They are statisticians and polling experts,
not guessers.
Not exact matches
Unless you work at a carnival as a professional weight
guesser, you probably wouldn't notice if someone weighed five pounds more than his or her profile indicated.
And educated guesses reflect
not only the education of the
guessers, but also their theories, their prejudices, and their politics.
FALSE PROPHETS, a biblical test would be that if what they say and prophesy comes to pass regard what they say but if it doesn't then don't listen to them.This seems to me the obvious approach to climate science and in fact all science and self evident as the way in which most people react.Crying wolf even if the wolf was there but keeps disappearing will lose the present scientific comunity credibility.Credibility in science is more important than risky prophesy which may give people a warning and may
not, so that when scientists are reasonably sure [as in beyond reasonable doubt] they will be believed and their warnings acted upon.Better be an honest scientist than a lucky
guesser.
If so then former weight
guesser or
not, if you think they were speeding then they were speeding!
They hadn't even taught her anything yet and passed because she is a good
guesser.
Unless you work at a carnival as a professional weight
guesser, you probably wouldn't notice if someone weighed five pounds more than his or her profile indicated.