfy the
debt.
The
Government has
not intervened, accepting the banks» assertion that they lack the resources to grant meaningful
debt relief to households.
Governments must
not leave our grandchildren
debt.
According to Griesa (uniquely), this means that if any creditor or vulture fund refuses to participate in a
debt writedown, no such agreement can be reached and the sovereign
government can
not pay any bondholders anywhere in the world, regardless of what foreign jurisdiction the bonds were issued under.
Mainly the socialist social programs of the U.S. will (more) rapidly bankrupt the country if the U.S.
government can't continue to print dollars to inflate it's way out of it's incredible mountain of
debt.
Excessive
government debt will stifle economic growth regardless of whether its stashed in local or central
government balance sheets and if a province's fiscal situation should become unsustainable — although that's
not in the cards in the near future — it'll likely be up to federal
government to foot the bill for a bailout.
Your anchor of eliminating total
government sector net
debt relied heavily on growing surpluses in the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans (which will
not continue as the baby - boomers retire).
Funds may also
not be used to reimburse a business owner for money he or she has previously invested in the business or be used to repay money owed the
government, such as a tax
debt.
Not only will city and state
governments add more penalties the longer you ignore your tickets, but they could decide to report them to the credit bureaus as
debts.
A collection agency, whether through the US
government or private lender, won't usually settle a defaulted student loan
debt if it's less than the amount that the lender is likely to receive over the life of the original loan — so negotiation is essential during settlement talks.
They also may
not be used to reimburse a business owner for money he or she has previously invested in the business or used to repay money owed to the
government, such as a tax
debt.
Unlike the borrowings for these Crown corporations, the market
debt of the federal
government is
not fully supported by offsetting assets.
In the Fall Update, the
government will
not only be able to show the elimination of the deficit (something no other G - 7 country has achieved) one year earlier than targeted, but also to show a declining
debt ratio, rapidly approaching the
government's target of 25 per cent, the lowest since the 1960s
The federal
government offers a few programs for rehabilitation, but this might
not be the best route depending on what type of student loan
debt you have.
What's
not being discussed, however, is how the crackdown could threaten one of the
government's other main priorities: managing
debt.
«The central banks» plans for printing money to buy bonds from national
governments running huge deficits can
not be considered a long - term solution to
debt problems.»
Unfortunately, most Canadians seem to have drunk the conservative fiscal «grape juice» that all deficits and
debt are bad and that any
government that would run a deficit, no matter how small, is
not a
government to be trusted with managing the country's finances.
What is most important to recognize about successful
government financial policy is that control of the money supply historically has been accompanied by control over the economy's
debt overhead, including the ability to write off
debts that could
not be paid.