Sentences with phrase «not have an equal right»

«As a company that is committed to the principle that everyone deserves to live without fear of discrimination simply for being who they are, becoming an employer in North Carolina, where members of our teams will not have equal rights under the law, is simply untenable,» Schulman wrote in an open letter.

I got my civil rights so screw people who don't have equal rights under the law.

Medicine was from the devil,... women should not be educated or taken seriously,... Black people should not have equal rights,... Or own land,... or GASP marry a white person,....

We can't have equal rights in America, simply because everyone in America is about as far from «equal» as we could ever be.

I find it incredible that in 2017, we still do not have an Equal Rights Amendment in the US Constitution.

The Law Society guide explains that according to Sharia law, a woman does not have equal rights in inheritance matters; for example, a female heir is entitled to half of the inheritance provided to a male heir.

The only situation in which a father may not have equal rights to his child is when he is not married to the child's mother.

Not exact matches

Still, Pulatkonak sees great potential for the young women entrepreneurs coming into the pipeline to continue Turkey's progression toward equal rights, which has not only led to greater visibility for women leaders but has also recently paved the way for more egalitarian divorce laws.

Although enforcement of the Equal Pay Act and other civil rights laws has helped to narrow the gender pay gap, these actions only cover segments of the American working population, and many important protections are not yet codified in law.

You are right that bilateral accounts do not have to balance, but in this case both would decline even though they are not equal to each other.

My sister and I emigrated from Iran back in 1984, and just knowing that in the world there are countries, such as Iran, where women have no rights, and they can't work let alone run a corporation, and certainly aren't treated as equals... this is what fuels us, keeps us passionate and pushes us forward.

If Sarah Palin really believed in God and in God's creations all being equal, she would not be against gay marriage and the rights of all humans to be equal.

You dodged the question, I don't mind the way you did it, I just want to see if someone gay has equal rights by you (in the church)?

Most provinces and territories also have pay equity provisions in their human rights statutes, but the Alberta Human Rights Act, RSA 2000, c A - 25.5 is deficient in not mandating equal pay for work of equal value, only for «the same or substantially similar work» (s 6 (1); see also Lrights statutes, but the Alberta Human Rights Act, RSA 2000, c A - 25.5 is deficient in not mandating equal pay for work of equal value, only for «the same or substantially similar work» (s 6 (1); see also LRights Act, RSA 2000, c A - 25.5 is deficient in not mandating equal pay for work of equal value, only for «the same or substantially similar work» (s 6 (1); see also Lahey).

Equal Rights under the law would ensure that no one religion's values get enshrined in our national laws, otherwise there would be no reason to not make a law forcing everyone to attend church on Sundays.

Had they voted to give equal rights to the pro choice proponents, this would not have been an issue.

That would involve impeaching him and you can't impeach him for standing up for equal rights and upholding the consti.tution.

i wish people would understand, however, that asking for fair and equal fourm and equal rights IS NOT persecution of thier religion.

This isn't to say all opinions are equal (naturally you would trust your physician's opinion about your sore throat over your barber's); simply that having one, even an uninformed one, is all right.

Civilized society requires that all men and women have equal rights before the law, but that equality should not extend to equality of condition: that is, society is a great partnership, in which all have equal rights — but not to equal things.

Now obviously the article isn't about Muslims so it wouldn't have a picture of the Koran but take a second and think about it in my perspective (Which is a non-biased, equal rights opinion).

Our country is not fighting over the basic things...healthcare - everyone country wide has it; equal rights - everyone country wide has them.

Living does not equal having legal rights that trump those of the person upon whom the fetus is dependent.

CNN: Church that barred black wedding affirms commitment to equal treatment A Mississippi church that wouldn't allow a black couple to marry in its sanctuary because of the couple's race appears to be trying to right a wrong, as officials with the church's denomination decried the incident.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

When asked if dads should get the same time off as mothers after the birth of their child he replied: «I don't see why not, a child has two parents often and actually to give them both equal rights is a good thing.

due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.

6 — You would be screaming from the rooftops in OPPOSITION if Muslim Koran Sharia Law (or another religion different from your own) was imposed upon everyone and YOU were denied Equal Rights if you did NOT abide by Muslim Law, but you think it is OK to impose Christian Bible Laws on everyone to DENY OTHERS Equal Rights if they do NOT abide by Christian Bible Law.

Whether or not something is a choice is not a suitable criterion for whether someone should have equal rights and protections.

As far as Mohler's «The sky will fall», he can not name ONE ill effect granting equal right s to everyone would cause.

Women are treated like they are a possession... they do not have the same equal rights that women in other parts of the world and enjoy and thankfully when you do bring your women to civilized places, you no longer get away with treating them like trash without the risk of jail.

People won't stand for things as they stand, it has to get better, better enough that everyone is equal in the U.S., and that people chose the way they think is right for their families and themselves, not for anyone else.

Suppose we have the laws you want and a fetus has equal rights what happens if a woman is carrying a fetus and it's determined by her doctor that the fetus needs surgery before viability, but the woman does not want such surgery to be performed.

You may believe the Bible tells you gays should be able to marry or maybe even that blacks should not be able to marry whites (another thing people have used the Bible to protest against); however, that does not mean that US civil equal rights laws should be based on your personal religious beliefs.

The fetus does not have rights equal to those of the woman.

Yes, I was pretty harsh in my post, and have softened somewhat now... But you are right that worship does not equal singing.

Answer this gerry: Suppose we have the laws you want and a fetus has equal rights what happens if a woman is carrying a fetus and it's determined by her doctor that the fetus needs surgery before viability, but the woman does not want such surgery to be performed.

Judge made the biggest mistake of his life to let that mosque to be built.and problem is that people will pay heavily for that decision.Islam is the source of problem, Koran is the source problem.They use our freedom of religion, they sneak in cities under the name of peace and love then they strike hard, though other religions have no rights in their contries.Here is statement from Omar Ahmed chairman of the Board of council on America Islamic Relation:» Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth «Does this sounds to you religionf peace, love and logic?or terrorist thresd for thr future?

The main barrier, however, would seem to be that these countries, in fact all countries, do not really consider all human beings equal in rights and dignity.

In Canada, with probably the most egalitarian laws, a child can now have three official parents (not just two parents and a step - parent with equal rights, but three official parents).

Extending equal right to everyone doesn't take away any right from those that already have them.

The nerve of the Jim Henson Company not wanting to do business with a company that doesn't believe everyone should have equal rights.

Doesn't the church have an equal right to that of individual Christians to make a corporate statement?

That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence, and therefore all men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience, and that no particular religious sect or society ought to be favored or established by law in preferrence [sic] to others.

Whether it's Nature or it's a choice... since there is -0 - evidence that sincere loving moral gay individuals aren't hurting anyone, why would you want to deny them equal rights under the law?

There are lots of myths... flying saucers, Santa, etc.... but people that believe in those, don't preach hatred and intolerance of others... as well as trying to deprive them of equal rights that other taxpayers in this country (and elsewhere) have access to.

How can you say your way is the «right way», and the only way accepted by God, when God hasn't provided the details of this way to all his equal human creations throughout the world?

As for your second point, we wouldn't be exchanging one system for another, we would be adding something to the existing system to provide equal rights to people who have not had them.

Christians won't try to force their religion on people in public places, schools, events, etc. and won't try to keep others from having equal right?

Also - 2 +2 doesn't equal 1111, that would be saying 2 +2 +15, and we all know that isn't right.